If the k-module L0 is free with basis (ei)i∈I, the k-linear mappings g and h are bijective. This follows from III, p. 79, th. 1.
Let M be a k-module, and let x=(xi)i∈I be a family of k-endomorphisms of M, pairwise permutable. Consider the polynomial ring A=k[(Xi)i∈I] and endow M with the structure of an A-module such that P(Xi)m=P(xi)m for P∈A and m∈M. Let moreover L be the free A-module AI, (ei)i∈I its canonical basis and u:L→A the linear form which maps ei onto Xi for all i∈I. Consider the complexes of k-modules KA∗(u,M) and KA∗(u,M); one has canonical isomorphisms
KAp(u,M)=HomA(ΛAp(AI),M)→Homk(Λkp(kI),M), M⊗kΛkp(kI)→M⊗AΛAp(AI)=KAp(u,M); whence by composition with the isomorphisms
g and
h isomorphisms of k-modules θp:KAp(u,M)→CIp(M), θp:CIp(M)→KAp(u,M). We denote by
∂p:CIp(M)→CIp+1(M), ∂p:CIp(M)→CIp−1(M), the
k-homomorphisms obtained by transporting the differentials of
KA∗(u,M) and
KA∗(u,M) by the isomorphisms
θ. For example, one has: (12)
(∂pm)(α1,...,αp+1)=j=1∑p+1(−1)j+1xαjm(α1,...,αj−1,αj+1,...,αp+1). The complex formed by the
CIp(M) and the
∂p (resp. the
∂p) is denoted by
K∗(x,M) (resp.
K.(x,M)) and is called
the ascending (resp. descending) Koszul complex associated with the module M and the sequence of endomorphisms
(x1,...,xn). One therefore has isomorphisms of complexes of
k-modules
θ∗:KA∗(u,M)→K∗(x,M),
θ∗:K∗(x,M)→KA∗(u,M).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.