Consider two short exact sequences of left A-modules
00→M′→M→M′′→0→N′→N→N′′→0.
Then the composite connecting homomorphisms
ExtAn(M′,N′′)→ExtAn+1(M′′,N′′)→ExtAn+2(M′′,N′)
and
ExtAn(M′,N′′)→ExtAn+1(M′,N′)→ExtAn+2(M′′,N′)
are opposite.
Indeed, let θ1, θ2 be the classes associated with the given exact sequences, and let α∈ExtAn(M′,M′′). The images of α are respectively
θ2∘((−1)n+1α∘θ1)and(θ2∘α)∘((−1)n+2θ1).
Consider a short exact sequence of left A-modules
(S)0→N→RnfnRn−1fn−1⋯→R1f1M→0
and set K0=M, Ki=Kerfi, i=1,…,n−1, Kn=N. We therefore have exact sequences
(9)0→Ki→Ri→Ki−1→0,1≤i≤n,
to which are associated for every A left module P, connecting homomorphisms
ExtAm(P,Ki−1)→ExtAm+1(P,Ki),
ExtAm(Ki,P)→ExtAm+1(Ki−1,P),
whence by composition of the iterated connecting homomorphisms, associated with (S)
δm(P,S):ExtAm(P,M)→ExtAm+n(P,N)
δm(S,P):ExtAm(N,P)→ExtAm+n(M,P).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.