Let n n n be an integer ⩾ 1 \geqslant 1 ⩾ 1 , M M M and N N N two A A A -modules.
a) Every element of E x t A n ( M , N ) \mathrm{Ext}^n_A(M, N) Ext A n ( M , N ) is the class of an exact sequence (X, p. 117, def. 1).
b) Let 0 → N → f n + 1 R n → f n … → R 1 → f 1 M → 0 0 \to N \xrightarrow{f_{n+1}} R_n \xrightarrow{f_n} \ldots \to R_1 \xrightarrow{f_1} M \to 0 0 → N f n + 1 R n f n … → R 1 f 1 M → 0 and 0 → N → f n + 1 R n ′ → f n … → R 1 ′ → f 1 M → 0 0 \to N \xrightarrow{f_{n+1}} R'_n \xrightarrow{f_n} \ldots \to R'_1 \xrightarrow{f_1} M \to 0 0 → N f n + 1 R n ′ f n … → R 1 ′ f 1 M → 0
be exact sequences, θ \theta θ and θ ′ \theta' θ ′ the associated classes. The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) θ = θ ′ \theta = \theta' θ = θ ′ ;
(ii) there exists a commutative diagram with exact rows:
0 ⟶ N → f n + 1 R n ⟶ … ⟶ R 1 → f 1 M ⟶ 0 1 N ↑ ↑ ↑ 1 M ↑ 0 ⟶ N ⟶ R n ′ ′ ⟶ … ⟶ R 1 ′ ′ ⟶ M ⟶ 0 1 N ↓ ↓ ↓ 1 M ↓ 0 ⟶ N → f n + 1 ′ R n ′ ⟶ … ⟶ R 1 ′ → f 1 ′ M ⟶ 0 ;
\begin{array}{ccccccccccccc}
0 & \longrightarrow & N & \xrightarrow{f_{n+1}} & R_n & \longrightarrow & \ldots & \longrightarrow & R_1 & \xrightarrow{f_1} & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \uparrow & & \uparrow & & & & \uparrow & & 1_M \uparrow \\
0 & \longrightarrow & N & \longrightarrow & R''_n & \longrightarrow & \ldots & \longrightarrow & R''_1 & \longrightarrow & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & & \downarrow & & 1_M \downarrow \\
0 & \longrightarrow & N & \xrightarrow{f'_{n+1}} & R'_n & \longrightarrow & \ldots & \longrightarrow & R'_1 & \xrightarrow{f'_1} & M & \longrightarrow & 0 ;
\end{array}
0 0 0 ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ N 1 N ↑ N 1 N ↓ N f n + 1 ⟶ f n + 1 ′ R n ↑ R n ′′ ↓ R n ′ ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ … … … ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ R 1 ↑ R 1 ′′ ↓ R 1 ′ f 1 ⟶ f 1 ′ M 1 M ↑ M 1 M ↓ M ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ 0 0 0 ;
(iii) there exists a commutative diagram with exact rows:
0 ⟶ N → f n + 1 R n ⟶ … ⟶ R 1 → f 1 M ⟶ 0 1 N ↓ ↓ ↓ 1 M ↓ 0 ⟶ N ⟶ R n ′ ′ ⟶ … ⟶ R 1 ′ ′ ⟶ M ⟶ 0 1 N ↑ ↑ ↑ 1 M ↑ 0 ⟶ N → f n + 1 ′ R n ′ ⟶ … ⟶ R 1 ′ → f 1 ′ M ⟶ 0.
\begin{array}{ccccccccccccc}
0 & \longrightarrow & N & \xrightarrow{f_{n+1}} & R_n & \longrightarrow & \ldots & \longrightarrow & R_1 & \xrightarrow{f_1} & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & & \downarrow & & 1_M \downarrow \\
0 & \longrightarrow & N & \longrightarrow & R''_n & \longrightarrow & \ldots & \longrightarrow & R''_1 & \longrightarrow & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \uparrow & & \uparrow & & & & \uparrow & & 1_M \uparrow \\
0 & \longrightarrow & N & \xrightarrow{f'_{n+1}} & R'_n & \longrightarrow & \ldots & \longrightarrow & R'_1 & \xrightarrow{f'_1} & M & \longrightarrow & 0 .
\end{array}
0 0 0 ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ N 1 N ↓ N 1 N ↑ N f n + 1 ⟶ f n + 1 ′ R n ↓ R n ′′ ↑ R n ′ ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ … … … ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ R 1 ↓ R 1 ′′ ↑ R 1 ′ f 1 ⟶ f 1 ′ M 1 M ↓ M 1 M ↑ M ⟶ ⟶ ⟶ 0 0 0.
Let us prove a a a . Let α ∈ E x t A n ( M , N ) \alpha \in \mathrm{Ext}_A^n(M, N) α ∈ Ext A n ( M , N ) , and let P P P be a projective resolution of M M M . Let a : P ( n ) → N a : P(n) \to N a : P ( n ) → N be a morphism of complexes representing α \alpha α ; its unique non-zero component is an A A A -homomorphism u : P n → N u : P_n \to N u : P n → N which satisfies u ∘ d n + 1 = 0 u \circ d_{n+1} = 0 u ∘ d n + 1 = 0 , hence factors as u = u ‾ ∘ δ n u = \overline{u} \circ \delta_n u = u ∘ δ n , where δ n : P n → Z n − 1 \delta_n : P_n \to Z_{n-1} δ n : P n → Z n − 1 is the mapping induced by d n d_n d n (we put Z n − 1 = I m d n Z_{n-1} = \mathrm{Im}\, d_n Z n − 1 = Im d n ) and u ‾ \overline{u} u is an A A A -homomorphism from Z n − 1 Z_{n-1} Z n − 1 into N N N . By Remark 1, p. 117, the class θ ∈ E x t A n ( M , Z n − 1 ) \theta \in \mathrm{Ext}_A^n(M, Z_{n-1}) θ ∈ Ext A n ( M , Z n − 1 ) of the exact sequence
0 → Z n − 1 → P n − 1 → … → P 0 → M → 0
0 \to Z_{n-1} \to P_{n-1} \to \ldots \to P_0 \to M \to 0
0 → Z n − 1 → P n − 1 → … → P 0 → M → 0
is equal to the homotopy class of the morphism ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) / 2 δ n (-1)^{n(n+1)/2} \delta_n ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) /2 δ n . We therefore have
α = ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) / 2 u ‾ ∘ θ ,
\alpha = (-1)^{n(n+1)/2} \overline{u} \circ \theta ,
α = ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) /2 u ∘ θ ,
which makes it possible, by Cor. 3, p. 120, to represent α \alpha α as the class of an exact sequence.
Let us prove b b b . It follows from Cor. 1 of X, p. 120 that (ii) ⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ (i) and that (iii) ⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ (i). Suppose that (i) is satisfied, and let P P P be a projective resolution of M M M . There exists a commutative diagram
0 → N → f n + 1 R n → R n − 1 → … → R 1 → M → 0 u n ↑ u n − 1 ↑ u n − 2 ↑ 1 M ↑ P n → d n P n − 1 → P n − 2 → … → P 0 → M → 0 u n ′ ↓ u n − 1 ′ ↓ u n − 2 ′ ↓ 1 M ↓ 0 → N → f n + 1 ′ R n ′ → R n − 1 ′ → … → R 1 ′ → M → 0.
\begin{array}{cccccccccccccc}
0 & \rightarrow & N & \xrightarrow{f_{n+1}} & R_n & \rightarrow & R_{n-1} & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & u_n \uparrow & & u_{n-1} \uparrow & & u_{n-2} \uparrow & & & & & & 1_M \uparrow \\
& & P_n & \xrightarrow{d_n} & P_{n-1} & \rightarrow & P_{n-2} & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & P_0 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & u'_n \downarrow & & u'_{n-1} \downarrow & & u'_{n-2} \downarrow & & & & & & 1_M \downarrow \\
0 & \rightarrow & N & \xrightarrow{f'_{n+1}} & R'_n & \rightarrow & R'_{n-1} & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R'_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 .
\end{array}
0 0 → → N u n ↑ P n u n ′ ↓ N f n + 1 d n f n + 1 ′ R n u n − 1 ↑ P n − 1 u n − 1 ′ ↓ R n ′ → → → R n − 1 u n − 2 ↑ P n − 2 u n − 2 ′ ↓ R n − 1 ′ → → → … → … → … → R 1 P 0 R 1 ′ → → → M M M → 1 M ↑ → 1 M ↓ → 0 0 0.
The morphisms from P ( n ) P(n) P ( n ) into N N N defined by u n u_n u n and u n ′ u'_n u n ′ are homotopic, since they both belong to the class ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) / 2 θ (-1)^{n(n+1)/2} \theta ( − 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) /2 θ , hence u n ′ − u n u'_n - u_n u n ′ − u n is of the form w ∘ d n w \circ d_n w ∘ d n , where w : P n − 1 → N w : P_{n-1} \to N w : P n − 1 → N is an A A A -homomorphism. Replacing u n − 1 ′ u'_{n-1} u n − 1 ′ by u n − 1 ′ − f n + 1 ′ ∘ w u'_{n-1} - f'_{n+1} \circ w u n − 1 ′ − f n + 1 ′ ∘ w and u n ′ u'_n u n ′ by u n u_n u n , we reduce to the case where u n = u n ′ u_n = u'_n u n = u n ′ . This makes it possible to construct a new commutative diagram with exact rows:
0 → N → R n → R n − 1 → … → R 1 → M → 0 1 N ↑ v ↑ u n − 2 ↑ 1 M ↑ 0 → N → N ′ → P n − 2 → … → P 0 → M → 0 1 N ↓ v ′ ↓ u n − 2 ′ ↓ 1 M ↓ 0 → N → R n ′ → R n − 1 ′ → … → R 1 ′ → M → 0
\begin{array}{cccccccccccccc}
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & R_n & \rightarrow & R_{n-1} & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \uparrow & & v \uparrow & & u_{n-2} \uparrow & & & & & & 1_M \uparrow \\
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & N' & \rightarrow & P_{n-2} & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & P_0 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \downarrow & & v' \downarrow & & u'_{n-2} \downarrow & & & & & & 1_M \downarrow \\
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & R'_n & \rightarrow & R'_{n-1} & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R'_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0
\end{array}
0 0 0 → → → N 1 N ↑ N 1 N ↓ N → → → R n v ↑ N ′ v ′ ↓ R n ′ → → → R n − 1 u n − 2 ↑ P n − 2 u n − 2 ′ ↓ R n − 1 ′ → → → … → … → … → R 1 P 0 R 1 ′ → → → M M M → 1 M ↑ → 1 M ↓ → 0 0 0
where N ′ N' N ′ is the quotient of P n − 1 ⊕ N P_{n-1} \oplus N P n − 1 ⊕ N by the submodule formed by the couples ( d n ( x ) , − u n ( x ) ) (d_n(x), -u_n(x)) ( d n ( x ) , − u n ( x )) for x ∈ P n x \in P_n x ∈ P n , and where v v v (resp. v ′ v' v ′ ) is defined by passing to the quotient from the mapping u n − 1 ⊕ f n + 1 u_{n-1} \oplus f_{n+1} u n − 1 ⊕ f n + 1 (resp. u n − 1 ′ ⊕ f n + 1 ′ u'_{n-1} \oplus f'_{n+1} u n − 1 ′ ⊕ f n + 1 ′ ). Condition (ii) is therefore satisfied.
Suppose again that condition (i) is satisfied, and let E E E be an injective resolution of N N N . There exists a commutative diagram
0 → N → R n → … → R 1 → M → 0 1 N ↓ v 0 ↓ 0 → N ′ → E 0 → δ 0 … → E n − 1 → δ n − 1 E n 1 N ↑ v 0 ′ ↑ 0 → N → R n ′ → … → R 1 ′ → M → 0
\begin{array}{cccccccccccc}
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & R_n & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \downarrow & & v_0 \downarrow & & & & & & & \\
0 & \rightarrow & N' & \rightarrow & E^0 & \xrightarrow{\delta^0} & \ldots \rightarrow & E^{n-1} & \xrightarrow{\delta^{n-1}} & E^n \\
& & 1_N \uparrow & & v'_0 \uparrow & & & & & & & \\
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & R'_n & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R'_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0
\end{array}
0 0 0 → → → N 1 N ↓ N ′ 1 N ↑ N → → → R n v 0 ↓ E 0 v 0 ′ ↑ R n ′ → δ 0 → … → … → … → R 1 E n − 1 R 1 ′ → δ n − 1 → M E n M → → 0 0
and we show as above that we can assume v n ′ = v n v'_n = v_n v n ′ = v n . We then have a commutative diagram with exact rows
0 → N → R n → … → R 2 → R 1 → M → 0 1 N ↓ ↓ 1 M ↓ 0 → N → E 0 → … → E n − 2 → M ′ → M → 0 1 N ↑ ↑ 1 M ↑ 0 → N → R n ′ → … → R 2 ′ → R 1 ′ → M → 0
\begin{array}{cccccccccccccc}
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & R_n & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R_2 & \rightarrow & R_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \downarrow & & \downarrow & & & & & & & & 1_M \downarrow \\
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & E^0 & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & E^{n-2} & \rightarrow & M' & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0 \\
& & 1_N \uparrow & & \uparrow & & & & & & & & 1_M \uparrow \\
0 & \rightarrow & N & \rightarrow & R'_n & \rightarrow & \ldots \rightarrow & R'_2 & \rightarrow & R'_1 & \rightarrow & M & \rightarrow & 0
\end{array}
0 0 0 → → → N 1 N ↓ N 1 N ↑ N → → → R n ↓ E 0 ↑ R n ′ → → → … → … → … → R 2 E n − 2 R 2 ′ → → → R 1 M ′ R 1 ′ → → → M M M → 1 M ↓ → 1 M ↑ → 0 0 0
with M ′ = M × R 1 E n − 1 M' = M \times_{\mathbf{R}_1} E_{n-1} M ′ = M × R 1 E n − 1 (cf. X, p. 120, cor. 3, b)). Condition (iii) is therefore satisfied, which completes the proof of the theorem.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.