Bourbaki

Exercise 11, § 2

Algebra, VI, p. 40

Let KK be an ordered field and GG a subfield of KK. a) Show that x≠0x \neq 0 is infinitely large with respect to GG if and only if x−1x^{-1} is infinitely small with respect to GG. We say that KK is comparable to GG if there is no element of KK which is infinitely large with respect to GG (nor, consequently, any nonzero element of KK which is infinitely small with respect to GG). A necessary and sufficient condition for KK to be comparable to its prime subfield Q\mathbf{Q} is that KK be archimedean (VI, p. 35, Ex. 31), \* and hence that KK be isomorphic to a subfield of R\mathbf{R} (VI, p. 36, Ex. 33c)). ■ b) Show that, in the ring F(G)F(G) of elements of KK which are not infinitely large with respect to GG, the set I(G)I(G) of elements infinitely small with respect to GG is a maximal ideal; moreover the ordering on the quotient field K(G)=F(G)/I(G)K(G) = F(G)/I(G) induced from that of F(G)F(G) is compatible with the ring structure and is total. c) Show that a class modulo I(G)I(G) can contain at most one element of GG; deduce that the natural map from GG to K(G)K(G) is an isomorphism from the ordered field GG onto a subfield G′G' of K(G)K(G), and that K(G)K(G) is comparable to G′G'.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.