Bourbaki

Exercise 28, § 4

General Topology, IX, p. 108

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

a) Let YY be a compact space, XX a subspace of YY, UU an open neighbourhood of the diagonal Δ\Delta in X×XX \times X, VV an open subset of X×YX \times Y such that V∩(X×X)=UV \cap (X \times X) = U. Now prove that if, in X×YX \times Y, the closed sets Δ\Delta and CVC V are normally separated (IX, p. 87, exer. 15) then UU is an entourage of the universal structure of XX (use IX, p. 84, exer 4).

b) Let XX be a completely regular space. Now prove that the following conditions are equivalent:

α) XX is paracompact.

β) The product of XX and every compact space is normal.

γ) If a filter F\mathscr{F} on XX is such that, for every continuous mapping ff of XX into a metrizable space MM, f(F)f(\mathscr{F}) has an adherent point in MM, then F\mathscr{F} has an adherent point in XX.

(Using aa), now prove first that condition β\beta implies that the neighbourhoods of the diagonal Δ\Delta in X×XX \times X form a fundamental system of entourages of the universal uniform structure Uomega\mathscr{U}_omega. To prove that β\beta implies γ\gamma, reason by contradiction: consider a compact space ZZ containing XX (for example βX\beta X) and the set AA of points adherent to F\mathscr{F} in ZZ, and note that there exists a neighbourhood UU of Δ\Delta in Z×XZ \times X such that U‾\overline{U} does not meet A×XA \times X. Let dd be a continuous distance on XX such that the set of (x,y)∈X×X(x, y) \in X \times X such that d(x,y)<1d(x, y) < 1 is contained in UU; let XdX_d be the metric space associated with dd (IX, p. 11), f:X→Xdf : X \to X_d the canonical mapping. By applying the assumption γ\gamma to f(F)f(\mathscr{F}), now prove that there would exist on XX a filter R\mathfrak{R} finer than F\mathscr{F}, having an adherent point in ZZ not contained in AA. To see that γ\gamma implies α\alpha), reason by contradiction, supposing that there is a covering R\mathscr{R} of XX without a finer locally finite open covering; the set of complements of the finite unions of sets of R\mathscr{R} is then a filter basis B\mathscr{B} without adherent point; there exists consequently a continuous mapping ff of XX into a metrizable space MM such that f(B)f(B) has no adherent point. The exteriors of the sets of f(B)f(\mathscr{B}) then form an open covering of MM; using the fact that MM is paracompact, form a locally finite open covering of XX finer than R\mathscr{R}, contradicting the assumption.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.