Bourbaki

Remark 4

Tag 0E36, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0E36].

Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Complexes de Koszul

One says that the sequence x=(x1,...,xn)x = (x_1, ..., x_n) is MM-coregular if (denoting by (xi)M(x_i)_M the homothety of ratio xix_i in MM) the homothety of ratio xix_i in the module

Ker⁡(x1)M∩...∩Ker⁡(xi−1)M \operatorname{Ker}(x_1)_M \cap ... \cap \operatorname{Ker}(x_{i-1})_M

is surjective for i=1,...,ni = 1, ..., n. One then has Hi(x,M)=0H_i(x, M) = 0 for i<ni < n: this is proved in the same way as prop. 5.

Take for example A=k[D1,...,Dn]A = k[D_1, ..., D_n], where kk is a Q\mathbf{Q}-algebra, and M=k[T1,...,Tn]M = k[T_1, ..., T_n], endowed with the AA-module structure such that DiP=∂P/∂TiD_i P = \partial P / \partial T_i for every P∈MP \in M (1⩽i⩽n1 \leqslant i \leqslant n). One verifies immediately that the sequence (D1,...,Dn)(D_1, ..., D_n) is MM-coregular; taking into account the example p. 155, one deduces that the de Rham complex of k[T1,...,Tn]k[T_1, ..., T_n] over kk is acyclic in degrees >0> 0.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.