Exercise 21, § 10
General Topology, I, 154
Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
(*) a) Let be an accessible space which is locally quasi-compact (\S 9, Exercise 29). Let be the discrete space which has the same underlying set as , and let be the (compact) ultrafilter space of (the discrete space being identified with an open subspace of ) (\S 9, Exercise 26). On , let [or ] be the following equivalence relation between ultrafilters : "the sets of limit points of and in are the same". Show that is Hausdorff [use the description of the topology of given in \S 9, Exercise 25 b), Exercise 7 b) of \S 7 and axiom (C')]. The compact space is in one-to-one correspondence with the set of primitive subsets of (\S 7, Exercise 7). If is Hausdorff (and therefore locally compact) then can be identified with if is compact, and with the one-point compactification of if is not compact
b) Let be a closed subspace of . The ultrafilter space can be identified with the closure of in , and with the canonical image of in .
c) Show that the restriction to of the canonical mapping is a bijection of onto a subspace of , that the canonical mapping is a continuous bijection, and that the image under this mapping of any compact subset of is a closed compact subset of . [To show that is continuous, use b); also remark that the inverse image in of a point of consists of all the ultrafilters on which have a single given limit point, and that if is an ultrafilter on , then its limit point in , when is regarded as an ultrafilter base on , is regarded as a point of ].
d) Let be the set which is the sum of a countable number of spaces each identical with the space defined in Exercise 7 of § 8 and a set consisting of a single point. Define a topology on by taking as a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of a point its neighbourhood filter in the space , and as fundamental system of neighbourhoods of the set of subsets of , where is the union of and the where . The space so defined is accessible, quasi-compact and locally quasi-compact; but the subspace of is not locally compact.*
e) Let be another locally quasi-compact accessible space, and let be a continuous mapping of into , such that the inverse image under of each quasi-compact subset of is quasi-compact. Regarding as a mapping of into , show that is continuous and can be
(*) The results in this exercise and in Exercise 7 of § 7 are due to J. Fell.
(unicely) extended to a continuous mapping . [First extend to a continuous mapping of into and show that the extension is compatible with the equivalence relations ].
f) Let be the quasi-compact, not locally quasi-compact, accessible space defined in Exercise 29 c) of § 9. Show that in the corresponding space the equivalence relation is not Hausdorff.
Solution
No solution has been written yet.