Bourbaki

Exercise 14, § 2

Commutative Algebra, V, 366

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

(a) Let AA be a subring of the field KK and xx an element ≠0\neq 0 of KK. Show that, if xx is not integral over AA, there exists a maximal ideal of A[x−1]A[x^{-1}] which contains x−1x^{-1} and that, for every maximal ideal mm of A[x−1]A[x^{-1}] containing xx, the ideal A∩mA \cap m is maximal in AA (observe that xx does not belong to the ring A[x−1]A[x^{-1}]).

(b) Let AA be a local integral domain, mm its maximal ideal, KK a field containing AA and kk the residue field of AA. Let x∈Kx \in K be such that x∉Ax \notin A and suppose that AA is integrally closed in the ring A[x]A[x]. Show that there exists an AA-algebra homomorphism A[x]→k[X]A[x] \to k[X] which extends the canonical homomorphism A→kA \to k and which maps xx to XX. (It is necessary to prove that, if ∑i=0naixi=0\sum_{i=0}^n a_i x^i = 0, where ai∈Aa_i \in A for all ii, then all the aia_i belong to mm. Otherwise there would be a relation anxn−p+…+ap=−(ap+1x−1+…+a0x−p)a_n x^{n-p} + \ldots + a_p = -(a_{p+1} x^{-1} + \ldots + a_0 x^{-p}), where apa_p is invertible in AA; using Exercise 5 of § 1, show that the common value bb of the two sides belongs to AA and, using (a), show that necessarily b∈mb \in m; conclude that x−1x^{-1} would be integral over AA, which is absurd.)

(c) Under the hypotheses of (b), show that the ideal mA[x]mA[x] of A[x]A[x] is prime and not maximal.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.