Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0DVF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DVF].

Algebra, chapter X, § 4. Produits de torsion

If u:C→C′u:C\to C' is a morphism of complexes of right A-modules and EE a complex of left A-modules, then the complexes Con⁡(u)⊗AE\operatorname{Con}(u)\otimes_A E and Con⁡(u⊗1E)\operatorname{Con}(u\otimes 1_E) are isomorphic.

By definition, Con⁡(u)⊗AE\operatorname{Con}(u)\otimes_A E is the graded module (C′(−1)⊕C)⊗AE(C'(-1)\oplus C)\otimes_A E endowed with the differential DD such that, for x∈Cpx\in C_p, y′∈C′(−1)p=Cp−1′y'\in C'(-1)_p=C'_{p-1}, z∈Eqz\in E_q, we have

(4)

D(y′,x)⊗z=(−dy′,dx−u(y′))⊗z+(−1)p(y′,x)⊗dz, D(y',x)\otimes z=(-dy',dx-u(y'))\otimes z+(-1)^p(y',x)\otimes dz,

while Con⁡(u⊗1E)\operatorname{Con}(u\otimes 1_E) is the graded module (C′⊗AE)(−1)⊕(C⊗AE)(C'\otimes_A E)(-1)\oplus(C\otimes_A E) endowed with the differential D1D_1 such that, for x∈Cpx\in C_p, y′∈Cp−1′y'\in C'_{p-1}, z∈Eqz\in E_q, we have

D1(y′⊗z,x⊗z)=(−dy′⊗z−(−1)p−1y′⊗dz,dx⊗z+(−1)px⊗dz−u(y′)⊗z) D_1(y'\otimes z,x\otimes z)=(-dy'\otimes z-(-1)^{p-1}y'\otimes dz,dx\otimes z+(-1)^p x\otimes dz-u(y')\otimes z)
=(−dy′⊗z,(dx−u(y′))⊗z)+(−1)p(y′⊗dz,x⊗dz), =(-dy'\otimes z,(dx-u(y'))\otimes z)+(-1)^p(y'\otimes dz,x\otimes dz),

whence the assertion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.