Bourbaki

Exercise 20, § 2

General Topology, X, p. 47

Let XX be a locally compact metric space, GG a group of homeomorphisms of XX, equicontinuous and discrete for the topology of simple convergence (equal to the topology of compact convergence on GG).

(a) Now prove that if there exists a point x∈Xx \in X and a sequence (un)(u_n) of distinct elements of GG such that the sequence of the un(x)u_n(x) is convergent, then there exists a sequence (vn)(v_n) of distinct elements of GG such that lim⁡n→∞vn(x)=x\lim_{n \to \infty} v_n(x) = x. Deduce that there then exist two compact neighbourhoods K, L of x such that vn(K)⊂Lv_n(K) \subset L for all n.

(b) The hypotheses on GG do not imply that GG is proper at at least one point of XX (Exercise 19 c)). We say that GG is K-discrete for a compact subset K of XX, if GG is discrete for the topology of uniform convergence in K (or, equivalently, for the topology of simple convergence in K). Now prove that if GG is K-discrete for every compact subset K of XX, GG operates properly in XX (use a)).

(c) Suppose that GG is uniformly equicontinuous and that XX is connected (therefore of countable type (IX, p. 95, Exercise 17)); now prove that GG operates properly in XX. (Using X, p. 45, Exercise 13 d), show that if a sequence (vn)(v_n) of distinct elements of GG were such that lim⁡n→∞vn(x)=x\lim_{n \to \infty} v_n(x) = x for a x∈Xx \in X, there would exist a subsequence of (vn)(v_n) tending to the identity for the discrete topology). Give an example where X is connected but G is not K-discrete for every compact subset of X (take for X the union, in R2\mathbf{R}^2, of the segments −1≤x≤1,y=0-1 \leq x \leq 1, y = 0 and x=0,0≤y≤1x = 0, 0 \leq y \leq 1).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.