Bourbaki

Exercise 21, § 10

General Topology, I, p. 114

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

a) Let X be an accessible and locally quasi-compact space (I, p. 111, exerc. 30). Let X0X_0 be the discrete space having the same underlying set as X, and let X~0\tilde{X}_0 be the (compact) space of ultrafilters on X0X_0 (the discrete space X0X_0 being identified with an open subspace of X~0\tilde{X}_0) (I, p. 110, exerc. 27). In X~0\tilde{X}_0, let R (or R(X)R(X)) be the equivalence relation between ultrafilters U,V\mathfrak{U}, \mathscr{V}: “the sets of limit points of U\mathfrak{U} and of V\mathscr{V} in X are the same”. Now prove that the relation R is separated (use the description of the topology of X~0\tilde{X}_0 given in I, p. 110, exerc. 26 b), exerc. 7 b) of I, p. 100 and axiom (C’)); the compact space Xc=X~0/RX^c = \tilde{X}_0 / R is in one-to-one correspondence with the set of primitive sets of X (I, p. 100, exerc.7). If X is separated (and consequently locally compact), XcX^c identifies with X when X is compact, with the Alexandroff compactification of X when X is not compact.

b) Let Y be a closed subspace of X. The space of ultrafilters Y~0\tilde{Y}_0 on Y0Y_0 identifies with the closure of Y0Y_0 in X~0\tilde{X}_0, and the space YcY^c with the canonical image of Y~0\tilde{Y}_0 in XcX^c.

c) Now prove that the restriction to X0X_0 of the canonical mapping X~0→Xc\tilde{X}_0 \to X^c is a bijection of X0X_0 onto a subspace X∗cX^c_* of XcX^c, that the canonical mapping f:X∗c→Xf : X^c_* \to X is a continuous bijection and that the image by this mapping of every compact subset of X∗cX^c_* is a compact closed subset of X. (To see that ff is continuous, use b); observe moreover that the inverse image in X~0\tilde{X}_0 of a point of X∗cX^c_* is composed of ultrafilters on X having all a single limit point, and that if U\mathfrak{U} is an ultrafilter on X, its limit point in X~0\tilde{X}_0, when U\mathfrak{U} is considered as a basis of ultrafilter on X~0\tilde{X}_0, is U\mathfrak{U} considered as a point of X~0\tilde{X}_0.)

d) Let Z be the sum set of a countable family of spaces YnY_n identical to the space XS defined in exerc. 7 of I, p.101 , and of a set {ω}\{ \omega \} reduced to a point. A topology is defined on Z by taking as a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of a point z∈Ynz \in Y_n the filter of its neighbourhoods in the space YnY_n, and as a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of ω\omega the set of VnV_n, where VnV_n is the union of {ω}\{ \omega \} and of the YmY_m of index ≥n\geq n. The space Z thus defined is accessible, quasi-compact and locally quasi-compact; but the subspace Z∗cZ^c_* of ZcZ^c is not locally compact.

*e) Let Y be a second accessible and locally quasi-compact space, and let u be a continuous mapping from X into Y, such that the inverse image by u of every quasi-compact subset of Y is quasi-compact. If one considers u as a mapping from X∗cX^c_* into Y∗cY^c_*, now prove that u is continuous and extends (in a unique way) to a continuous mapping Xc→YcX^c \to Y^c. (First extend u to a continuous mapping from X~0\tilde{X}_0 into Y~0\tilde{Y}_0 and prove that it is compatible with the equivalence relations R(X)R(X) and R(Y)R(Y)).

f) Let X be the accessible quasi-compact and not locally quasi-compact space defined in exerc. 30 c) of I, p. 111. Now prove that in the corresponding space X~0\tilde{X}_0, the equivalence relation R(X)R(X) is not separated.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.