§ 5. Compactness criteria
1. General remarks
Let A be a subset of a topological space E. For a sequence of points of A to have a point x of E as a limit point, it is necessary and sufficient that the following condition is satisfied (GT, I, § 7, No. 3) :
(A) For every integer and every neighbourhood U of x, there exists an integer such that .
A sequence of the form with for a strictly increasing sequence of positive integers is called an extracted sequence of the sequence . If there exists an extracted sequence of the sequence which converges to x, then x is a limit point of ; conversely, if x has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods, and x is the limit point of the sequence , then there exists an extracted sequence of converging to x.
On account of GT, IX, § 2, No. 9, corollary, we conclude that when E is metrizable, the following conditions are equivalent : a) the set A is relatively compact in E ; b) every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E ; c) from every infinite sequence of points of A, we can extract a sequence which converges to a point of E.
In this section, we shall extend this criterion to certain non metrizable topological vector spaces. The following proposition enables us to reduce the study of compact sets to that of weakly compact sets in a number of cases.
Proposition 1
— Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space, and A a subset of E. Let denote the space E with the weakened topology. a) If every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E, then A is precompact in E. b) In order that A be relatively compact in E, it is necessary and sufficient that it is precompact in E and relatively compact in .
We shall prove a) by reductio ad absurdum. If A is not precompact, then by th. 3 of GT, II, § 3, No. 7, it follows that there exists a symmetric convex neighbourhood V of 0 in E such that A cannot be covered by a finite number of translates of V.
In other words, if are points of A, then and so there exists a point of A such that for . Then, by induction on the integer , we can construct an infinite sequence of points of A such that whenever ; since V is symmetric, we also have for and the sets are disjoint. For every point in E, there exists at most one integer such that , hence the sequence does not have any limit point. This proves a).
Now suppose that A is precompact in E and is contained in a compact subset B of . Then B is complete in , hence also in E (IV, p. 5, Remark 2). We have , hence A is relatively compact in E. The converse is evident and b) follows.
2. Simple compactness of sets of continuous functions
In this section, X denotes a compact space and the space of continuous functions on X, with values in the field K (equal to or ). The space is assigned the topology of simple convergence on X.
Proposition 2
Let D be a dense subset of X and A a subset of the space . The following conditions are equivalent :* (i) A is relatively compact in . (ii) From every infinite sequence of elements of A, we can extract a sequence converging in . (iii) Every infinite sequence of elements of A has a limit point in . (iv) *Let be a sequence of functions belonging to A and a sequence of points of D. If the iterated limits
exist, then they are equal. In addition, we have for all .
(i) (ii) : let be the closure of A in . Assume that A is compact, and consider a sequence of functions (for ). Let be the continuous mapping from X into the metrizable space . The image of X under is a compact metrizable space, since X is compact. Let E be the closed subspace of consisting of continuous functions on X such that the relation implies for every pair of points in X. By cor. 2 of GT, I, § 9, No. 4 and prop. 3 of GT, I, § 5, No. 2, the mapping is a homeomorphism from onto E. Hence the set is compact in , and it is clear that there exist elements in such that is equal to .
Since is a compact metrizable space, there exists a countable dense subset D' in (GT, IX, § 2, No. 8, prop. 12 and § 2, No. 9, prop. 16). Let (resp. ) be the topology on induced by the topology of simple convergence on D' (resp. ). Then is metrizable, is compact and finer than , hence and coincide; in other words, is a compact metrizable subspace of . Therefore, there exists a sequence extracted from and converging to an element of . Therefore, the sequence converges to in .
(ii) (iii) : this is clear.
(iii) (iv) : suppose that every infinite sequence of elements of A has a limit point in . Let . The mapping from A into K is continuous. Consequently, every infinite sequence in has a limit point; since the field K (equal to or ) is metrizable, the set is relatively compact in K, hence bounded. In other words, we have .
Let and be as in (iv). Let be a limit point of the sequence in , and let be a limit point of the sequence in the compact space X. For every , the mapping from into K is continuous. In view of the hypotheses, we have , and hence ; since is continuous and is a limit point of the sequence , we get . In an analogous way, we prove the equality , whence .
(iv) (i) : suppose that the set of numbers , as ranges over A, is bounded in K for all . This is equivalent to assuming that the closure of A in the product space is compact (GT, I, § 9, No. 5). Suppose that A is not relatively compact in . This means that there exists a function and a point such that is not continuous at . Hence there exists a real number such that in every neighbourhood U of , there exists a point with .
We shall construct by induction a sequence of points in D and a sequence of elements of A, satisfying the following relations :
(1)
(2)
(3)
We take with arbitrary in A (the set A is not empty, otherwise it will be relatively compact in ). Let and satisfy relations (1), (2) for and (3) for . Since belongs to , there exists satisfying (2). Let be the set of all such that for . Since is continuous, is a neighbourhood of ; choose a point in such that , hence (1) and (3) are satisfied. Therefore, the construction can be continued.
Since is a compact subset of K, there exists a sequence extracted from and such that the limit exists. By (2), we have for all , hence
(4)
On the other hand we have by (3) hence . Since , we deduce from (2) that . Consequently,
Finally, from (1), we get , and so . This contradicts assertion (iv); we have thus proved that (iv) implies (i).
3. The Eberlein and Šmulian theorems
Theorem 1 (Eberlein)
— *Let E be a Hausdorff and quasi-complete locally convex space, a topology on E which is compatible with the duality between E and E' and A a subset of E. For A to be relatively compact for , it is necessary and sufficient that every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in E for .
The condition stated is obviously necessary.
Suppose now that every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point for , hence also for the coarser topology . Then A is precompact for (IV, p. 32, prop. 1); in order that A be relatively compact for , it is necessary and sufficient that it be so for (loc. cit.). Therefore it is enough to prove the theorem when is the weakened topology .
Let denote the completion of E, which we shall identify as usual with a subspace of the algebraic dual of E' (III, p. 21, th. 2). Let , and denote the spaces E, and endowed with the topologies , and respectively.
Let be a basis of the vector space E' over the field K. The mapping is a homeomorphism from onto ; for every , the image of A under the mapping from E into K is relatively compact : for, K is metrizable and every infinite sequence of elements of has a limit point. It follows that is relatively compact in , hence that the closure of A in is compact.
Next we shall prove that is contained in . Let H be an equicontinuous subset of E'; let X be its closure for ; X is compact (III, p. 17, cor. 2). For every , let be the restriction of to X; let be the set of functions as x ranges over A. In view of the hypothesis on A, every infinite sequence of elements of has a limit point in ; by prop. 2 (IV, p. 33), the set is therefore relatively compact in . It follows that for every , the function on X is continuous. The inclusion then follows from th. 2 of III, p. 21.
Now we shall show that is contained in E. Since A is precompact in (IV, p. 32, prop. 1), it is bounded in (III, p. 3, prop. 2), hence also in E (IV, p. 1, prop. 1). Let C be the closed convex balanced envelope of A in E. Then C is bounded since A is bounded, hence complete since E is quasi-complete. In other words, C is a convex and closed subset of , so also of (IV, p. 1, prop. 1). Since and the topology of is induced by that of , we have , and hence .
Since the topology of is induced by that of , the subset of is compact, and th. 1 follows.
Theorem 2 (Šmulian). — Let E be a Fréchet space and A a subset of E. Let denote the space E endowed with the weakened topology. The following conditions are equivalent :
(i) A is relatively compact in ; (ii) every infinite sequence of points of A has a limit point in ; (iii) from every infinite sequence of points of A, we can extract a sequence which converges in .
The equivalence of (i) and (ii) follows from Eberlein’s theorem and (iii) obviously implies (ii).
We shall prove that (i) implies (iii). Suppose that the closure B of A in is compact and that is a sequence of points of A. Let F denote the smallest closed vector subspace of E containing the , this is a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability. Since F is closed in and the topology on F is induced by , the set is compact for . On account of the remarks in IV, p. 32, the existence of a sequence extracted from converging for (or, which is the same, for ) is a consequence of the following lemma :
Lemma 1
— *Let F be a Fréchet space satisfying the first axiom of countability. Every subset C of F which is compact for the topology induced by is metrizable for this topology.
Since the topology of precompact convergence on is finer than the topology , there exists an everywhere dense countable subset in (III, p. 18, cor. 1). Hence the set C can be identified with a subset of , and the topology induced on C by that of , which is metrizable (GT, IX, § 2, No. 8) is coarser than the topology induced by , for which C is compact. Hence these two topologies are identical (GT, I, § 9, No. 4, cor. 3).
Šmulian’s theorem can be extended to the case where E is the strict inductive limit of a sequence of Fréchet spaces (IV, p. 67, exerc. 2).
\*4. The case of spaces of bounded continuous functions*
For every topological space X, let denote the Banach space of all continuous and bounded mappings from X into K, with the norm defined by
(GT, X, § 3, No. 2). When X is compact, every continuous function on X is bounded (GT, IV, § 6, No. 1), and we write for .
In this and the following section, we shall use the following lemma, which is a particular case of Lebesgue’s theorem (INT, IV, 2nd ed. § 4, No. 3, th. 2) on account of the interpretation of the elements of as measures on X.
Lemma 2
Let X be a compact space. If a sequence is bounded in and converges simply on X to a continuous function f, then for every in .
Proposition 3
Let X be a compact space, and let A be a bounded subset of . For A to be relatively compact for the topology of simple convergence, it is necessary and sufficient that it is relatively compact for .
The topology of simple convergence is Hausdorff and coarser than , hence the condition stated is sufficient (GT, I, § 9, No. 4, cor. 3).
Now suppose that A is relatively compact for the topology of simple convergence. Let be a sequence of elements of A. By prop. 2 (IV, p. 33), there exists a sequence extracted from and converging simply to a continuous function f. By lemma 2, the bounded sequence tends to f for . Then Šmulian’s theorem (IV, p. 36, th. 2) shows that A is relatively compact for .
Corollary
Let S be a topological space and A a bounded subset of . The following conditions are equivalent : (i) A is relatively compact for ; (ii) if is a sequence of elements of A and is a sequence of points of S such that the iterated limits
Let X be the Stone-Čech compactification of S (GT, IX, § 1, No. 6) and the canonical mapping from S into X. Put D = . The mapping is an isomorphism from the normed space onto the normed space ; put . Since X is compact and D is dense in X, the prop. 2 (IV, p. 33) shows that condition (ii) is equivalent to the compactness of for the topology of simple convergence. The equivalence of (i) and (ii) then follows from prop. 3. \*
\*5. Convex envelope of a weakly compact set
Theorem 3 (Krein)
Let E be a Hausdorff and quasi-complete locally convex space, and let be a topology on E compatible with the duality between E and E'. Let A be a subset of E which is compact for . Then the closed convex balanced envelope C of A is compact for .
We shall first make several reductions. A) The set C is precompact for (II, p. 25, prop. 3), and A is compact for . On account of prop. 1 (IV, p. 32), it is enough to prove that C is compact for , and so we have reduced to the case where . B) Since C is precompact and closed for , it is bounded and closed for the initial topology of E (III, p. 3, prop. 2 and IV, p. 1, prop. 1); hence it is complete since E is quasi-complete. In other words, C is the closed convex balanced envelope of in the completion of . Since the topology induces on , we have reduced to the case when is complete.
C) Let be the convex balanced envelope of . Then is the closure of for . By Eberlein’s theorem (IV, p. 35, th. 1), it is enough to prove that every sequence of points of has a limit point for in . But belongs to the convex balanced envelope of a finite subset of . Let be the closed vector subspace of generated by the countable set . Then is complete, the topology on is induced by and we have for all . Hence it is enough to prove that has a limit point for , which gives the reduction to the case when there exists a countable dense set in .
Let be assigned the topology induced by , which makes it a compact space. We define a linear mapping by
Let be an equicontinuous sequence in , converging to 0 for . Then the sequence of functions is bounded in and converges simply to 0. For every , we have by lemma 2 (IV, p. 37). By the criterion given in the remark in III, p. 21, the linear form on is then continuous for for every . Hence there exists a linear mapping satisfying the relation
It is clear that is continuous if is assigned the topology and the topology .
The unit ball (closed) of the Banach space is compact for the topology (III, p. 17, cor. 3). Consequently, is a convex balanced and compact subset of for . For every , the continuous linear form on belongs to , and we have by formulas (7) and (8). Hence, , and so . This proves that is compact for .
Q.E.D.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 5.