Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.
Let K be a field, w a valuation on K, Γ the value group of w and k the residue field of w. We form the corresponding field S(Γ,k) and preserve the notation of Exercise 2. For all t∈k, let t0 be an element of the class t in the valuation ring of w; for all a∈Γ, let ua0 be an element of K such that w(ua0)=a.
(a) Let M be a subset of S(Γ,k) containing the elements tua for every ordered pair (t,a)∈k×Γ; suppose that there exists a bijection x↦x0 of M onto a subset M0 of K and that the following conditions are fulfilled: (1) (tua)0=t0ua0 for every ordered pair (t,a)∈k×Γ; (2) if x=(xα) belongs to M and Cx is the well-ordered subset of Γ consisting of the a such that xα=0, then for every segment D of Cx the element (xλ)λ∈D belongs to M; (3) if x,y are two elements of M and tua is the dominant term of x−y, then w(x0−y0−t0ua0)>w(x0−y0). If z′ is an element of K not belonging to M0, show that there exists an element z∈/M in S(Γ,k) such that the mapping which coincides with x↦x0 on M and maps z′ to z also satisfies the above conditions. (Note that, if w(z′)=α, there exists a t0 such that
w(z′−t0uα0)>a; write
zα=tuα, then show by transfinite induction that the
zβ of index
β>α may be determined so that
z=(zλ)λ∈Γ solves the problem.) (b) Deduce from (a) that
Card(K)≤Card S(Γ,k).