Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0DZS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DZS].

Algebra, chapter X, § 7. Produit de composition

Let θ∈ExtAn(M,N)\theta \in \mathrm{Ext}^n_A(M, N), resp. θ′∈ExtAn(M′,N′)\theta' \in \mathrm{Ext}^n_A(M', N'), be the class of an exact sequence

0→N→fn+1Rn→…→R1→f1M→0, 0 \to N \xrightarrow{f_{n+1}} R_n \to \ldots \to R_1 \xrightarrow{f_1} M \to 0,
resp. 0→N′→fn+1′Rn′→…→R1′→f1′M′→0.0 \to N' \xrightarrow{f'_{n+1}} R'_n \to \ldots \to R'_1 \xrightarrow{f'_1} M' \to 0.

Let iN, iN′i_N,\ i_{N'}, be the canonical injections of NN and N′N' into N⊕N′N \oplus N', qM, qM′q_M,\ q_{M'}, the projections of M⊕M′M \oplus M' onto MM and M′M'. Consider the homomorphism

m=Ext (qM, iN)⊕Ext (qM′, iN′) m = \mathrm{Ext}\,(q_M,\ i_N) \oplus \mathrm{Ext}\,(q_{M'},\ i_{N'})

from ExtA(M,N)⊕ExtA(M′,N′)\mathrm{Ext}_A(M, N) \oplus \mathrm{Ext}_A(M', N') into ExtA(M⊕M′,N⊕N′)\mathrm{Ext}_A(M \oplus M', N \oplus N'). The element

m(θ,θ′)=iN∘θ∘qM+iN′∘θ′∘qM′ m(\theta, \theta') = i_N \circ \theta \circ q_M + i_{N'} \circ \theta' \circ q_{M'}

is the class of the exact sequence

0→N⊕N′→fn−1⊕fn−1′Rn⊕Rn′→…→R1⊕R1′→f1⊕f1′M⊕M′→0. 0 \to N \oplus N' \xrightarrow{f_{n-1} \oplus f'_{n-1}} R_n \oplus R'_n \to \ldots \to R_1 \oplus R'_1 \xrightarrow{f_1 \oplus f'_1} M \oplus M' \to 0 .

Indeed, if one denotes this class by θ′′\theta'', it follows from prop. 4 that one has

θ′′∘iM=iN∘θ=m(θ,θ′)∘iMandθ′′∘iM′=iN′∘θ=m(θ,θ′)∘iM′; \theta'' \circ i_M = i_N \circ \theta = m(\theta, \theta') \circ i_M \quad \text{and} \quad \theta'' \circ i_{M'} = i_{N'} \circ \theta = m(\theta, \theta') \circ i_{M'} ;

by X, p. 89, prop. 7, this entails θ′′=m(θ,θ′)\theta'' = m(\theta, \theta').

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.