Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0E2Q, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0E2Q].

Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Complexes de Koszul

If the k-module L0L_0 is free with basis (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I}, the k-linear mappings g and h are bijective. This follows from III, p. 79, th. 1.

Let MM be a kk-module, and let x=(xi)i∈Ix = (x_i)_{i \in I} be a family of kk-endomorphisms of MM, pairwise permutable. Consider the polynomial ring A=k[(Xi)i∈I]A = k[(X_i)_{i \in I}] and endow MM with the structure of an AA-module such that P(Xi)m=P(xi)mP(X_i) m = P(x_i) m for P∈AP \in A and m∈Mm \in M. Let moreover LL be the free AA-module AIA^I, (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} its canonical basis and u:L→Au : L \to A the linear form which maps eie_i onto XiX_i for all i∈Ii \in I. Consider the complexes of kk-modules KA∗(u,M)K_A^*(u, M) and KA∗(u,M)K_A^*(u, M); one has canonical isomorphisms

KAp(u,M)=HomA(ΛAp(AI),M)→Homk(Λkp(kI),M), K_A^p(u, M) = \mathrm{Hom}_A(\Lambda_A^p(A^I), M) \to \mathrm{Hom}_k(\Lambda_k^p(k^I), M) ,
M⊗kΛkp(kI)→M⊗AΛAp(AI)=KAp(u,M); M \otimes_k \Lambda_k^p(k^I) \to M \otimes_A \Lambda_A^p(A^I) = K_A^p(u, M) ;
whence by composition with the isomorphisms gg and hh isomorphisms of k-modules
θp:KAp(u,M)→CIp(M), \theta^p : K_A^p(u, M) \to C_I^p(M) ,
θp:CIp(M)→KAp(u,M). \theta_p : C_I^p(M) \to K_A^p(u, M) .
We denote by
∂p:CIp(M)→CIp+1(M), \partial^p : C_I^p(M) \to C_I^{p+1}(M) ,
∂p:CIp(M)→CIp−1(M), \partial_p : C_I^p(M) \to C_I^{p-1}(M) ,
the kk-homomorphisms obtained by transporting the differentials of KA∗(u,M)K_A^*(u, M) and KA∗(u,M)K_A^*(u, M) by the isomorphisms θ\theta. For example, one has: (12)
(∂pm)(α1,...,αp+1)=∑j=1p+1(−1)j+1xαjm(α1,...,αj−1,αj+1,...,αp+1). (\partial^p m)(\alpha_1, ..., \alpha_{p+1}) = \sum_{j=1}^{p+1} (-1)^{j+1} x_{\alpha_j} m(\alpha_1, ..., \alpha_{j-1}, \alpha_{j+1}, ..., \alpha_{p+1}) .
The complex formed by the CIp(M)C_I^p(M) and the ∂p\partial^p (resp. the ∂p\partial_p) is denoted by K∗(x,M)K^*(x, M) (resp. K.(x,M)K.(x, M)) and is called the ascending (resp. descending) Koszul complex associated with the module M and the sequence of endomorphisms (x1,...,xn)(x_1, ..., x_n). One therefore has isomorphisms of complexes of kk-modules

θ∗:KA∗(u,M)→K∗(x,M), \theta^*: K_A^*(u, M) \to K^*(x, M),
θ∗:K∗(x,M)→KA∗(u,M). \theta_*: K_*(x, M) \to K_A^*(u, M).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.