Bourbaki

Appendix

Pseudomodules

1. Adjunction of a unit element to a pseudo-ring

Let A be a pseudo-ring (I, § 8, no. 1). On the set A′=Z×AA' = \mathbf{Z} \times A we define the following laws of composition:

{(m,a)+(n,b)=(m+n,a+b)(m,a)(n,b)=(mn,mb+na+ab). \begin{cases} (m, a) + (n, b) = (m + n, a + b) \\ (m, a)(n, b) = (mn, mb + na + ab). \end{cases}

It is immediately verified that A′A' with these two laws of composition is a ring in which the element (1,0)(1, 0) is the unit element. The set {0}×A\{0\} \times A is a two-sided ideal of A′A' and i:x↦(0,x)i : x \mapsto (0, x) is an isomorphism of the pseudo-ring A onto the sub-pseudo-ring {0}×A\{0\} \times A by means of which A and {0}×A\{0\} \times A are identified. A′A' is called the ring derived from the pseudo-ring A by adjoining a unit element.

If A already has an identity element ε\varepsilon, the element e=(0,ε)e = (0, \varepsilon) of A′A' is an idempotent belonging to the centre of A′A' and such that

A=eA′=A′e. A = eA' = A'e.

Then (eA′,(1−e)A′)(eA', (1 - e)A') is a direct decomposition (I, § 8, no. 11) of A′A' and the ring (1−e)A′(1 - e)A' is isomorphic to Z\mathbf{Z}.

2. Pseudomodules

Given a pseudo-ring A with or without a unit element, a left pseudomodule over A is a commutative group E (written additively) admitting A as set of operators and satisfying axioms (MI),(MII)(\mathrm{M}_I), (\mathrm{M}_{II}) and (MIII)(\mathrm{M}_{III}) of § 1, no. 1, Definition 1. Right pseudomodules over A are defined similarly.

Let A′A' be the ring obtained by adjoining a unit element to A. If E is a left pseudomodule over A, a left A′A'-module structure on E is associated with it by writing, for all x∈Ex \in E and every element (n,a)∈A′(n, a) \in A',

(n,a).x=nx+ax. (n, a) . x = nx + ax.

Axioms (MI)(\mathrm{M}_I) to (MIV)(\mathrm{M}_{IV}) of § 1, no. 1, Definition 1 are immediately verified;

moreover, by restricting the set of operators of this module structure to {0}×A\{0\} \times A (identified with AA), we obtain on EE the pseudomodule structure given initially.

For a subset MM of EE to be a subgroup with operators of the pseudomodule EE (in which case the induced structure is obviously also a left pseudomodule structure over AA), it is necessary and sufficient that MM be a submodule of the associated A′A'-module EE and this sub-A′A'-module is associated with the pseudomodule MM. Moreover, the quotient A′A'-module E/ME/M is then associated with the quotient group with operators E/ME/M, which is obviously a pseudomodule over AA.

If E,FE, F are two pseudomodules over AA, the homomorphisms E→FE \to F of groups with operators are identical with the A′A'-linear mappings E→FE \to F of the A′A'-modules associated respectively with the pseudomodules EE and FF. If (Ei)i∈I(E_i)_{i \in I} is a family of pseudomodules over AA, the groups with operators ∏i∈IEi\prod_{i \in I} E_i and ⨁i∈IEi\bigoplus_{i \in I} E_i are pseudomodules over AA and the associated A′A'-modules are respectively the product and direct sum of the associated A′A'-modules EiE_i. There are analogous results for inverse and direct limits of pseudomodules. The theory of pseudomodules over AA can thus be entirely reduced to that of A′A'-modules.

Exercises

See the exercises for Appendix 0.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.