Bourbaki

Exercise 24, § 2

Algebra, VI, p. 43

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let K be a maximal ordered field; consider an ordering on the field K(X)K(X) of rational functions which makes it an ordered extension of K. Show that this ordering is determined by the set A of x∈Kx \in K such that x<Xx < X (show that the sign of every polynomial f over K is determined by A, using Prop. 9 of VI, p. 28). Conversely, show that to every set A⊂KA \subset K such that y∈Ay \in A whenever y≤xy \leq x and x∈Ax \in A, there corresponds an ordering of K(X)K(X) making it an ordered extension of K and such that A is the set of x∈Kx \in K such that x<Xx < X (same method). When A has a greatest element, or ∁A\complement A has a least element, or when A=KA = K or A=∅A = \varnothing, then the corresponding ordering of K(X)K(X) is such that K(X)K(X) is not comparable to K. On the other hand, if neither A nor ∁A\complement A is empty, and there is no greatest element in A nor least element in ∁A\complement A, then K(X)K(X) is comparable to K.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.