Bourbaki

Exercise 12, § 3

General Topology, IX, p. 101

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let KK be a separated topological field and non-discrete. Let RR be the set of x∈Kx \in K such that lim⁡n→∞xn=0\lim_{n \to \infty} x^n = 0, and NN the complement of the set R∪R−1R \cup R^{-1}. Now prove that, in order that there exist on KK an absolute value defining the topology of KK, it is necessary and sufficient that: 1° RR be open in KK; 2° for every neighbourhood VV of 0 in KK, there exist a neighbourhood UU of 0 in KK such that R⋅U⊂VR \cdot U \subset V; 3° if x∈Rx \in R and y∈R∪Ny \in R \cup N, then yx∈Ryx \in R.

To establish that these conditions are sufficient, we shall show successively that:

(a) NN is a normal subgroup of the multiplicative group K∗K^* of the elements ≠0\neq 0 of KK.

(b) In the quotient group K∗/NK^*/N, put x˙≤y˙\dot{x} \leq \dot{y} if there exist x∈x˙x \in \dot{x} and y∈y˙y \in \dot{y} such that yx−1∈R∪Nyx^{-1} \in R \cup N; show that this relation is an ordered relation compatible with the group structure of K∗/NK^*/N, and that the ordered group K∗/NK^*/N thus defined is isomorphic to a subgroup of the additive group R\mathbf{R} (use VV, p. 16, exerc. 1 of § 3).

(c) Conclude using exerc. 11.

In particular, the topology of a locally compact non-discrete commutative field can be defined by an absolute value (cf. INT, VII, § 2, exerc. 4 and AC, VI, § 9).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.