Exercise 21, § 10
General Topology, I, p. 114
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
a) Let X be an accessible and locally quasi-compact space (I, p. 111, exerc. 30). Let be the discrete space having the same underlying set as X, and let be the (compact) space of ultrafilters on (the discrete space being identified with an open subspace of ) (I, p. 110, exerc. 27). In , let R (or ) be the equivalence relation between ultrafilters : “the sets of limit points of and of in X are the same”. Now prove that the relation R is separated (use the description of the topology of given in I, p. 110, exerc. 26 b), exerc. 7 b) of I, p. 100 and axiom (C’)); the compact space is in one-to-one correspondence with the set of primitive sets of X (I, p. 100, exerc.7). If X is separated (and consequently locally compact), identifies with X when X is compact, with the Alexandroff compactification of X when X is not compact.
b) Let Y be a closed subspace of X. The space of ultrafilters on identifies with the closure of in , and the space with the canonical image of in .
c) Now prove that the restriction to of the canonical mapping is a bijection of onto a subspace of , that the canonical mapping is a continuous bijection and that the image by this mapping of every compact subset of is a compact closed subset of X. (To see that is continuous, use b); observe moreover that the inverse image in of a point of is composed of ultrafilters on X having all a single limit point, and that if is an ultrafilter on X, its limit point in , when is considered as a basis of ultrafilter on , is considered as a point of .)
d) Let Z be the sum set of a countable family of spaces identical to the space XS defined in exerc. 7 of I, p.101 , and of a set reduced to a point. A topology is defined on Z by taking as a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of a point the filter of its neighbourhoods in the space , and as a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of the set of , where is the union of and of the of index . The space Z thus defined is accessible, quasi-compact and locally quasi-compact; but the subspace of is not locally compact.
*e) Let Y be a second accessible and locally quasi-compact space, and let u be a continuous mapping from X into Y, such that the inverse image by u of every quasi-compact subset of Y is quasi-compact. If one considers u as a mapping from into , now prove that u is continuous and extends (in a unique way) to a continuous mapping . (First extend u to a continuous mapping from into and prove that it is compatible with the equivalence relations and ).
f) Let X be the accessible quasi-compact and not locally quasi-compact space defined in exerc. 30 c) of I, p. 111. Now prove that in the corresponding space , the equivalence relation is not separated.
Solution
No solution has been written yet.