Bourbaki

§ 6. Borel’s graph theorem

1. Borel’s graph theorem

Theorem 1

— Let E be a locally convex space which is the inductive limit of Banach spaces, F a Souslin locally convex space, for example a Lusin space (GT, IX, § 6, No. 2 and No. 4), and u a linear mapping from E into F. If the graph of u is a Borel subset of E × F, then u is continuous.

Let E_i be a family of Banach spaces, and (u_i) a family of continuous linear mappings u_i : E_i → E such that the topology of E is the finest locally convex topology for which the u_i are continuous. It is enough to prove that the composed mappings u ∘ u_i are continuous, or in fact (GT, IX, § 2, No. 6, prop. 10) that the restriction of u ∘ u_i to every closed subspace G of E_i satisfying the first axiom of countability is continuous. The graph of this restriction is the inverse image of the graph of u under the continuous mapping u_i × Id_F : G × F → E × F, hence is a Borel set in G × F. In addition, G × F is a Souslin space and every Borel subset of a Souslin space is a Souslin space (GT, IX, § 6, No. 3, prop. 10). Th. 1 then follows from th. 4, GT, IX, § 6, No. 8.

Remark

Recall (III, p. 12) that every homological Hausdorff and semi-complete space, for example every Fréchet space, is the inductive limit of Banach spaces. \* This is also true for the strong dual of a reflexive Fréchet space (IV, p. 23, prop. 4). \

2. Locally convex Lusin spaces

Proposition 1

— Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space. Suppose that there exists a sequence (E_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of Fréchet spaces satisfying the first axiom of countability, and continuous linear mappings u_n : E_n → E such that E = \bigcup_{n \in \mathbf{N}} u_n(E_n). Then E is a Lusin space.

Let P_n be the kernel of u_n; then u_n defines a bijective continuous mapping from the quotient space E_n/P_n onto u_n(E_n). Since E_n/P_n is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability (GT, IX, § 3, No. 1), hence a polish space (GT, IX, § 6, No. 1, def. 1), u_n(E_n) is a Lusin subspace of E (GT, IX, § 6, No. 4, prop. 11). Therefore by GT, IX, § 6, No. 7, cor. of th. 3, the space E, which is regular (GT, III, § 3, No. 1) is a Lusin space.

Example 1

Every Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability is a polish space, hence a Lusin space. Consequently, so are the spaces C(X)\mathscr{C}(X), where X is locally compact and has a countable base (the topology of C(X)\mathscr{C}(X) being that of compact convergence, cf. GT, X, § 3, No. 3, corollary and § 1, No. 6, cor. 3); \* the spaces C0∞(U)\mathscr{C}_0^\infty(U), where U is an open subset of Rn\mathbf{R}^n (III, p. 9) and H(U)\mathscr{H}(U), where U is an open subset of Cn\mathbf{C}^n (III, p. 10).

Prop. 1 shows that the spaces C0∞(U)\mathscr{C}_0^\infty(U), where U is an open set in Rn\mathbf{R}^n, Gs(I)\mathscr{G}_s(I), where I is a compact interval in R\mathbf{R} and s≥1s \geq 1, and H(K)\mathscr{H}(K), where K is a compact subset of Cn\mathbf{C}^n are all Lusin spaces (III, p. 10). \

Theorem 2

— Let E be a locally convex space, which is the inductive limit of an increasing sequence (En)n∈N(E_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of subspaces of E, endowed with the topologies of Fréchet spaces satisfying the first axiom of countability. Suppose that every compact subset of E is contained in one of the EnE_n and is compact in this space. Let F be a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability. Then the space Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is a Lusin space.

The space E is bornological (III, p. 12), hence the space Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is complete (III, p. 23, prop. 12). The linear mapping j:f↦(f∣En)n∈Nj : f \mapsto (f|E_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} is an injection from Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) into the product space ∏n∈NLc(En;F)\prod_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathscr{L}_c(E_n; F); by virtue of the hypothesis on the compact subsets of E and the definition of the S\mathfrak{S}-topologies, jj is an isomorphism from Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) onto its image (endowed with the topology induced by the product topology); moreover, since Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is complete, this image is a closed subspace of ∏n∈NLc(En;F)\prod_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathscr{L}_c(E_n; F) (GT, II, § 3, No. 4, prop. 8). By GT, IX, § 6, No. 4, it is therefore enough to prove that each of the spaces Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is a Lusin space. For the rest of the proof, we shall assume that E is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability.

Since F is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability, it is isomorphic to a closed subspace of a countable product of Banach spaces FnF_n, each of which is a quotient of F (II, p. 5), hence satisfies the first axiom of countability. The linear mapping j′:f↦(prn∘f)n∈Nj' : f \mapsto (\mathrm{pr}_n \circ f)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} is an injection from Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) into the product space ∏n∈NLc(E;Fn)\prod_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathscr{L}_c(E; F_n), and by using the definition of the S\mathfrak{S}-topologies and of the open sets in a product, j′j' is an isomorphism from Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) onto its image; moreover, since Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is complete, this image is a closed subspace of ∏n∈NLc(E;F)\prod_{n \in \mathbf{N}} \mathscr{L}_c(E; F). Therefore it is enough to prove that each of the spaces Lc(E;Fn)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F_n) is a Lusin space (GT, IX, § 6, No. 4), and consequently, we can assume that F is a Banach space satisfying the first axiom of countability.

The space Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is the union of a countable family of equicontinuous and closed subsets (III, p. 19, cor. 1 and GT, X, § 2, No. 3, prop. 6). But every equicontinuous subset H of Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is metrizable and satisfies the first axiom of countability (III, p. 18, prop. 6 and GT, X, § 2, No. 4, th. 1); if H is closed, then it is a complete space for the uniform structure induced by that of Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F), since the latter is complete In other words, H is a polish space, and a fortiori a Lusin space; consequently the regular space Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E; F) is a Lusin space (GT, IX, § 6, No. 7, cor. of th. 3).

Corollary

— The hypotheses on E being as in th. 2, assume, in addition that every bounded subset of E is relatively compact. Then the strong dual of E is a Lusin space. *In particular, the strong dual of a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability, which is also a Montel space, is a Lusin space.

\* Example 2. — Let U be an open subset of Rn\mathbf{R}^n. The corollary applies in particular to the Fréchet space E=Cc∞(U)E = \mathscr{C}_c^\infty(U); its dual Cc−∞(U)\mathscr{C}_c^{-\infty}(U) (the space of distributions with compact support on U) is then a Lusin space.

The space Cc∞(U)\mathscr{C}_c^\infty(U) is a strict inductive limit of a sequence of Fréchet spaces CKn∞(U)\mathscr{C}_{K_n}^\infty(U) satisfying the first axiom of countability (III, p. 9). We can show that each of the spaces CKn∞(U)\mathscr{C}_{K_n}^\infty(U) is a Montel space; in addition, every bounded subset of Cc∞(U)\mathscr{C}_c^\infty(U) is contained in one of the spaces CKn∞(U)\mathscr{C}_{K_n}^\infty(U) (III, p. 5, prop. 6). We can then apply the corollary of th. 2. Then the dual Cc−∞(U)\mathscr{C}_c^{-\infty}(U) of Cc∞(U)\mathscr{C}_c^\infty(U) (the space of distributions on U) is a Lusin space for the strong topology.

Similarly we prove that for every open subset U of Cn\mathbf{C}^n, and for every compact subset K of Cn\mathbf{C}^n, the strong dual of H(U)\mathscr{H}(U) and the strong dual of H(K)\mathscr{H}(K) are Lusin spaces. \*

Remark

— Let E be as in th. 2; let F be a Hausdorff locally convex space which is the union of the images of a sequence of continuous linear mappings un:Fn→Fu_n : F_n \to F, where each FnF_n is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability; then Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E ; F) is a Lusin space. As in prop. 1, we first reduce to the case where each unu_n is injective; then, as in the proof of th. 2, we can assume that E is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability. Then, by I, p. 20, prop. 1, L(E;F)\mathscr{L}(E ; F) is the union of the L(E;Fn)\mathscr{L}(E ; F_n); moreover, the canonical injection Lc(E;Fn)→Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E ; F_n) \to \mathscr{L}_c(E ; F) is continuous (GT, X, § 1, No. 4, prop. 3). Since each of the spaces Lc(E;Fn)\mathscr{L}_c(E ; F_n) is a Lusin space by th. 2, L(E;Fn)\mathscr{L}(E ; F_n) is also a Lusin space for the topology induced by that of Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E ; F) (GT, IX, § 6, No. 4, prop. 11); consequently Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}_c(E ; F) is a Lusin space by virtue of GT, IX, § 6, No. 7, corollary of th. 3.

\*3. Measurable linear mappings on a Banach space 1^1

Proposition 2

— *Let E be a Banach space, F a locally convex space and u a linear mapping from E into F. Assume that for every closed subset B of F, every compact subset X of E and every measure μ\mu on X, the intersection X∩u−1(B)X \cap u^{-1}(B) is μ\mu-measurable. Then u is continuous.

First assume that F is the base field. For every compact subset X of E and every measure μ\mu on X, the restriction of uu to X is μ\mu-measurable (INT, IV). Suppose that uu is not continuous. Then we can find a sequence of points (xn)(x_n) in E such that ∑n∥xn∥<∞\sum_n \| x_n \| < \infty and ∣u(xn)∣≥n|u(x_n)| \geq n for every integer nn. Consider the mapping g:(tn)↦∑ntnxng : (t_n) \mapsto \sum_n t_n x_n from the cube C=[0,1]NC = [0, 1]^{\mathbf{N}} into E; it is clear that gg is continuous. Hence f=u∘gf = u \circ g is measurable for every measure on C (INT, V); in particular for the measure μ\mu which is the product of Lebesgue measures on the factors of C. Hence there exists a compact subset D of C such that μ(D)>12\mu(D) > \frac{1}{2} and such that the restriction of ff to D is continuous, hence also bounded. Let M be the upper bound of ∣f∣|f| on D and let p∈Np \in \mathbf{N} be such that p≥4Mp \geq 4M. Let s=(sn)s = (s_n) and t=(tn)t = (t_n) be two points of D such that sn=tns_n = t_n for all n≠pn \neq p. Then

f(s)−f(t)=u(∑nsnxn−∑ntnxn)=(sp−tp)u(xp). f(s) - f(t) = u(\sum_n s_n x_n - \sum_n t_n x_n) = (s_p - t_p) u(x_p) .

Since ∣f(s)−f(t)∣≤2M|f(s) - f(t)| \leq 2M and ∣u(xp)∣≥p≤4M|u(x_p)| \geq p \leq 4M, we get

∣sp−tp∣≤12. |s_p - t_p| \leq \frac{1}{2} .

The Lebesgue-Fubini theorem (INT, V, 2nd ed., § 8, No. 3, cor. 2 of prop. 7) implies that μ(D)≤12\mu(D) \leq \frac{1}{2}; this gives a contradiction. Hence uu is continuous.

In the general case, for every v∈F′v \in F', the linear form v∘uv \circ u is continuous, by the preceding argument. Let (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a sequence of points of E tending to 0; then the sequence (u(xn))n∈N(u(x_n))_{n \in \mathbf{N}} tends to 0 in F, if F is assigned the topology σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F'); hence this sequence is bounded for σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F') and so it is bounded in F (III, p. 27, cor. 3). Since E is bornological (III, p. 12, prop. 2); the linear mapping u:E→Fu : E \to F is continuous. \*

1^1 The results of this section depend on the book of Integration.

Exercises

Exercises

See the exercises for § 6.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.