Bourbaki

Exercise 7, § 1

Commutative Algebra, VI, 442

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let R be a ring. An ordered pair (A, p) consisting of a subring A of R and a prime ideal p of A is called maximal in R if there exists no ordered pair (A', p') consisting of a subring A' of R and a prime ideal p' of A' such that A⊂A′,A′≠AA \subset A', A' \neq A and p′∩A=pp' \cap A = p.

(a) For every subring B of R and every prime ideal q of B there exists an ordered pair (A, p), maximal in R, such that A⊃BA \supset B and q=p∩Bq = p \cap B.

(b) For an ordered pair (A, p) to be maximal in R, it is necessary and sufficient that, for all s∈R−As \in R - A, there exist a finite family of elements ci∈pc_i \in p (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) such that the element b=c1s+c2s2+…+cnsnb = c_1 s + c_2 s^2 + \ldots + c_n s^n belongs to A−pA - p (use Chapter 11, § 2, no. 5, Corollary 3 to Proposition 11).

(c) Show that, if the ordered pair (A, p) is maximal in R, the product of two elements of R−AR - A belongs to R−AR - A. (Ifs, s' are in R−AR - A and ss′=a∈Ass' = a \in A, consider the least integers n,mn, m such that there exists ci∈pc_i \in p (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) for which b=∑icisi∈A−pb = \sum_i c_i s^i \in A - p and cj′∈pc'_j \in p (1≤j≤m1 \leq j \leq m) for which

b′=∑jcj′s′j∈A−p; b' = \sum_j c'_j {s'}^j \in A - p;

supposing for example n≥mn \geq m, consider the product bb′∈A−pbb' \in A - p and obtain a contradiction from the definition of the integer nn.)

(d) Under the hypotheses of (c), we write S=R−AS = R - A; show that the ideal p1p_1 of A consisting of the a∈Aa \in A such that there exists s∈Ss \in S for which sa∈Asa \in A is contained in p (use (b)). A fortiori the ideals p0p_0 of A consisting of the a∈Aa \in A such that sa∈Asa \in A for all s∈Ss \in S is contained in p (Exercise 6 (b)). We write A′=A/p0,p′=p/p0A' = A/p_0, p' = p/p_0 and R′=R/p0R' = R/p_0; the ordered pair (A', p') is then maximal in the integral domain RR and, for all non-zero a′∈A′a' \in A', there exists s′∈S′=R′−A′s' \in S' = R' - A' such that s′a′∈S′s'a' \in S'.

(e) Let (A,p)(A, p) be a maximal ordered pair in the integral domain RR such that, for all non-zero a∈Aa \in A, there exists s∈S=R−As \in S = R - A such that sa∈Ssa \in S. We write S0=S∪{1}S_0 = S \cup \{1\} and denote by RR, the ring of fractions S0−1RS_0^{-1}R; the canonical homomorphism R→RR \to R, is injective and therefore identifies RR with a subring of R0R_0. Show that RR, is a field identified with the field of fractions of RR. Let (B,q)(B, q) be a maximal ordered pair in R0R_0 such that B⊇AB \supseteq A and q∩A=pq \cap A = p. Show that B∩R=AB \cap R = A; in other words, AA is the intersection of RR and a valuation ring of RR, and pp is the intersection of AA and the maximal ideal of this valuation ring.

(f) Let K0K_0 be a field, AA, the polynomial ring K0[X]K_0[X], BB the ring of formal power series A0[[Y]]A_0[[Y]] and RR the ring of fractions BYB_Y consisting of the formal power series Y−hf(Y)Y^{-h}f(Y), where f∈Bf \in B and h≥0h \geq 0. Let PP be the prime ideal YBYB of formal power series without constant term, A=K0+pA = K_0 + p, which is a subring of BB. Show that AA is the intersection of RR and a valuation ring CC of the field of fractions KK of RR and pp the intersection of AA and the maximal ideal of CC; moreover, the field of fractions of AA is equal to that of RR and every a≠0a \neq 0 in AA is of the form s−1s′s^{-1}s', where s,s′s, s' are in S=R−AS = R - A. However, the ordered pair (A,p)(A, p) is not maximal in RR.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.