Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0DVO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DVO].

Algebra, chapter X, § 4. Produits de torsion

The mapping (f,g)↦TorA(f,g):(f, g) \mapsto \mathrm{Tor}^A(f, g) :

HomA(M,M′)×HomA(N,N′)→Homk(TorA(M,N),TorA(M′,N′)) \mathrm{Hom}_A(M, M') \times \mathrm{Hom}_A(N, N') \to \mathrm{Hom}_k(\mathrm{Tor}^A(M, N), \mathrm{Tor}^A(M', N'))

is kk-bilinear.

Let f∈HomA(M,M′)f \in \mathrm{Hom}_A(M, M'), g1,g2∈HomA(N,N′)g_1, g_2 \in \mathrm{Hom}_A(N, N'), λ1,λ2∈k\lambda_1, \lambda_2 \in k. Then the morphisms

λ1(L(f)⊗g1)+λ2(L(f)⊗g2)andL(f)⊗(λ1g1+λ2g2) \lambda_1(L(f) \otimes g_1) + \lambda_2(L(f) \otimes g_2) \quad \text{and} \quad L(f) \otimes (\lambda_1 g_1 + \lambda_2 g_2)

from L(M)⊗ANL(M) \otimes_A N into L(M)⊗AN′L(M) \otimes_A N' coincide; by prop. 5 and Remark 3, one therefore has

(10)

TorA(f,λ1g1+λ2g2)=λ1TorA(f,g1)+λ2TorA(f,g2). \mathrm{Tor}^A(f, \lambda_1 g_1 + \lambda_2 g_2) = \lambda_1 \mathrm{Tor}^A(f, g_1) + \lambda_2 \mathrm{Tor}^A(f, g_2).

One reasons analogously for the mapping f↦TorA(f,g)f \mapsto \mathrm{Tor}^A(f, g).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.