Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0E3F, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0E3F].

Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Complexes de Koszul

Suppose the sequence x regular for M. If N is an A-module such that (x)N=0(x)N = 0, one has ExtAi(N,M)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(N, M) = 0 for i<ni < n, and the mapping α↦θx∘α\alpha \mapsto \theta_x \circ \alpha from Hom_A (N, M/(x) M) into Ext^n_A (N, M) (which is also the iterated connecting homomorphism associated with (19), cf. X, p. 127, Corollary 3) is bijective.

It remains to prove that the homomorphism ψi:α↦θx∘α\psi^i : \alpha \mapsto \theta_x \circ \alpha from ExtAi−n(N,M/(x)M)\mathrm{Ext}_A^{i-n}(N, M/(x) M) into ExtAi(N,M)\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(N, M) is bijective for i≤ni \leq n. Let us reason by induction on nn, the assertion being trivial for n=0n = 0. Put M1=M/x1MM_1 = M/x_1 M, x′=(x2,...,xn)x' = (x_2, ..., x_n), so that x′x' is M1M_1-regular. By the induction hypothesis, the homomorphism

ψ‾i−1:α↦θx′∘α \overline{\psi}^{i-1} : \alpha \mapsto \theta_{x'} \circ \alpha

from ExtAi−n(N,M/(x)M)\mathrm{Ext}_A^{i-n}(N, M/(x) M) into ExtAi−1(N,M1)\mathrm{Ext}_A^{i-1}(N, M_1) is bijective for i<ni < n. On the other hand, consider the exact sequence

0⟶M→(x1)MM⟶M1⟶0; 0 \longrightarrow M \xrightarrow{(x_1)_M} M \longrightarrow M_1 \longrightarrow 0 ;

the connecting homomorphism ExtAi(N,M1)→ExtAi+1(N,M)\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(N, M_1) \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^{i+1}(N, M) associated with it is φi:β↦θx1∘β\varphi^i : \beta \mapsto \theta_{x_1} \circ \beta (X, p. 125, Prop. 5) ;

since one has Exti(1N,(x1)M)=Exti((x1)N,1M)=0\mathrm{Ext}^i(1_N, (x_1)_M) = \mathrm{Ext}^i((x_1)_N, 1_M) = 0, one deduces from this exact sequences

0⟶ExtAi(N,M)⟶ExtAi(N,M1)→φiExtAi+1(N,M)⟶0. 0 \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ext}_A^i(N, M) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ext}_A^i(N, M_1) \xrightarrow{\varphi^i} \mathrm{Ext}_A^{i+1}(N, M) \longrightarrow 0 .

Since ExtAi(N,M1)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(N, M_1) = 0 for i<n−1i < n - 1, it follows that ExtAi+1(N,M)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^{i+1}(N, M) = 0 for i<n−1i < n - 1, that is to say for i+1<ni + 1 < n; it follows that φi\varphi^i is bijective for i<ni < n. Since ψi(α)=θx∘α=θx1∘θx′∘α=φi−1∘ψ‾i(α)\psi^i(\alpha) = \theta_x \circ \alpha = \theta_{x_1} \circ \theta_{x'} \circ \alpha = \varphi^{i-1} \circ \overline{\psi}^i(\alpha) for α∈ExtAi−n(N,M/(x)M)\alpha \in \mathrm{Ext}_A^{i-n}(N, M/(x) M), ψi\psi^i is indeed bijective for i≤ni \leq n.

EXERCISES

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.