Bourbaki

Example 2

Tag 0DYI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DYI].

Algebra, chapter X, § 6. Utilisation de résolutions non canoniques

It follows from the preceding that H1(G,M)H^1(G, M) is isomorphic to the Z\mathbf{Z}-module Z1(G,M)/B1(G,M)Z^1(G, M)/B^1(G, M), where Z1(G,M)Z^1(G, M) is the Z\mathbf{Z}-module of mappings ff of GG into MM satisfying:

f(g1,g2)=g1.f(g2)+f(g1)for all g1,g2 in G, f(g_1,g_2)=g_1.f(g_2)+f(g_1)\quad\text{for all }g_1,g_2\text{ in }G,

and B1(G,M)B^1(G, M) is the sub-Z\mathbf{Z}-module of Z1(G,M)Z^1(G, M) consisting of the ff for which there exists an element mm of MM such that:

f(g)=g.m−mfor every g∈G. f(g)=g.m-m\quad\text{for every }g\in G.

One sometimes says that Z1(G,M)Z^1(G, M) is the Z\mathbf{Z}-module of crossed homomorphisms of GG into MM, and B1(G,M)B^1(G, M) the submodule of principal crossed homomorphisms.

Let us denote by ι:G→Aut⁡(M)\iota:G\to \operatorname{Aut}(M) the homomorphism deduced from the action of GG; consider the external semidirect product M×ιGM\times_{\iota}G and the extension ξι:M×ιG→G\xi_{\iota}:M\times_{\iota}G\to G (I, p. 64). Let e:G→M×ιGe:G\to M\times_{\iota}G be a mapping such that ρ∘e=1G\rho\circ e=1_G; one has e=(f,1G)e=(f,1_G), where f∈C1(G,M)f\in C^1(G,M). In order that ee be a homomorphism (that is to say, a section of the extension ξι\xi_{\iota}), it is necessary and sufficient that f∈Z1(G,M)f\in Z^1(G,M). In order that two sections of ξι\xi_{\iota} be conjugate by an element of i(M)i(M), it is necessary and sufficient that the corresponding crossed homomorphisms have the same class in H1(G,M)H^1(G,M).

When GG operates trivially on MM, one has B1(G,M)=0B^1(G,M)=0 and H1(G,M)H^1(G,M) is isomorphic to the Z\mathbf{Z}-module of group homomorphisms of GG into MM.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.