Bourbaki

Exercise 10, § 2

Algebra, VII, p. 56

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

u) Let MM be a nn-primary module with no nonzero elements of infinite height and let NN be a pure submodule of MM generated by a maximal pseudofree family of elements of MM (Ex. 4 and 7, b)). Show that M/NM/N is a divisible module (argue by contradiction, applying Ex. 8, c), Ex. 7, c), Ex. 7, b), and finally Ex. 4, c)).

b) Consider the metrisable topology T\mathscr{T} on M defined by taking as a basis of neighbourhoods of 0 the submodules πnM\pi^n M for all integers n≥0n \geq 0 (Gen. Top., III, p. 5). Then the quotient M/PM/P of M by a submodule P is divisible if and only if P is everywhere dense in M under the topology T\mathscr{T}.

c) Let P1,P2P_1, P_2 be two submodules of M which are pure, everywhere dense in M under the topology T\mathscr{T}, and direct sums of cyclic submodules. Show that P1P_1 and P2P_2 are isomorphic (notice that P1/πnP1P_1 / \pi^n P_1 is isomorphic to M/πnMM / \pi^n M for all n).

d) Let M be the completion of M with respect to the topology T\mathscr{T} (Gen. Top., III, p. 24). Show that x↦αxx \mapsto \alpha x is a strict morphism from M onto αM^\alpha \hat{M} for all a∈Aa \in A, that πnM^\pi^n \hat{M} is an open and closed submodule, and the closure of πnM\pi^n M, for all nn, and that the quotient modules M^/πnM^\hat{M} / \pi^n \hat{M}, M/πnMM / \pi^n M are isomorphic.

e) Let M be the torsion submodule of M˙\dot{M}: show that M is a =-primary module, that M=M‾M = \overline{M}, and that M is a pure submodule of M.

f) Suppose the π\pi-primary module M is the direct sum of a family (Ei)(E_i) of cyclic submodules. Then T\mathscr{T} is discrete if and only if the annihilator of M is 0. In this case, let E be the product module ∏Ea\prod E_a and let F be the submodule of E consisting of elements all but countably many of whose coordinates are zero; show that M can then be identified (as a non-topological module) with the submodule of F consisting of (xi)(x_i) such that, for each integer nn, there are only finitely many indices α\alpha for which xα∉πnEαx_\alpha \notin \pi^n E_\alpha. Then show that the four modules M, M^\hat{M}, M and F are distinct. Deduce that M is not a direct sum of cyclic modules (use e)), and that it is not a direct sum of indecomposable modules (notice that M‾\overline{M} contains no elements of infinite height, and apply Ex. 8, c)).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.