Bourbaki

Exercise 33, § 1

Topological Vector Spaces, V, p. 68

It is set in small type as supplementary.

Let E be a uniformly convex Banach space (V, p. 67, exerc. 31). Then there exists a number θ\theta such that 34≤θ<1\frac{3}{4} \leq \theta < 1 and such that the relation ∥x−y∥≥12sup⁡(∥x∥,∥y∥)\|x - y\| \geq \frac{1}{2} \sup (\|x\|, \|y\|) in E implies ∥12(x+y)∥≤θsup⁡(∥x∥,∥y∥)\| \frac{1}{2}(x + y) \| \leq \theta \sup (\|x\|, \|y\|). a) Let (xn)(x_n) be a sequence of points of E such that ∥xn∥≤M\|x_n\| \leq M and such that the sequence tends to 0 for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). Show that, if for an index p, ∥xp∥≥12Mp,\ \|x_p\| \geq \frac{1}{2} M, then there exists q>pq > p such that ∥xp−xq∥>12M\|x_p - x_q\| > \frac{1}{2} M, and consequently ∥12(xp+xq)∥≤θM\| \frac{1}{2}(x_p + x_q) \| \leq \theta M (argue by reductio ad absurdum, by observing that for all x′∈E′x' \in E' such that ∥x′∥=1\|x'\| = 1, we have ⟨xp,x′⟩=lim⁡n→∞⟨xp−xn,x′⟩\langle x_p, x' \rangle = \lim_{n \to \infty} \langle x_p - x_n, x' \rangle).

Deduce that there exists a strictly increasing mapping ℓ\ell from N\mathbf{N} into itself such that ∥12(xℓ(2n)+xℓ(2n+1))∥≤Mθ\| \frac{1}{2}(x_{\ell(2n)} + x_{\ell(2n+1)}) \| \leq M \theta, and such that if xn(1)=12(xℓ(2n)+xℓ(2n+1))x_n^{(1)} = \frac{1}{2}(x_{\ell(2n)} + x_{\ell(2n+1)}), the sequence (xn(1))(x_n^{(1)}) tends to 0 for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') and that ∥xn(1)∥≤Mθ\|x_n^{(1)}\| \leq M \theta for all nn. b) Show that there exists a sequence (xnk)(x_{n_k}) extracted from (xn)(x_n) such that, if we put y(k)=xnky(k) = x_{n_k}, we have the following property : for every integer p>1p > 1, every integer q<pq < p and every integer ii such that 1≤i≤2p−q1 \leq i \leq 2^{p-q},

∥y((i−1)2q+1)+y((i−1)2q+2)+⋯+y(i2q)∥≤Mθq. \| y((i-1)2^q + 1) + y((i-1)2^q + 2) + \cdots + y(i2^q) \| \leq M \theta^q .
(Iterate the procedure of a) by constructing a sequence (xn(k+1))(x_n^{(k+1)}) from the sequence (xn(k))(x_n^{(k)}) in the same way as (xn(1))(x_n^{(1)}) is constructed from (xn)(x_n); then use a suitable « method of diagonalization ».) c) Let rr and qq be two integers >1> 1. Deduce from b) that if r2q≤k≤(r+1)2qr2^q \leq k \leq (r+1)2^q, then
∥xn1+xn2+⋯+xnk∥≤(2q−1)M+2qM+(r−1)2qMθq \| x_{n_1} + x_{n_2} + \cdots + x_{n_k} \| \leq (2^q - 1)M + 2^q M + (r-1)2^q M \theta^q
(decompose the sum on the left into several subsets, by varying hh from 1 to 2q2^q, then from (j−1)2q+1(j-1)2^q + 1 to j2qj2^q for 2≤j≤r2 \leq j \leq r, then from r2q+1r2^q + 1 to kk). d) Show that for every bounded sequence (xn)(x_n) in E, there exists an extracted sequence (xnk)(x_{n_k}) such that the sequence of the averages (xn1+⋯+xnk)/k(x_{n_1} + \cdots + x_{n_k})/k converges for the initial topology of E (the Banach-Saks-Kakutani theorem). (Using the fact that E is reflexive, reduce to the case when the sequence (xn)(x_n) converges to 0 for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), and use c) for qq and rr large enough.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.