§ 2. Cohen rings
Throughout this paragraph, denotes a prime number.
1. -rings
Definition 1
A ring is said to be a -ring if the ideal of is maximal, and if is separated and complete for the -adic topology.
Let be a ring; if is nilpotent and if the ideal of is maximal, is a -ring, for the -adic topology of is discrete. In particular, every field of characteristic is a -ring.
Proposition 1
Let be a -ring.
a) The ring is local, with maximal ideal .
b) Suppose nilpotent. Let be the smallest positive integer such that . The ideals of are of the form with , and one has when and are two distinct integers satisfying . The -module is of length .
c) Suppose that is not nilpotent. Then is a discrete valuation ring whose residue field is of characteristic , and whose field of fractions is of characteristic . The ideals of the form , with , are pairwise distinct; they form all the non-zero ideals of . The -module is not of finite length.
Assertion a) follows from prop. 19 of III, , no. 13.
By hypothesis, one has . Let in ; there exists an integer such that , ; therefore there exists an element of such that ; since does not belong to , is invertible.
Suppose that is not nilpotent. If and are two non-zero elements of , there exist two integers , and two invertible elements , of such that , . We then have , hence is an integral domain. Since is a local ring, but is not a field, and since the maximal ideal of is principal, is a discrete valuation ring (VI, , no 6, prop. 9). The non-zero ideals of are then of the form by loc. cit., prop. 8, and are pairwise distinct. In particular, the ring is not artinian, hence the -module is not of finite length. The residue field of is of characteristic . Let be the characteristic of the field of fractions of . We have , whence . Moreover, if were non-zero, we should have hence would be of characteristic , which is absurd. This proves c).
Suppose that is nilpotent. Let be the smallest positive integer such that . We have a sequence of ideals
(E)
If is an integer such that and , we deduce
contrary to the hypothesis . Therefore the elements of the sequence (E) are pairwise distinct. Let be an ideal of and let be the smallest positive integer such that . Let be a nonzero element of ; we have seen that is of the form with and invertible in . Hence , whence , and finally . In conclusion, one has . The sequence (E) is then a Jordan-Hölder sequence of the -module , which is of length .
Corollary 1
If the -ring is an integral domain, it is a discrete valuation ring, or a field of characteristic .
Suppose is an integral domain. If is nilpotent, one has , and is a maximal ideal of , hence is a field of characteristic . If is not nilpotent, then is a discrete valuation ring by Prop. 1, c).
Corollary 2
Let be a -ring and an ideal of distinct from . The ring is a -ring.
One may suppose . There then exists an integer such that ; the ideal of is maximal and one has , therefore is a -ring.
Let be a -ring. The length of , denoted by , is the least upper bound in of the set of integers such that . When is finite, it is the length of the -module , and when is equal to , the -module is not of finite length (prop. 1).
Example 1
For every integer , the ring is a -ring of length . The ring of -adic integers is a -ring of infinite length.
Example 2
Let be a perfect field of characteristic . By prop. 8 of § 1, No. 8, the ring of Witt vectors is a -ring of infinite length. The mapping induces, by passing to quotients, an isomorphism of onto the field (loc. cit., prop. 7). For every integer , the ring
Proposition 2
Let and be two -rings and a homomorphism of into . Let be the homomorphism of into deduced from by passing to quotients.
a) One has , and is injective if and only if one has .
b) In order that be surjective, it is necessary and sufficient that be an isomorphism.
c) In order that be an isomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that be an isomorphism and that one have .
Let be an integer. We have , hence the relation implies and is equivalent to it if is injective. Therefore , with equality if is injective. If is not injective, there exists an integer such that the kernel of is the ideal of ; then , whence . This proves a).
Since and are fields, the homomorphism is injective. If is surjective, the same is true of , which is therefore an isomorphism. Conversely, suppose surjective. Then for every integer , the mapping induced by is surjective. Since is complete for the -adic filtration and separated for the -adic filtration, is surjective by Cor. 2 of Th. 1 of III, § 2, No. 8. This proves b).
Finally, c) follows from a) and b).
Proposition 3
Let be a projective system of rings relative to the set of indices . Suppose that is a -ring for every and that the homomorphisms are surjective. Then is a -ring, and for every , the canonical homomorphism is surjective and induces an isomorphism of onto .
Since the mappings are surjective, the same is true of the mappings (E, III, p. 58, prop. 5). Let us show that is a -ring. Let be the length of . By prop. 2, a), the sequence of the elements of is increasing; if it is stationary, there exists an integer such that is an isomorphism of onto whenever , so that , isomorphic to , is a -ring.
It is therefore enough to consider the case where each is finite, and where the sequence tends to . Endow the ring with the trivial filtration (III, § 2, No. 1, example 5). For , let be the kernel of ; put if . Let denote the -module endowed with the filtration . It is separated and complete, for the topology defined by the filtration is the projective limit topology of the discrete topologies on the .
Let k be an integer . We have (E, III, p. 55, formula (9)). Conversely, if and if one puts , the sequence is a decreasing sequence of nonempty closed affine parts of E. Since is an artinian C-module, the intersection of the is nonempty (III, § 2, No. 7, prop. 7); for every , one has . We have therefore proved that one has for every integer . In particular the ideal of C is closed for the topology . On C, the -adic topology is finer than the topology since one has . It then follows from TG, III, p. 26, cor. 1 to prop. 10, that C is separated and complete for the -adic topology. Moreover one has and therefore the surjective homomorphism from into deduced from is an isomorphism. This shows that the ideal of C is maximal and consequently that C is a -ring. The last assertion of prop. 3 follows from prop. 2, b).
2. Cohen Rings
Definition 2
Let A be a separated and complete local ring, whose residue field is of characteristic p. A Cohen subring of A means a subring C of A which is a -ring such that (i.e. ).
If C is a Cohen subring of A, the ideal of C is maximal, hence equal to . The canonical mapping of onto is therefore a field isomorphism.
Example
Let C be a -ring. The ring of formal series is a noetherian, local, separated and complete ring, whose maximal ideal is generated by the sequence . It is immediate that C is a Cohen subring of A. This applies in particular when C is equal to , to or to a field of characteristic .
Theorem 1
Let A be a local, separated and complete ring, whose residue field k is of characteristic p. Let be the canonical mapping of A onto k, and let S be a subset of A, such that induces a bijection of S onto a -basis of k (A, V, p. 95). a) There exists one and only one Cohen subring C of A containing S. b) The subring C of A is closed, and the -adic topology of C is induced by the -adic topology of A. c) Every closed subring of A, containing S, and such that , contains C.
A) Particular case: nilpotent
Let n be a positive integer such that . If is the nth Witt polynomial (, No. 1), the mapping is a ring homomorphism of into A (, No. 7). Let be the image of and let be the subring of A generated by .
Lemma 1
Let be a subring of containing . In order that contain , it is necessary and sufficient that one have .
One has and consists of the elements of the form with in . Hence one has , whence . But since is a -basis of , one has (A, V, p. 96), whence , that is to say .
Let be a subring of containing . If contains , we have
In the set of subrings of containing and such that , there exists by lemma 1 a smallest element , and one has for every integer such that .
One has by construction and is nilpotent. One obviously has and lemma 2 below therefore shows that is a maximal ideal of and consequently that is a Cohen subring of .
Lemma 2
One has .
Choose an integer such that , whence . Let be the subset of formed by the families of integers with finite support satisfying for every . Since contains for every , the monomials , where runs through , generate as a -module.
Moreover, from the formula
One has for sufficiently large, and assertion b) is therefore trivial. Assertion c) results from lemma 1. If is a Cohen subring of containing , one has from lemma 1. But since the inclusion of in induces an isomorphism of onto , one has (No. 1, prop. 2, b)), and this completes the proving of a).
B) General case
For every integer , let denote the local ring , let denote its maximal ideal, and let denote the canonical homomorphism of onto . By A), there exists a unique Cohen subring of containing . When , we denote by the canonical homomorphism of onto . By Corollary 2 of Proposition 1 of No. 1, is a -ring; one has , hence is equal to the Cohen subring of . By Proposition 3 of No. 1, the subring of is a -ring. Put . Since is the inverse image of under the isomorphism of onto , it is a closed subring of , and a -ring. One has for every (No. 1, Proposition 3), and in particular , that is to say . Therefore is a Cohen subring of .
For every integer , put . Since the local ring is separated, one has , and in view of the structure of the ideals of a -ring (No. 1, Proposition 1), every ideal of of the form contains one of the . Conversely, contains . Consequently, the -adic topology of is induced by the -adic topology of . This proves b).
Let be a closed subring of , containing and such that . Since is closed, one has . One has and , whence by what was seen in A). Finally, one has , whence . This proves c). One deduces the uniqueness of a Cohen subring as in A).
Remark
Suppose that is not nilpotent (this takes place in particular when is an integral ring whose field of fractions is of characteristic 0). Then is a discrete valuation ring whose field of fractions is of characteristic 0.
3. Existence and uniqueness of -rings
Proposition 4
Let and be two -rings such that , and let (resp. ) be the canonical homomorphism of (resp. ) onto (resp. ). Let (resp. ) be a family of elements of (resp. ) whose image under (resp. ) is a -basis of (resp. ). Let be an isomorphism of onto such that for every . Then there exists a unique homomorphism of into , such that and for every . It is surjective. If , it is an isomorphism.
Let us prove the existence of . Let be the subring of formed by the pairs such that . The mapping is a surjective homomorphism of rings from A onto . Its kernel , equal to , is therefore a maximal ideal of A. The topological subspace A of is closed in , hence complete, and the topology induced on A by that of is the -adic topology. Hence A is a separated complete local ring with maximal ideal (III, § 2, No. 13, Prop. 19). For every , we have by hypothesis; if is the class of modulo , the family is a -basis of the field . By theorem 1 of No. 2, there exists a Cohen subring of A, and only one, containing for every . We have . The restriction to of the projection of onto C is a homomorphism which induces an isomorphism of onto . By Prop. 2, c) of No. 2, is an isomorphism of onto C. One sees analogously that the restriction to of the projection of onto is a surjective homomorphism of onto . Hence, is the graph of a surjective homomorphism of C onto , and one obviously has , for every . Moreover, if , is an isomorphism.
Let us prove the uniqueness of . Let be a homomorphism of C into such that and for every , and let be the graph of . It is immediate that is a Cohen subring of A, containing for every , whence (theorem 1 of No. 2) and finally .
Proposition 5
Let k be a field of characteristic p, and let n be an integer , or . There exists a p-ring of length n whose residue field is isomorphic to k.
The ring of Witt vectors with coefficients in k is an integral separated complete local ring whose residue field is isomorphic to k (, no. 8, prop. 8), and one has (loc. cit., formula (52)). Let C be a Cohen subring of (no. 2, th. 1). Then C is a p-ring of length whose residue field is isomorphic to k, and, if n is an integer , the quotient is a p-ring of length n whose residue field is isomorphic to k.
Remark 1
Let n be an integer and S a p-basis of k. One can prove that the subring of generated by and by the elements (), is a p-ring of length n whose residue field is isomorphic to k (cf. p. 72, exerc. 10).
Remark 2
The reader will find in the Appendix a proof of prop. 5 which uses neither the results of , nor the existence theorem for Cohen subrings (no. 2, th. 1).
Corollary
Let C be a p-ring of finite length n. There exists a p-ring of infinite length such that C is isomorphic to .
By prop. 5, there exists a p-ring of infinite length such that is isomorphic to . Then is a p-ring of length n, and the field is isomorphic to , hence to . By prop. 4, the rings C and are therefore isomorphic.
4. Multiplicative Representatives
Proposition 6
Let C be a p-ring, whose residue field k be perfect. Suppose that C is of finite length n (resp. infinite). There exists a unique isomorphism (resp. ) which induces, by passing to quotients, the identical mapping of k.
Since (resp. ) is a p-ring with residue field k, and of length n (resp. of infinite length) (No. 1, Example 2), and since is a p-basis of the perfect field k, prop. 6 is a particular case of prop. 4 of No. 3.
Theorem 2
Let A be a separated complete local ring, k its residue field and the canonical homomorphism of A onto k. It is assumed that k is a perfect field of characteristic p.
a) There exists a unique ring homomorphism such that for in W(k).
b) The homomorphism u is continuous when W(k) is endowed with the -adic topology, and the image of u is the unique Cohen subring of A.
By th. 1 of No. 2, there exists a unique Cohen subring of A; let us denote it by C. Let u be a homomorphism of W(k) into A such that for every in W(k); it is immediate that the image of u is a Cohen subring of A, hence equal to C. The existence and uniqueness of u then result from prop. 6. The -adic topology of C is induced by the -adic topology of A (No. 2, th. 1, b)), whence the continuity of u.
For a direct construction of u, see p. 70, exerc. 6.
Proposition 7
Let us retain the hypotheses and notations of th. 2. There exists a unique multiplicative subset S of A such that induces a bijection of S onto k. In order that an element a of A belong to S, it is necessary and sufficient that for every , there exist an element of A such that . The set S is the set of elements of the form .
Let us first prove the uniqueness of S. Let S be a multiplicative subset of A, such that induces a bijection of S onto k. Let T be the set of elements of A which are -th powers for every .
a) One has : Let and ; since the field k is perfect, there exists an element of k such that ; since one has , there exists an element of S such that . One then has whence since the restriction of to S is injective.
b) The restriction of to T is injective: let a and b be two elements of T such that . Let ; there exist two elements and of A such that . We then have , whence , that is to say mod. . By Lemma 1 of § 1, No. 1, we have mod. that is to say mod. . Since n is arbitrary, we have .
Properties a) and b) above, together with the formula , imply the relation , whence uniqueness.
Let us now prove the existence of S. With the notation of Theorem 2, put , that is to say (§ 1, No. 6)
(2)
(3)
It is clear that the mapping is the identity mapping of . Therefore the image S of satisfies the conditions of Proposition 7.
The elements of S are often called the multiplicative (or Teichmüller) representatives of A.
Remark 1
Let us retain the preceding hypotheses and notation. We have
Remark 2
Let A be a separated and complete local ring, its residue field and the canonical homomorphism of A onto . It may be shown that there exists a multiplicative subset S of A (not unique in general) such that induces a bijection of S onto (cf. p. 72, Exercise 11).
Example 1
Let be a perfect field of characteristic . The multiplicative representatives of the ring are the Witt vectors for .
Example 2
Let A be an integral, separated and complete local ring. Suppose that the residue field of A is finite, with elements, hence perfect of characteristic . We have for every , whence for every multiplicative representative s. It follows that the set of multiplicative representatives consists of 0 and the -th roots of unity in the field of fractions of A. If the field of fractions of A is locally compact, the existence of multiplicative representatives also follows from VI, § 9, No. 2, Proposition 3 (cf. also VI, § 9, Exercise 5).
Example 3
More particularly, consider the case . Then the multiplicative representatives are 0 and the -th roots of unity in the field of fractions of .
5. Structure of complete noetherian local rings
Let and be complete noetherian local rings, and let be a local homomorphism of into , inducing by passing to quotients an isomorphism of onto . Let be a sequence generating the ideal of , and let be elements of . Put .
Lemma 3
a) There exists a unique homomorphism extending and mapping to for .
b) In order that be surjective, it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence generate the ideal of , or again that the classes of these elements modulo generate as a vector space over the field .
c) In order that make into a finite -algebra, it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence generate an ideal of definition of (the -adic topology of) .
Let denote the ideal of the ring generated by . Every homomorphism of into extending and such that maps into , and is therefore continuous when is endowed with the -adic topology. The existence and uniqueness of then result from A, IV, p. 26, Prop. 4.
The ring is a complete noetherian local ring (III, § 2, No. 10, Corollary 6 to Theorem 2 and No. 6, Proposition 6), whose maximal ideal is generated by . Hence and defines a homomorphism gr of into . Now the ring is generated by and , gr induces an isomorphism of onto , and the classes modulo of the elements generate as a vector space over ; moreover is surjective if and only if gr is surjective (III, § 2, No. 8, Corollary 2 to Theorem 1). This proves .
The ideal of generated by the sequence is none other than . Since contains , is a Zariski ring for the -adic topology. The ring is artinian if and only if its length as an -module is finite. But since every simple module over is annihilated by and since, by hypothesis, and are isomorphic, this occurs if and only if the dimension over the field of the vector space is finite. By IV, § 2, No. 5, Corollary 2 of Proposition 9, we see therefore that is an ideal of definition of if and only if the dimension of over is finite. This is indeed the case if is a finite -algebra.
Suppose that is an ideal of definition of . The -adic topology of the -module then coincides with the -adic topology of the ring , and is therefore separated. Since is a finitely generated module over , is a finitely generated -module (III, § 2, No. 3, Example 3 and No. 9, cor. 1 of Prop. 12). This proves .
Lemma 4
Suppose that the noetherian local ring C is regular, and that is a system of coordinates of C (VIII, § 5, No. 1, Def. 1).
a) If the sequence is secant for A (VIII, § 3, No. 2, Def. 1), the homomorphism is injective.
b) In order that v be injective and make A a finite algebra over B, it is necessary and sufficient that be a maximal secant sequence for A. Then A is of dimension .
In order that the sequence be a maximal secant sequence for A, it is necessary and sufficient that it generate an ideal of definition of A, and that A be of dimension (VIII, § 3, No. 2, Th. 1). By lemma 3, c), this comes to saying that A is a finite B-algebra, and a ring of dimension . Now C is a noetherian integral ring of dimension , hence is a noetherian integral ring of dimension (VIII, § 3, No. 4, cor. 3 of Prop. 8). If A is a finite B-algebra, and if is the kernel of , one has (VIII, § 2, No. 3, th. 1, c)); since B is an integral ring of finite dimension, one has if (VIII, § 1, No. 3, prop. 6, e)). Hence, if A is a finite B-algebra, is injective if and only if A is of dimension . This proves b).
Suppose that the sequence of elements of is secant. One can adjoin to it (VIII, § 3, No. 2, Th. 1) elements of in order to make it into a maximal secant sequence. From what precedes, there then exists an injective homomorphism of which extends and maps to for . Hence is injective. This proves a).
Theorem 3
Let A be a local, noetherian and complete ring whose residue field k is of characteristic p. Let C be a p-ring of infinite length, whose residue field is isomorphic to k (No. 3, Prop. 5).
a) Let m be the dimension of the vector space over the field k. There exists an ideal of the ring such that A is isomorphic to .
b) Let d be the dimension of A. Suppose that is not a divisor of 0 in A. Then there exists a subring of A isomorphic to and such that A is a finite algebra over .
Let be a Cohen subring of (No. 2, Theorem 1). Since is of infinite length, there exists a homomorphism of onto (No. 3, Proposition 4). Consequently, there exists a local homomorphism . Let us choose elements of whose classes form a basis of the vector space over the field . We have , and Lemma 3, b) proves the existence of a surjective homomorphism of onto , extending and mapping to for . This proves a).
Suppose that is not a divisor of in , hence is secant for (VIII, § 3, No. 2, Proposition 3). Then there exist (VIII, § 3, No. 2, Theorem 1) elements of such that the sequence is a maximal secant sequence for . The noetherian local ring is regular, and is a system of coordinates of . The assertion b) of Theorem 3 then follows from Lemma 4, b).
Exercises
In the exercises of § 2, is a fixed prime number. If is an ideal of a ring , denotes the ideal generated by the elements , where ranges over .
See the exercises for § 2.