Bourbaki

Exercise 5, § 5

Commutative Algebra, VI, 455

(a) Let K be a field, vv a valuation on K and Γ\Gamma the order group of vv. For K to be linearly compact (Chapter III, § 2, Exercise 15) with the topology Tv\mathscr{T}_v, it is necessary and sufficient that, for every well-ordered subset B of Γ\Gamma and every family (aβ)β∈B(a_\beta)_{\beta \in B} of elements of K such that, for A<μ<vA < \mu < v,

v(aλ−aμ)<v(aμ−av), v(a_\lambda - a_\mu) < v(a_\mu - a_v),

there exists an element a∈Ka \in K such that v(a−aλ)=v(aλ−a)v(a - a_\lambda) = v(a_\lambda - a) for every ordered pair of indices A,μA, \mu such that μ>A\mu > A. (Use Exercise 4 of Set Theory,

Chapter 111, § 2). If this is so, the ring A of the valuation v is also linearly compact with the discrete topology.

(b) Show that the field S(\Gamma, k) = K defined in § 3, Exercise 2 is linearly compact with Tv\mathscr{T}_v. Take \Gamma to be the totally ordered group \mathbf{Q} of rational numbers and consider the subring K_0 of K consisting of the x=(xα)x = (x_\alpha) such that the set of a∈Qa \in \mathbf{Q} for which x,#0x, \# 0 is finite or is the set of points of a strictly increasing sequence tending to +∞+\infty. Show that K_0 is a field which is complete with respect to the valuation v0v_0 induced by the canonical valuation v on K and that v0v_0 has the same value group and residue field as v but that K_0 is not linearly compact (cf. § 10, Exercise 2).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.