Bourbaki

§ 5. Compactness criteria

1. General remarks

Let A be a subset of a topological space E. For a sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of points of A to have a point x of E as a limit point, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition is satisfied (GT, I, § 7, No. 3) :

(A) For every integer m≥0m \geq 0 and every neighbourhood U of x, there exists an integer n≥mn \geq m such that xn∈Ux_n \in U.

A sequence of the form (yk)k∈N(y_k)_{k \in \mathbf{N}} with yk=xnky_k = x_{n_k} for a strictly increasing sequence (nk)k∈N(n_k)_{k \in \mathbf{N}} of positive integers is called an extracted sequence of the sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}}. If there exists an extracted sequence of the sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} which converges to x, then x is a limit point of (xn)(x_n); conversely, if x has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods, and x is the limit point of the sequence (xn)(x_n), then there exists an extracted sequence of (xn)(x_n) converging to x.

On account of GT, IX, § 2, No. 9, corollary, we conclude that when E is metrizable, the following conditions are equivalent : a) the set A is relatively compact in E ; b) every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E ; c) from every infinite sequence of points of A, we can extract a sequence which converges to a point of E.

In this section, we shall extend this criterion to certain non metrizable topological vector spaces. The following proposition enables us to reduce the study of compact sets to that of weakly compact sets in a number of cases.

Proposition 1

— Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space, and A a subset of E. Let EσE_\sigma denote the space E with the weakened topology. a) If every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E, then A is precompact in E. b) In order that A be relatively compact in E, it is necessary and sufficient that it is precompact in E and relatively compact in EσE_\sigma.

We shall prove a) by reductio ad absurdum. If A is not precompact, then by th. 3 of GT, II, § 3, No. 7, it follows that there exists a symmetric convex neighbourhood V of 0 in E such that A cannot be covered by a finite number of translates of V.

In other words, if x0,x1,...,xn−1x_0, x_1, ..., x_{n-1} are points of A, then A∉⋃0≤i<n(xi+V)A \notin \bigcup_{0 \leq i < n} (x_i + V) and so there exists a point xnx_n of A such that xn−xi∉Vx_n - x_i \notin V for 0≤i<n0 \leq i < n. Then, by induction on the integer nn, we can construct an infinite sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of points of A such that xn−xm∉Vx_n - x_m \notin V whenever n>mn > m; since V is symmetric, we also have xm−xn∉Vx_m - x_n \notin V for m≠nm \neq n and the sets xn+12Vx_n + \frac{1}{2} V are disjoint. For every point xx in E, there exists at most one integer n≥0n \geq 0 such that xn∈x+12Vx_n \in x + \frac{1}{2} V, hence the sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} does not have any limit point. This proves a).

Now suppose that A is precompact in E and is contained in a compact subset B of EσE_\sigma. Then B is complete in EσE_\sigma, hence also in E (IV, p. 5, Remark 2). We have A‾⊂B\overline{A} \subset B, hence A is relatively compact in E. The converse is evident and b) follows.

2. Simple compactness of sets of continuous functions

In this section, X denotes a compact space and Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X) the space of continuous functions on X, with values in the field K (equal to R\mathbf{R} or C\mathbf{C}). The space Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X) is assigned the topology of simple convergence on X.

Proposition 2

Let D be a dense subset of X and A a subset of the space Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). The following conditions are equivalent :* (i) A is relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). (ii) From every infinite sequence of elements of A, we can extract a sequence converging in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). (iii) Every infinite sequence of elements of A has a limit point in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). (iv) *Let (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a sequence of functions belonging to A and (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m \in \mathbf{N}} a sequence of points of D. If the iterated limits

γ=lim⁡m→∞lim⁡n→∞fn(xm),δ=lim⁡n→∞lim⁡m→∞fn(xm) \gamma = \lim_{m \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_m), \quad \delta = \lim_{n \to \infty} \lim_{m \to \infty} f_n(x_m)

exist, then they are equal. In addition, we have sup⁡f∈A∣f(x)∣<+∞\sup_{f \in A} |f(x)| < + \infty for all x∈Xx \in X.

(i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii) : let A‾\overline{A} be the closure of A in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). Assume that A is compact, and consider a sequence of functions fn∈Af_n \in A (for n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}). Let ϕ\phi be the continuous mapping x↦(fn(x))n∈Nx \mapsto (f_n(x))_{n \in \mathbf{N}} from X into the metrizable space KNK^\mathbf{N}. The image X′X' of X under ϕ\phi is a compact metrizable space, since X is compact. Let E be the closed subspace of Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X) consisting of continuous functions ff on X such that the relation ϕ(x)=ϕ(y)\phi(x) = \phi(y) implies f(x)=f(y)f(x) = f(y) for every pair of points x,yx, y in X. By cor. 2 of GT, I, § 9, No. 4 and prop. 3 of GT, I, § 5, No. 2, the mapping f′↦f′∘ϕf' \mapsto f' \circ \phi is a homeomorphism ϕ∗\phi^* from Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X') onto E. Hence the set A′=(ϕ∗)−1(A‾)A' = (\phi^*)^{-1}(\overline{A}) is compact in Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X'), and it is clear that there exist elements fn′f'_n in A′A' such that ϕ∗(fn′)=fn′∘ϕ\phi^*(f'_n) = f'_n \circ \phi is equal to fnf_n.

Since X′X' is a compact metrizable space, there exists a countable dense subset D' in X′X' (GT, IX, § 2, No. 8, prop. 12 and § 2, No. 9, prop. 16). Let T1\mathscr{T}_1 (resp. T2\mathscr{T}_2) be the topology on A′A' induced by the topology of simple convergence on D' (resp. X′X'). Then T1\mathscr{T}_1 is metrizable, T2\mathscr{T}_2 is compact and finer than T1\mathscr{T}_1, hence T1\mathscr{T}_1 and T2\mathscr{T}_2 coincide; in other words, A′A' is a compact metrizable subspace of Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X'). Therefore, there exists a sequence (fnk′)(f'_{n_k}) extracted from (fn′)(f'_n) and converging to an element f′f' of Cs(X′)\mathscr{C}_s(X'). Therefore, the sequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) converges to f=f′∘ϕf = f' \circ \phi in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X).

(ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii) : this is clear.

(iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iv) : suppose that every infinite sequence of elements of A has a limit point in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). Let x∈Xx \in X. The mapping ϕx:f↦f(x)\phi_x : f \mapsto f(x) from A into K is continuous. Consequently, every infinite sequence in ϕx(A)\phi_x(A) has a limit point; since the field K (equal to R\mathbf{R} or C\mathbf{C}) is metrizable, the set ϕx(A)\phi_x(A) is relatively compact in K, hence bounded. In other words, we have sup⁡f∈A∣f(x)∣<∞\sup_{f \in A} |f(x)| < \infty.

Let fn,xm,γf_n, x_m, \gamma and δ\delta be as in (iv). Let ff be a limit point of the sequence (fn)(f_n) in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X), and let xx be a limit point of the sequence (xm)(x_m) in the compact space X. For every mm, the mapping h↦h(xm)h \mapsto h(x_m) from Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X) into K is continuous. In view of the hypotheses, we have f(xm)=lim⁡n→∞fn(xm)f(x_m) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_m), and hence γ=lim⁡m→∞f(xm)\gamma = \lim_{m \to \infty} f(x_m); since f:X→Kf : X \to K is continuous and xx is a limit point of the sequence (xm)(x_m), we get γ=f(x)\gamma = f(x). In an analogous way, we prove the equality δ=f(x)\delta = f(x), whence γ=δ\gamma = \delta.

(iv) ⇒\Rightarrow (i) : suppose that the set of numbers f(x)f(x), as ff ranges over A, is bounded in K for all x∈Xx \in X. This is equivalent to assuming that the closure A‾\overline{A} of A in the product space KXK^X is compact (GT, I, § 9, No. 5). Suppose that A is not relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). This means that there exists a function u∈A‾u \in \overline{A} and a point a∈Xa \in X such that uu is not continuous at aa. Hence there exists a real number ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that in every neighbourhood U of aa, there exists a point xx with ∣u(x)−u(a)∣≥ε|u(x) - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon.

We shall construct by induction a sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of points in D and a sequence (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of elements of A, satisfying the following relations :

(1)m_m

∣u(xm)−u(a)∣≥εform≥1; |u(x_m) - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon \quad \text{for} \quad m \geq 1 ;

(2)m_m

∣u(xi)−fm(xi)∣≤1m+1for0≤i≤m−1; |u(x_i) - f_m(x_i)| \leq \frac{1}{m + 1} \quad \text{for} \quad 0 \leq i \leq m - 1 ;

(3)m,i_{m,i}

∣fm(xi)−fm(a)∣≤1i+1for0≤m≤i. |f_m(x_i) - f_m(a)| \leq \frac{1}{i + 1} \quad \text{for} \quad 0 \leq m \leq i .

We take x0=ax_0 = a with f0f_0 arbitrary in A (the set A is not empty, otherwise it will be relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X)). Let n≥1n \geq 1 and x0,x1,...,xn−1,f0,f1,...,fn−1x_0, x_1, ..., x_{n-1}, f_0, f_1, ..., f_{n-1} satisfy relations (1)m_m, (2)m_m for 1≤m<n1 \leq m < n and (3)m,i_{m,i} for 0≤m≤i<n0 \leq m \leq i < n. Since uu belongs to A‾\overline{A}, there exists fn∈Af_n \in A satisfying (2)n_n. Let VnV_n be the set of all x∈Xx \in X such that ∣fm(x)−fm(a)∣≤1n+1|f_m(x) - f_m(a)| \leq \frac{1}{n + 1} for 0≤m≤n0 \leq m \leq n. Since fnf_n is continuous, VnV_n is a neighbourhood of aa; choose a point xnx_n in D∩VnD \cap V_n such that ∣u(xn)−u(a)∣≥ε|u(x_n) - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon, hence (1)n_n and (3)m,n_{m,n} are satisfied. Therefore, the construction can be continued.

Since u(X)u(X) is a compact subset of K, there exists a sequence (yk)(y_k) extracted from (xm)(x_m) and such that the limit γ=lim⁡k→∞u(yk)\gamma = \lim_{k \to \infty} u(y_k) exists. By (2)m_m, we have u(xi)=lim⁡n→∞fn(xi)u(x_i) = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_i) for all i∈Ni \in \mathbf{N}, hence

(4)

γ=lim⁡k→∞lim⁡n→∞fn(yk). \gamma = \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(y_k) .

On the other hand we have fn(a)=lim⁡i→∞fn(xi)f_n(a) = \lim_{i \to \infty} f_n(x_i) by (3)m,i_{m,i} hence fn(a)=lim⁡k→∞fn(yk)f_n(a) = \lim_{k \to \infty} f_n(y_k). Since x0=ax_0 = a, we deduce from (2)m_m that lim⁡n→∞fn(a)=u(a)\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(a) = u(a). Consequently,

u(a)=lim⁡n→∞lim⁡k→∞fn(yk). u(a) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \lim_{k \to \infty} f_n(y_k) .

Finally, from (1)m_m, we get ∣γ−u(a)∣≥ε|\gamma - u(a)| \geq \varepsilon, and so γ≠u(a)\gamma \neq u(a). This contradicts assertion (iv); we have thus proved that (iv) implies (i).

3. The Eberlein and Šmulian theorems

Theorem 1 (Eberlein)

— *Let E be a Hausdorff and quasi-complete locally convex space, T\mathscr{T} a topology on E which is compatible with the duality between E and E' and A a subset of E. For A to be relatively compact for T\mathscr{T}, it is necessary and sufficient that every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E for T\mathscr{T}.

The condition stated is obviously necessary.

Suppose now that every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point for T\mathscr{T}, hence also for the coarser topology σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). Then A is precompact for T\mathscr{T} (IV, p. 32, prop. 1); in order that A be relatively compact for T\mathscr{T}, it is necessary and sufficient that it be so for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') (loc. cit.). Therefore it is enough to prove the theorem when T\mathscr{T} is the weakened topology σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E').

Let E^\hat{E} denote the completion of E, which we shall identify as usual with a subspace of the algebraic dual E′∗{E'}^* of E' (III, p. 21, th. 2). Let EσE_\sigma, E^σ\hat{E}_\sigma and Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^* denote the spaces E, E^\hat{E} and E′∗{E'}^* endowed with the topologies σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), σ(E^,E′)\sigma(\hat{E}, E') and σ(E′∗,E′)\sigma({E'}^*, E') respectively.

Let (xi′)i∈I(x'_i)_{i \in I} be a basis of the vector space E' over the field K. The mapping f↦(f(xi′))i∈If \mapsto (f(x'_i))_{i \in I} is a homeomorphism ϕ\phi from Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^* onto KIK^I; for every i∈Ii \in I, the image of A under the mapping xi′x'_i from E into K is relatively compact : for, K is metrizable and every infinite sequence of elements of xi′(A)x'_i(A) has a limit point. It follows that ϕ(A)\phi(A) is relatively compact in KIK^I, hence that the closure A‾\overline{A} of A in Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^* is compact.

Next we shall prove that A‾\overline{A} is contained in E^\hat{E}. Let H be an equicontinuous subset of E'; let X be its closure for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E); X is compact (III, p. 17, cor. 2). For every x∈E′∗x \in {E'}^*, let ϕx\phi_x be the restriction of x′↦⟨x,x′⟩x' \mapsto \langle x, x' \rangle to X; let A~⊂Cs(X)\tilde{A} \subset \mathscr{C}_s(X) be the set of functions ϕx\phi_x as x ranges over A. In view of the hypothesis on A, every infinite sequence of elements of A~\tilde{A} has a limit point in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X); by prop. 2 (IV, p. 33), the set A~\tilde{A} is therefore relatively compact in Cs(X)\mathscr{C}_s(X). It follows that for every a∈A‾a \in \overline{A}, the function ϕa\phi_a on X is continuous. The inclusion A‾⊂E^\overline{A} \subset \hat{E} then follows from th. 2 of III, p. 21.

Now we shall show that A‾\overline{A} is contained in E. Since A is precompact in EσE_\sigma (IV, p. 32, prop. 1), it is bounded in EσE_\sigma (III, p. 3, prop. 2), hence also in E (IV, p. 1, prop. 1). Let C be the closed convex balanced envelope of A in E. Then C is bounded since A is bounded, hence complete since E is quasi-complete. In other words, C is a convex and closed subset of E^\hat{E}, so also of E^σ\hat{E}_\sigma (IV, p. 1, prop. 1). Since A⊂CA \subset C and the topology of E^σ\hat{E}_\sigma is induced by that of Eσ′∗{E_\sigma'}^*, we have A‾⊂C\overline{A} \subset C, and hence A‾⊂E\overline{A} \subset E.

Since the topology of EσE_\sigma is induced by that of Eσ′∗{E'_\sigma}^*, the subset A‾\overline{A} of EσE_\sigma is compact, and th. 1 follows.

Theorem 2 (Šmulian). — Let E be a Fréchet space and A a subset of E. Let EσE_\sigma denote the space E endowed with the weakened topology. The following conditions are equivalent :

(i) A is relatively compact in EσE_\sigma; (ii) every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in EσE_\sigma; (iii) from every infinite sequence of points of A, we can extract a sequence which converges in EσE_\sigma.

The equivalence of (i) and (ii) follows from Eberlein’s theorem and (iii) obviously implies (ii).

We shall prove that (i) implies (iii). Suppose that the closure B of A in EσE_\sigma is compact and that (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} is a sequence of points of A. Let F denote the smallest closed vector subspace of E containing the xnx_n, this is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability. Since F is closed in EσE_\sigma and the topology σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F') on F is induced by σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), the set B∩FB \cap F is compact for σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F'). On account of the remarks in IV, p. 32, the existence of a sequence extracted from (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} converging for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') (or, which is the same, for σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F')) is a consequence of the following lemma :

Lemma 1

— *Let F be a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability. Every subset C of F which is compact for the topology T\mathscr{T} induced by σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F') is metrizable for this topology.

Since the topology of precompact convergence on F′F' is finer than the topology σ(F′,F)\sigma(F', F), there exists an everywhere dense countable subset in Fs′F'_s (III, p. 18, cor. 1). Hence the set C can be identified with a subset of KDK^D, and the topology induced on C by that of KDK^D, which is metrizable (GT, IX, § 2, No. 8) is coarser than the topology induced by σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F'), for which C is compact. Hence these two topologies are identical (GT, I, § 9, No. 4, cor. 3).

Šmulian’s theorem can be extended to the case where E is the strict inductive limit of a sequence of Fréchet spaces (IV, p. 67, exerc. 2).

\*4. The case of spaces of bounded continuous functions*

For every topological space X, let Cb(X)\mathscr{C}^b(X) denote the Banach space of all continuous and bounded mappings from X into K, with the norm defined by

∥f∥=sup⁡x∈X∣f(x)∣ \| f \| = \sup_{x \in X} |f(x)|

(GT, X, § 3, No. 2). When X is compact, every continuous function on X is bounded (GT, IV, § 6, No. 1), and we write C(X)\mathscr{C}(X) for Cb(X)\mathscr{C}^b(X).

In this and the following section, we shall use the following lemma, which is a particular case of Lebesgue’s theorem (INT, IV, 2nd ed. § 4, No. 3, th. 2) on account of the interpretation of the elements of C(X)′\mathscr{C}(X)' as measures on X.

Lemma 2

Let X be a compact space. If a sequence (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} is bounded in C(X)C(X) and converges simply on X to a continuous function f, then μ(f)=lim⁡n→∞μ(fn)\mu(f) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \mu(f_n) for every μ\mu in C(X)′C(X)'.

Proposition 3

Let X be a compact space, and let A be a bounded subset of C(X)C(X). For A to be relatively compact for the topology of simple convergence, it is necessary and sufficient that it is relatively compact for σ(C(X),C(X)′)\sigma(C(X), C(X)').

The topology of simple convergence is Hausdorff and coarser than σ(C(X),C(X)′)\sigma(C(X), C(X)'), hence the condition stated is sufficient (GT, I, § 9, No. 4, cor. 3).

Now suppose that A is relatively compact for the topology of simple convergence. Let (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a sequence of elements of A. By prop. 2 (IV, p. 33), there exists a sequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) extracted from (fn)(f_n) and converging simply to a continuous function f. By lemma 2, the bounded sequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) tends to f for σ(C(X),C(X)′)\sigma(C(X), C(X)'). Then Šmulian’s theorem (IV, p. 36, th. 2) shows that A is relatively compact for σ(C(X),C(X)′)\sigma(C(X), C(X)').

Corollary

Let S be a topological space and A a bounded subset of Cb(S)C^b(S). The following conditions are equivalent : (i) A is relatively compact for σ(Cb(S),Cb(S′))\sigma(C^b(S), C^b(S')); (ii) if (fn)n∈N(f_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} is a sequence of elements of A and (xm)m∈N(x_m)_{m \in \mathbf{N}} is a sequence of points of S such that the iterated limits

γ=lim⁡m→∞lim⁡n→∞fn(xm),δ=lim⁡n→∞lim⁡m→∞fn(xm) \gamma = \lim_{m \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x_m), \quad \delta = \lim_{n \to \infty} \lim_{m \to \infty} f_n(x_m)
exist, then γ=δ\gamma = \delta.

Let X be the Stone-Čech compactification of S (GT, IX, § 1, No. 6) and α\alpha the canonical mapping from S into X. Put D = α(S)\alpha(S). The mapping ϕ:f↦f∘α\phi : f \mapsto f \circ \alpha is an isomorphism from the normed space C(X)C(X) onto the normed space Cb(S)C^b(S); put A~=ϕ−1(A)\tilde{A} = \phi^{-1}(A). Since X is compact and D is dense in X, the prop. 2 (IV, p. 33) shows that condition (ii) is equivalent to the compactness of A~\tilde{A} for the topology of simple convergence. The equivalence of (i) and (ii) then follows from prop. 3. \*

\*5. Convex envelope of a weakly compact set

Theorem 3 (Krein)

Let E be a Hausdorff and quasi-complete locally convex space, and let T\mathscr{T} be a topology on E compatible with the duality between E and E'. Let A be a subset of E which is compact for T\mathscr{T}. Then the closed convex balanced envelope C of A is compact for T\mathscr{T}.

We shall first make several reductions. A) The set C is precompact for T\mathscr{T} (II, p. 25, prop. 3), and A is compact for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). On account of prop. 1 (IV, p. 32), it is enough to prove that C is compact for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), and so we have reduced to the case where T=σ(E,E′)\mathscr{T} = \sigma(E, E'). B) Since C is precompact and closed for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), it is bounded and closed for the initial topology of E (III, p. 3, prop. 2 and IV, p. 1, prop. 1); hence it is complete since E is quasi-complete. In other words, C is the closed convex balanced envelope of AA in the completion E^\hat{E} of EE. Since the topology σ(E^,E′)\sigma(\hat{E}, E') induces σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') on EE, we have reduced to the case when EE is complete.

C) Let Γ\Gamma be the convex balanced envelope of AA. Then CC is the closure of Γ\Gamma for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). By Eberlein’s theorem (IV, p. 35, th. 1), it is enough to prove that every sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} of points of Γ\Gamma has a limit point for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') in EE. But xnx_n belongs to the convex balanced envelope of a finite subset BnB_n of AA. Let FF be the closed vector subspace of EE generated by the countable set B=⋃nBnB = \bigcup_n B_n. Then FF is complete, the topology σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F') on FF is induced by σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') and we have xn∈Fx_n \in F for all n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}. Hence it is enough to prove that (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} has a limit point for σ(F,F′)\sigma(F, F'), which gives the reduction to the case when there exists a countable dense set in EE.

Let AA be assigned the topology induced by σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'), which makes it a compact space. We define a linear mapping u:E′→C(A)u : E' \to \mathscr{C}(A) by

u(x′)(a)=⟨a,x′⟩(a∈A,x′∈E′). u(x')(a) = \langle a, x' \rangle \quad (a \in A, x' \in E') .

Let (xn′)n∈N(x'_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be an equicontinuous sequence in E′E', converging to 0 for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E). Then the sequence of functions u(xn′)u(x'_n) is bounded in C(A)\mathscr{C}(A) and converges simply to 0. For every μ∈C(A)′\mu \in \mathscr{C}(A)', we have lim⁡n→∞μ(u(xn′))=0\lim_{n \to \infty} \mu(u(x'_n)) = 0 by lemma 2 (IV, p. 37). By the criterion given in the remark in III, p. 21, the linear form μ∘u\mu \circ u on E′E' is then continuous for σ(E′,E)\sigma(E', E) for every μ∈C(A)′\mu \in \mathscr{C}(A)'. Hence there exists a linear mapping v:C(A)′→Ev : \mathscr{C}(A)' \to E satisfying the relation

⟨u(x′),μ⟩=⟨v(μ),x′⟩(x′∈E′,μ∈C(A)′). \langle u(x'), \mu \rangle = \langle v(\mu), x' \rangle \quad (x' \in E', \mu \in \mathscr{C}(A)') .

It is clear that vv is continuous if C(A)′\mathscr{C}(A)' is assigned the topology σ(C(A)′,C(A))\sigma(\mathscr{C}(A)', \mathscr{C}(A)) and EE the topology σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E').

The unit ball (closed) BB of the Banach space C(A)\mathscr{C}(A) is compact for the topology σ(C(A)′,C(A))\sigma(\mathscr{C}(A)', \mathscr{C}(A)) (III, p. 17, cor. 3). Consequently, v(B)v(B) is a convex balanced and compact subset of EE for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E'). For every a∈Aa \in A, the continuous linear form εa:f↦f(a)\varepsilon_a : f \mapsto f(a) on C(A)\mathscr{C}(A) belongs to BB, and we have v(εa)=av(\varepsilon_a) = a by formulas (7) and (8). Hence, A⊂v(B)A \subset v(B), and so C⊂v(B)C \subset v(B). This proves that CC is compact for σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E').

Q.E.D.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 5.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.