Bourbaki

Remarks

Tag 0E5L, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0E5L].

Functions of a Real Variable, chapter V, § 1. COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONS ON A FILTERED SET

1) Let ViV_i (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) be nn normed vector spaces over K, and φ\varphi a function defined on V1×V2×⋯×VnV_1 \times V_2 \times \cdots \times V_n, with values in V; by passing to the quotient along R∞R_\infty the function φ\varphi defines a map from

H∞(F,V1)×⋯×H∞(F,Vn) \mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V_1) \times \cdots \times \mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V_n)
into H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V), which one most often denotes by φ(f~1,…,f~n)\varphi(\tilde{f}_1, \ldots, \tilde{f}_n) (Gen. Top., I, p. 67). For example, taking φ\varphi to be the maps (x,y)↦x+y(x, y) \mapsto x + y and x↦xλx \mapsto x\lambda (λ∈K\lambda \in K), one thus defines, for any two germs f~,g~\tilde{f}, \tilde{g} in H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V), the elements f~+g~\tilde{f} + \tilde{g} and f~λ\tilde{f}\lambda, and one verifies immediately that the rules of composition (f~,g~)↦f~+g~(\tilde{f}, \tilde{g}) \mapsto \tilde{f} + \tilde{g} and (λ,f~)↦f~λ(\lambda, \tilde{f}) \mapsto \tilde{f}\lambda define on H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V) a vector space structure over the field K; in this space O~\tilde{O} is the class formed by functions equal to 0 on a set in F\mathfrak{F}, and −f~-\tilde{f} is the class formed by functions equal to −f-f on a set in F\mathfrak{F}. In the same way, if V is an algebra over K, one defines on H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V) a second internal rule of composition (f~,g~)↦f~g~(\tilde{f}, \tilde{g}) \mapsto \tilde{f}\tilde{g} by taking φ(x,y)=xy\varphi(x, y) = xy; together with the two preceding rules this defines an algebra structure over K on H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V); if V has a unit element e then H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V) has as a unit element the class e~\tilde{e} formed by the functions equal to e on some set in F\mathfrak{F}; for f~\tilde{f} to be invertible in H∞(F,V)\mathscr{H}_\infty(\mathfrak{F}, V) it is necessary and sufficient that for some f∈f~f \in \tilde{f} there exists a Z∈FZ \in \mathfrak{F} such that f(t)f(t) is invertible in V for every t∈Zt \in Z (in which case this condition is satisfied by every function in the class f~\tilde{f}).

2) With the same notation, let ψ\psi be a map of a subset of ∏i=1nVi\prod_{i=1}^n V_i into V; we denote by ψ(f1,f2,…,fn)\psi(f_1, f_2, \ldots, f_n) the function equal to ψ(f1(t),f2(t),…,fn(t))\psi(f_1(t), f_2(t), \ldots, f_n(t)) at every point t∈Et \in E where the fi(t)f_i(t) are defined and where the point (fi(t))(f_i(t)) belongs to the set where ψ\psi is defined 1^1. For example, f+gf + g is the function equal to f(t)+g(t)f(t) + g(t) at every point t∈Et \in E where ff and gg are both defined. Observe that the map (f,g)↦f+g(f, g) \mapsto f + g is not a group law on H(F,V)\mathscr{H}(\mathfrak{F}, V), since if ff is not defined on all of E there is no function g∈H(F,V)g \in \mathscr{H}(\mathfrak{F}, V) such that f+g=0f + g = 0.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.