Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 0DZV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DZV].

Algebra, chapter X, § 7. Produit de composition

Let 0→N→fR→gM→00 \to N \xrightarrow{f} R \xrightarrow{g} M \to 0 and 0→N→f′R′→g′M→00 \to N \xrightarrow{f'} R' \xrightarrow{g'} M \to 0 be two exact sequences, θ\theta and θ′\theta' their associated classes in Ext1(M,N)\mathrm{Ext}^1(M, N). For θ=θ′\theta = \theta' to hold, it is necessary and sufficient that there exists an A-homomorphism h:R→R′h : R \to R' making the diagram

RN→fR↓h↓gM→f′R′→g′ \begin{array}{ccc} & & R \\ N & \xrightarrow{f} & R \\ & \downarrow h & \downarrow g \\ & & M \\ & \xrightarrow{f'} & R' \\ & & \xrightarrow{g'} \end{array}

commutative. Such a homomorphism is necessarily an isomorphism.

The condition is sufficient according to cor. 1 of prop. 4. If θ=θ′\theta = \theta', there exists a commutative diagram with exact rows:

0⟶N⟶R⟶M⟶01Nh′1M0⟶N⟶R′′⟶M⟶01Nh′′1M0⟶N⟶R′⟶M⟶0. \begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & \longrightarrow & N & \longrightarrow & R & \longrightarrow & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\ & & ^{1_N} & & ^{h'} & & ^{1_M} & & \\ 0 & \longrightarrow & N & \longrightarrow & R'' & \longrightarrow & M & \longrightarrow & 0 \\ & & ^{1_N} & & ^{h''} & & ^{1_M} & & \\ 0 & \longrightarrow & N & \longrightarrow & R' & \longrightarrow & M & \longrightarrow & 0 . \end{array}

The homomorphisms h′h' and h′′h'' are isomorphisms according to X, p. 7, cor. 3, and h=h′′∘h′−1h = h'' \circ {h'}^{-1} answers the question. The last assertion follows from loc. cit.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.