Theorem 2
Tag 0DW0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DW0].
Algebra, chapter X, § 4. Produits de torsion
Let E be a right -module. The following conditions are equi- valent :
(i) E is flat ;
(ii) for every left -module F, and every integer , one has
(iii) For every cyclic left -module of finite presentation, we have
(iv) For every left ideal of of finite type, the canonical mapping is injective; (v) For every exact sequence of right -modules of the form
and every left -module , the sequence
is exact. (i) (ii): This is the corollary to Prop. 5 of X, p. 69. (ii) (iii): This is trivial. (iii) (iv): Every cyclic left -module of finite presentation is isomorphic to a quotient , where is a left ideal of finite type, so (iii) is equivalent to (iv) according to X, p. 72, Example. (iii) (i): According to X, p. 8, Prop. 3, X, p. 72, Th. 1, is flat as soon as for every left -module . If (iii) is satisfied, this is the case when is cyclic and of finite presentation. According to X, p. 11, Prop. 7, every -module (resp. every cyclic -module) is a filtered inductive limit of modules of finite presentation (resp. of cyclic modules of finite presentation); hence, according to X, p. 70, Prop. 8, it suffices to prove that if when is cyclic, then this is also the case when is of finite type. We therefore proceed by induction on the cardinal of a system of generators of ; the exact sequence
gives rise to an exact sequence
so that since and by the induction hypothesis. (i) (v): This is Corollary 2 to Th. 1 (X, p. 72). (v) (iii): The exact sequence (X, p. 50)
gives rise, for every left -module , to an exact sequence
If (v) is satisfied, we have , whence (iii).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.