Bourbaki

Exercise 33, § 1

Topological Vector Spaces, V, p. 67

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let E be a uniformly convex Banach space (V, p. 66, Exercise 31). There then exists a number θ\theta such that 34⩽θ<1\frac{3}{4} \leqslant \theta < 1 and such that the relation ∥x−y∥⩾12sup⁡(∥x∥,∥y∥)\|x - y\| \geqslant \frac{1}{2} \sup(\|x\|, \|y\|) in E entails ∥12(x+y)∥⩽θsup⁡(∥x∥,∥y∥)\| \frac{1}{2}(x + y) \| \leqslant \theta \sup(\|x\|, \|y\|). a) Let (xn)(x_n) be a sequence of points of E such that ∥xn∥⩽M\|x_n\| \leqslant M and which tends to 0 for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). Prove now that if for an index pp, one has ∥xp∥⩾12M\|x_p\| \geqslant \frac{1}{2}M, there exists q>pq > p such that ∥xp−xq∥>12M\|x_p - x_q\| > \frac{1}{2}M, and consequently ∥12(xp+xq)∥⩽θM\| \frac{1}{2}(x_p + x_q) \| \leqslant \theta M (reason by contradiction, observing that for x′∈E′x' \in E' such that ∥x′∥=1\|x'\| = 1, one has ⟨xp,x′⟩=lim⁡n→∞⟨xp−xn,x′⟩\langle x_p, x' \rangle = \lim_{n \to \infty} \langle x_p - x_n, x' \rangle). Deduce that there exists a strictly increasing mapping ℓ\ell of N\mathbf{N} into itself such that one has ∥12(xℓ(2n)+xℓ(2n+1))∥⩽Mθ\| \frac{1}{2}(x_{\ell(2n)} + x_{\ell(2n+1)}) \| \leqslant M\theta, so that if xn(1)=12(xℓ(2n)+xℓ(2n+1))x_n^{(1)} = \frac{1}{2}(x_{\ell(2n)} + x_{\ell(2n+1)}), the sequence (xn(1))(x_n^{(1)}) tends to 0 for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), and that ∥xn(1)∥⩽Mθ\|x_n^{(1)}\| \leqslant M\theta for every nn. b) Prove now that there exists a sequence (xnk)(x_{n_k}) extracted from (xn)(x_n) such that, if one sets y(k)=xnky(k) = x_{n_k}, it has the following property: for every integer p>1p > 1, every integer q<pq < p and every integer ii such that 1⩽i⩽2p−q1 \leqslant i \leqslant 2^{p-q},

∥y((i−1)2q+1)+y((i−1)2q+2)+⋯+y(i2q)∥⩽Mθq. \| y((i-1)2^q + 1) + y((i-1)2^q + 2) + \cdots + y(i2^q) \| \leqslant M\theta^q .
(Iterate the procedure of a) by forming from a sequence (xn(k))(x_n^{(k)}) a sequence (xn(k+1))(x_n^{(k+1)}) in the same way as (xn(1))(x_n^{(1)}) is formed from (xn)(x_n); then use a suitable “diagonal procedure”.) c) Let rr and qq be two integers >1> 1. Deduce from b) that if r2q⩽k⩽(r+1)2qr2^q \leqslant k \leqslant (r+1)2^q, one has
∥xn1+xn2+⋯+xnk∥⩽(2q−1)M+2qM+(r−1)2qMθq \| x_{n_1} + x_{n_2} + \cdots + x_{n_k} \| \leqslant (2^q - 1)M + 2^qM + (r-1)2^qM\theta^q
(decompose the sum on the left into several parts, letting hh vary from 1 to 2q2^q, then from (j−1)2q+1(j-1)2^q + 1 to j2qj2^q for 2⩽j⩽r2 \leqslant j \leqslant r, then from r2q+1r2^q + 1 to kk). d) Prove now that for every bounded sequence (xn)(x_n) in E, there exists an extracted sequence (xnk)(x_{n_k}) such that the sequence of means (xn1+⋯+xnk)/k(x_{n_1} + \cdots + x_{n_k})/k converges for the initial topology of E (Banach-Saks-Kakutani theorem). (Using the fact that E is reflexive, reduce to the case where the sequence (xn)(x_n) converges to 0 for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), and use c) for qq and rr sufficiently large.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6. Not checked by a person.