The mapping (f,g)↦TorA(f,g):
HomA(M,M′)×HomA(N,N′)→Homk(TorA(M,N),TorA(M′,N′))
is k-bilinear.
Let f∈HomA(M,M′), g1,g2∈HomA(N,N′), λ1,λ2∈k. Then the morphisms
λ1(L(f)⊗g1)+λ2(L(f)⊗g2)andL(f)⊗(λ1g1+λ2g2)
from L(M)⊗AN into L(M)⊗AN′ coincide; by prop. 5 and Remark 3, one therefore has
(10)
TorA(f,λ1g1+λ2g2)=λ1TorA(f,g1)+λ2TorA(f,g2).
One reasons analogously for the mapping f↦TorA(f,g).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.