Bourbaki

Exercise 11, § 4

Tag 03LO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03LO].

Theory of Sets, III, 234

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let A be a set and let R\mathfrak{R} be a subset of the set F(A)\mathfrak{F}(A) of finite subsets of A. R\mathfrak{R} is said to be mobile if it satisfies the following condition :

(MO) If X, Y are two distinct elements of R\mathfrak{R} and if z∈X∩Yz \in X \cap Y, then there exists Z⊂X∩YZ \subset X \cap Y belonging to R\mathfrak{R} such that z∉Zz \notin Z.

A subset P of A is then said to be pure if it contains no set belonging to R\mathfrak{R}.

(a) Show that every pure subset of A is contained in a maximal pure subset of A.

(b) Let M be a maximal pure subset of A. Show that for each x∈∁Mx \in \complement M there exists a unique finite subset EM(x)E_M(x) of M such that EM(x)∪{x}∈RE_M(x) \cup \{x\} \in \mathfrak{R}. Moreover, if y∈EM(x)y \in E_M(x), the set (M∪{x})−{y}(M \cup \{x\}) - \{y\} is a maximal pure subset of A.

(c) Let M, N be two maximal pure subsets of A, such that N∩∁MN \cap \complement M is finite. Show that Card (M) = Card (N). (Proof by induction on the cardinal of N∩∁MN \cap \complement M, using (b).)

(d) Let M, N be two maximal pure subsets of A, and put N′=N∩∁MN' = N \cap \complement M, M′=M∩∁NM' = M \cap \complement N. Show that

M′⊂⋂x∈N′EM(x).M' \subset \bigcap_{x \in N'} E_M(x).

\* Deduce that Card (M) = Card (N) (by virtue of (c), we are reduced to the case where N' and M' are infinite; show then that Card (M') ⩽\leqslant Card (N')). \*

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.