Bourbaki

§ 1. First derivative

As was said in the Introduction, in this chapter and the next we shall study the infinitesimal properties of functions which are defined on a subset of the real field R\mathbf{R} and take their values in a Hausdorff topological vector space E over the field R\mathbf{R}; for brevity we shall say that such a function is a vector function of a real variable. The most important case is that where E=RE = \mathbf{R} (real-valued functions of a real variable). When E=RnE = \mathbf{R}^n, consideration of a vector function with values in E reduces to the simultaneous consideration of nn finite real functions.

Many of the definitions and properties stated in chapter I extend to functions which are defined on a subset of the field C\mathbf{C} of complex numbers and take their values in a topological vector space over C\mathbf{C} (vector functions of a complex variable). Some of these definitions and properties extend even to functions which are defined on a subset of an arbitrary commutative topological field K and take their values in a topological vector space over K.

We shall indicate these generalizations in passing (see in particular I, p. 10, Remark 2), emphasising above all the case of functions of a complex variable, which are by far the most important, together with functions of a real variable, and will be studied in greater depth in a later Book.

1. Derivative of a vector function

Definition 1

Let ff be a vector function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R} which does not reduce to a single point. We say that ff is differentiable at a point x0∈Ix_0 \in I if*

lim⁡x→x0,x∈I,x≠x0f(x)−f(x0)x−x0 \lim_{x \to x_0, x \in I, x \neq x_0} \frac{f(x) - f(x_0)}{x - x_0}
*exists (in the vector space where ff takes its values); the value of this limit is called the first derivative (or simply the derivative) of ff at the point x0x_0, and it is denoted by f′(x0)f'(x_0) or Df(x0)Df(x_0).

If ff is differentiable at the point x0x_0, so is the restriction of ff to any interval J⊂IJ \subset I which does not reduce to a single point and such that x0∈Jx_0 \in J; and the derivative of this restriction is equal to f′(x0)f'(x_0). Conversely, let JJ be an interval contained in II and containing a neighbourhood of x0x_0 relative to II; if the restriction of ff to JJ admits a derivative at the point x0x_0, then so does ff.

We summarise these properties by saying that the concept of derivative is a local concept.

Remark 1

In Kinematics, if the point f(t)\mathbf{f}(t) is the position of a moving point in the space R3\mathbf{R}^3 at time tt, then f(t)−f(t0)t−t0\frac{\mathbf{f}(t) - \mathbf{f}(t_0)}{t - t_0} is termed the average velocity between the instants t0t_0 and tt, and its limit f′(t0)\mathbf{f}'(t_0) is the instantaneous velocity (or simply velocity) at the time t0t_0 (when this limit exists).

Remark 2

If a function f\mathbf{f}, defined on II, is differentiable at a point x0∈Ix_0 \in I, it is necessarily continuous relative to II at this point.

Definition 2

Let f\mathbf{f} be a vector function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, and let x0x_0 be a point of II such that the interval I∩[x0,+∞[I \cap [x_0, +\infty[ (resp. I∩]−∞,x0]I \cap ]-\infty, x_0]) does not reduce to a single point. We say that f\mathbf{f} is differentiable on the right (resp. on the left) at the point x0x_0 if the restriction of f\mathbf{f} to the interval I∩[x0,+∞[I \cap [x_0, +\infty[ (resp. I∩]−∞,x0]I \cap ]-\infty, x_0]) is differentiable at the point x0x_0; the value of the derivative of this restriction at the point x0x_0 is called the right (resp. left) derivative of f\mathbf{f} at the point x0x_0 and is denoted by fd′(x0)\mathbf{f}'_d(x_0) (resp. fg′(x0)\mathbf{f}'_g(x_0)).

Let f\mathbf{f} be a vector function defined on II, and x0x_0 an interior point of II such that f\mathbf{f} is continuous at this point; it follows from defs. 1 and 2 that for f\mathbf{f} to be differentiable at x0x_0 it is necessary and sufficient that f\mathbf{f} admit both a right and a left derivative at this point, and that these derivatives be equal; and then

f′(x0)=fd′(x0)=fg′(x0). \mathbf{f}'(x_0) = \mathbf{f}'_d(x_0) = \mathbf{f}'_g(x_0).

Example 1

A constant function has zero derivative at every point.

Example 2

An affine linear function x↦ax+bx \mapsto ax + b has derivative equal to aa at every point.

Example 3

The real function 1/x1/x (defined for x≠0x \neq 0) is differentiable at each point x0≠0x_0 \neq 0, for we have (1x−1x0)/(x−x0)=−1xx0\left( \frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x_0} \right) / (x - x_0) = -\frac{1}{x x_0}, and, since 1/x1/x is continuous at x0x_0, the limit of the preceding expression is −1/x02-1/x_0^2.

Example 4

The scalar function ∣x∣|x|, defined on R\mathbf{R}, has right derivative +1+1 and left derivative −1-1 at x=0x = 0; it is not differentiable at this point.

Example 5

The real function equal to 0 for x=0x = 0, and to xsin⁡1/xx \sin 1/x for x≠0x \neq 0, is defined and continuous on R\mathbf{R}, but has neither right nor left derivative at the point x≠0x \neq 0.* One can give examples of functions which are continuous on an interval and fail to have a derivative at every point of the interval (I, p. 35, exerc. 2 and 3).

Definition 3

We say that a vector function f\mathbf{f} defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R} is differentiable (resp. right differentiable, left differentiable) on II if it is differentiable (resp. right differentiable, left differentiable) at each point of II; the function x↦f′(x)x \mapsto \mathbf{f}'(x) (resp. x↦fd′(x)x \mapsto \mathbf{f}'_d(x), x↦fg′(x)x \mapsto \mathbf{f}'_g(x)) defined on II, is called the derived function, or (by abuse of language) the derivative (resp. right derivative, left derivative) of f\mathbf{f}, and is denoted by f′\mathbf{f}' or Df\mathrm{Df} or df/dxd\mathbf{f}/dx (resp. fd′,fg′\mathbf{f}'_d, \mathbf{f}'_g).

Remark

A function may be differentiable on an interval without its derivative being continuous at every point of the interval (cf. I, p. 36, exerc. 5); *this is shown by the example of the function equal to 0 for x=0x = 0 and to x2sin⁡1/xx^2 \sin 1/x for x≠0x \neq 0; it has a derivative everywhere, but this derivative is discontinuous at the point x=0x = 0.

2. Linearity of differentiation

Proposition 1

The set of vector functions defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, taking values in a given topological vector space EE, and differentiable at the point x0x_0, is a vector space over R\mathbf{R}, and the map f↦Df(x0)f \mapsto Df(x_0) is a linear mapping of this space into EE.

In other words, if ff and gg are defined on II and differentiable at the point x0x_0, then f+gf + g and fafa (aa an arbitrary scalar) are differentiable at x0x_0 and their derivatives there are f′(x0)+g′(x0)f'(x_0) + g'(x_0) and f′(x0)af'(x_0)a respectively. This follows immediately from the continuity of x+yx + y and of xaxa on E×EE \times E and EE respectively.

Corollary

The set of vector functions defined on an interval II, taking values in a given topological vector space EE, and differentiable on II, is a vector space over R\mathbf{R}, and the map f↦Dff \mapsto Df is a linear mapping of this space into the vector space of mappings from II into EE.

Remark

If one endows the vector space of mappings from II into EE and its subspace of differentiable mappings (cf. Gen. Top., X, p. 277) with the topology of simple convergence (or the topology of uniform convergence), the linear mapping f↦Dff \mapsto Df is not continuous (in general) for example, the sequence of functions fn(x)=sin⁡n2x/nf_n(x) = \sin n^2 x / n converges uniformly to 0 on R\mathbf{R}, but the sequence of derivatives fn′(x)=ncos⁡n2xf'_n(x) = n \cos n^2 x does not converge even simply to 0.

Proposition 2

Let EE and FF be two topological vector spaces over R\mathbf{R}, and uu a continuous linear map from EE into FF. If ff is a vector function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, taking values in EE, and differentiable at the point x0∈Ix_0 \in I, then the composite function u∘fu \circ f has a derivative equal to u(f′(x0))u(f'(x_0)) at x0x_0.

Indeed, since u(f(x))−u(f(x0))x−x0=u(f(x)−f(x0)x−x0)\frac{u(f(x)) - u(f(x_0))}{x - x_0} = u \left( \frac{f(x) - f(x_0)}{x - x_0} \right), this follows from the continuity of uu.

Corollary

If φ\varphi is a continuous linear form on EE, then the real function φ∘f\varphi \circ f has a derivative equal to φ(f′(x0))\varphi(f'(x_0)) at the point x0x_0.

Example 1

Let f=(fi)1≤i≤nf = (f_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} be a function with values in Rn\mathbf{R}^n, defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}; each real function fif_i is none other than the composite function pri∘f\mathrm{pr}_i \circ f, so is differentiable at the point x0x_0 if ff is, and, if so, f′(x0)=(fi′(x0))1≤i≤nf'(x_0) = (f'_i(x_0))_{1 \leq i \leq n}.

Example 2

In Kinematics, if f(t)f(t) is the position of a moving point MM at time tt, if g(t)g(t) is the position at the same instant of the projection M′M' of MM onto a plane PP (resp. a line DD) with kernel a line (resp. a plane) not parallel to PP (resp. DD), then gg is the composition of the projection uu of R3\mathbf{R}^3 onto PP (resp. DD) and of ff; since uu is a (continuous) linear mapping one sees that the projection of the velocity of a moving point onto a plane (resp. a line) is equal to the velocity of the projection of the moving point onto the plane (resp. line).

Example 3

Let ff be a complex-valued function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, and let aa be an arbitrary complex number; prop. 2 shows that if ff is differentiable at a point x0x_0 then so is afaf, and the derivative of this function at x0x_0 is equal to af′(x0)af'(x_0).

3. Derivative of a product

Let us now consider pp topological vector spaces EiE_i (1≤i≤p1 \leq i \leq p) over R\mathbf{R}, and a continuous multilinear 1^1 map (which we shall denote by

(x1,x2,…,xp)↦[x1.x2…xp]) (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_p) \mapsto [x_1.x_2 \ldots x_p])

of E1×E2×⋯×EpE_1 \times E_2 \times \cdots \times E_p into a topological vector space F over R\mathbf{R}.

PROPOSITION 3 . *For each index ii (1≤i≤p1 \leq i \leq p) let fif_i be a function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, taking values in EiE_i, and differentiable at the point x0∈Ix_0 \in I. Then the function

x↦[f1(x).f2(x)…fp(x)] x \mapsto [f_1(x).f_2(x) \ldots f_p(x)]

defined on II with values in FF has a derivative equal to

∑i=1p[f1(x0)…fi−1(x0).fi′(x0).fi+1(x0)…fp(x0)] \sum_{i=1}^p [f_1(x_0) \ldots f_{i-1}(x_0).f'_i(x_0).f_{i+1}(x_0) \ldots f_p(x_0)]

at x0x_0.

Let us put h(x)=[f1(x).f2(x)…fp(x)]h(x) = [f_1(x).f_2(x) \ldots f_p(x)]; then, by the identity

[b1.b2…bp]−[a1.a2…ap]=∑i=1p[b1…bi−1.(bi−ai).ai+1…ap], [b_1.b_2 \ldots b_p] - [a_1.a_2 \ldots a_p] = \sum_{i=1}^p [b_1 \ldots b_{i-1}.(b_i - a_i).a_{i+1} \ldots a_p],

we can write

h(x)−h(x0)=∑i=1p[f1(x)…fi−1(x).(fi(x)−fi(x0)).fi+1(x0)…fp(x0)]. h(x) - h(x_0) = \sum_{i=1}^p [f_1(x) \ldots f_{i-1}(x).(f_i(x) - f_i(x_0)).f_{i+1}(x_0) \ldots f_p(x_0)].

On multiplying both sides by 1x−x0\frac{1}{x - x_0} and letting xx approach x0x_0 in II, we obtain the expression (1), since both the map

(x1,x2,…,xp)↦[x1.x2…xp] (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_p) \mapsto [x_1.x_2 \ldots x_p]

and addition in F are continuous.

1^1 Recall (Alg., II, p. 265) that a map ff of E1×E2×⋯×EpE_1 \times E_2 \times \cdots \times E_p into F is said to be multilinear if each partial mapping

xi↦f(a1,…,ai−1,xi,ai+1,…,ap) x_i \mapsto f(a_1, \ldots, a_{i-1}, x_i, a_{i+1}, \ldots, a_p)

from EiE_i into F (1≤i≤p1 \leq i \leq p) is a linear map, the aja_j for indices j≠ij \neq i being arbitrary in EjE_j. We note that if the EiE_i are finite dimensional over R\mathbf{R} then every multilinear map of E1×E2×⋯×EpE_1 \times E_2 \times \cdots \times E_p into F is necessarily continuous; this need not be so if some of these spaces are topological vector spaces of infinite dimension.

When some of the functions fif_i are constant, the terms in the expression (1) containing their derivatives fi′(x0)f'_i(x_0) are zero.

Let us consider in detail the particular case p=2p = 2, the most important in applications: if (x,y)↦[x.y](\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}) \mapsto [\mathbf{x}.\mathbf{y}] is a continuous bilinear map of E×FE \times F into GG, (E, F, G being topological vector spaces over R\mathbf{R}), and f\mathbf{f} and g\mathbf{g} are two vector functions, differentiable at x0x_0, with values in E and F respectively, then the vector function x↦[f(x).g(x)]x \mapsto [\mathbf{f}(x).\mathbf{g}(x)] (which we denote by [f.g][\mathbf{f}.\mathbf{g}]) has a derivative equal to [f′(x0).g(x0)]+[f(x0).g′(x0)][\mathbf{f}'(x_0).\mathbf{g}(x_0)] + [\mathbf{f}(x_0).\mathbf{g}'(x_0)] at x0x_0. In particular, if a\mathbf{a} is a constant vector, then [a.f][\mathbf{a}.\mathbf{f}] (resp. [f.a][\mathbf{f}.\mathbf{a}]) has a derivative equal to [a.f′(x0)][\mathbf{a}.\mathbf{f}'(x_0)] (resp. [f′(x0).a][\mathbf{f}'(x_0).\mathbf{a}]) at x0x_0.

If f\mathbf{f} and g\mathbf{g} are both differentiable on I then so is [f.g][\mathbf{f}.\mathbf{g}], and we have

[f.g]′=[f′.g]+[f.g′]. [\mathbf{f}.\mathbf{g}]' = [\mathbf{f}'.\mathbf{g}] + [\mathbf{f}.\mathbf{g}'].

(2)

Example 1

Let ff be a real function, g\mathbf{g} a vector function, both differentiable at a point x0x_0; the function gf\mathbf{g}f has a derivative equal to g′(x0)f(x0)+g(x0)f′(x0)\mathbf{g}'(x_0)f(x_0) + \mathbf{g}(x_0)f'(x_0) at x0x_0. In particular, if a\mathbf{a} is constant, then af\mathbf{a}f has derivative af′(x0)\mathbf{a}f'(x_0). This last remark, in conjunction with example 1 of I, p. 5, proves that if f=(fi)1≤i≤n\mathbf{f} = (f_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is a vector function with values in Rn\mathbf{R}^n, then for f\mathbf{f} to be differentiable at the point x0x_0 it is necessary and sufficient that each of the real functions fif_i (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) be differentiable there: for, if (ei)1≤i≤n(\mathbf{e}_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is the canonical basis of Rn\mathbf{R}^n, we can write f=∑i=1neifi\mathbf{f} = \sum_{i=1}^n \mathbf{e}_i f_i.

Example 2

The real function xnx^n arises from the multilinear function

(x1,x2,…,xn)↦x1x2…xn (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \mapsto x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n

defined on Rn\mathbf{R}^n, by substituting xx for each of the xix_i; so prop. 3 shows that xnx^n is differentiable on R\mathbf{R} and has derivative nxn−1nx^{n-1}. As a result the polynomial function a0xn+a1xn−1+⋯+an−1x+an\mathbf{a}_0 x^n + \mathbf{a}_1 x^{n-1} + \cdots + \mathbf{a}_{n-1} x + \mathbf{a}_n (the ai\mathbf{a}_i being constant vectors) has derivative

na0xn−1+(n−1)a1xn−2+⋯+an−1; n \mathbf{a}_0 x^{n-1} + (n-1) \mathbf{a}_1 x^{n-2} + \cdots + \mathbf{a}_{n-1};

when the ai\mathbf{a}_i are real numbers this function coincides with the derivative of a polynomial function as defined in Algebra (A, IV).

Example 3

The euclidean scalar product (x∣y)(\mathbf{x}| \mathbf{y}) (Gen. Top , VI, p. 40) is a bilinear map (necessarily continuous) of Rn×Rn\mathbf{R}^n \times \mathbf{R}^n into R\mathbf{R}. If f\mathbf{f} and g\mathbf{g} are two vector functions with values in Rn\mathbf{R}^n, and differentiable at the point x0x_0, then the real function x↦(f(x)∣g(x))x \mapsto (\mathbf{f}(x)|\mathbf{g}(x)) has a derivative equal to (f′(x0)∣g(x0))+(f(x0)∣g′(x0))(\mathbf{f}'(x_0)|\mathbf{g}(x_0)) + (\mathbf{f}(x_0)|\mathbf{g}'(x_0)) at the point x0x_0. There is an analogous result for the hermitian scalar product on Cn\mathbf{C}^n, this space being considered as a vector space over R\mathbf{R}.

Let us consider in particular the case where the euclidean norm ∥f(x)∥\| \mathbf{f}(x) \| is constant, so that (f(x)∣f(x))=∥f(x)∥2(\mathbf{f}(x)|\mathbf{f}(x)) = \| \mathbf{f}(x) \|^2 is also constant; on writing that the derivative of (f(x)∣f(x))(\mathbf{f}(x)|\mathbf{f}(x)) vanishes at x0x_0 we obtain (f(x0)∣f′(x0))=0(\mathbf{f}(x_0)|\mathbf{f}'(x_0)) = 0; in other words, f′(x0)\mathbf{f}'(x_0) is orthogonal to f(x0)\mathbf{f}(x_0).

Example 4

If EE is a topological algebra over R\mathbf{R} (cf. Introduction), the product xyxy of two elements of EE is a continuous bilinear function of (x,y)(x, y); if f\mathbf{f} and g\mathbf{g} have their values in EE and are differentiable at the point x0x_0, then the function x↦f(x)g(x)x \mapsto \mathbf{f}(x)\mathbf{g}(x) has a derivative equal to f′(x0)g(x0)+f(x0)g′(x0)\mathbf{f}'(x_0)\mathbf{g}(x_0) + \mathbf{f}(x_0)\mathbf{g}'(x_0) at x0x_0. In particular, if U(x)=(αij(x))U(x) = (\alpha_{ij}(x)) and V(x)=(βij(x))V(x) = (\beta_{ij}(x)) are two square matrices of order nn, differentiable at x0x_0, their product UVUV has a derivative equal to U′(x0)V(x0)+U(x0)V′(x0)U'(x_0)V(x_0) + U(x_0)V'(x_0) at x0x_0 (where U′(x)=(αij′(x))U'(x) = (\alpha'_{ij}(x)) and V′(x)=(βij′(x))V'(x) = (\beta'_{ij}(x))).

Example 5

The determinant det⁡(x1,x2,…,xn)\det(\mathbf{x}_1, \mathbf{x}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{x}_n) of nn vectors xi=(xij)1≤i≤n\mathbf{x}_i = (x_{ij})_{1 \leq i \leq n} from the space Rn\mathbf{R}^n (Alg., III, p. 522) being a (continuous) multilinear function of the xi\mathbf{x}_i, one sees that if the n2n^2 real functions fijf_{ij} are differentiable at x0x_0, then their determinant g(x)=det⁡(fij(x))g(x) = \det(f_{ij}(x)) has a derivative equal to

∑i=1n[f1(x0),…,fi−1(x0),fi′(x0),fi+1(x0),…,fn(x0)] \sum_{i=1}^n \left[ \mathbf{f}_1(x_0), \ldots, \mathbf{f}_{i-1}(x_0), \mathbf{f}_i'(x_0), \mathbf{f}_{i+1}(x_0), \ldots, \mathbf{f}_n(x_0) \right]
at x0x_0, where fi(x)=(fij(x))1≤j≤n\mathbf{f}_i(x) = (f_{ij}(x))_{1 \leq j \leq n}; in other words, one obtains the derivative of a determinant of order nn by taking the sum of the nn determinants formed by replacing, for each ii, the terms of the ithi^{th} column by their derivatives.

Remark

If U(x)U(x) is a square matrix which is differentiable and invertible at the point x0x_0, then the derivative of its determinant Δ(x)=det⁡(U(x))\Delta(x) = \det(U(x)) can be expressed through the derivative of U(x)U(x) by the formula

Δ′(x0)=Δ(x0)⋅Tr⁡(U′(x0)U−1(x0)). \Delta'(x_0) = \Delta(x_0) \cdot \operatorname{Tr}(U'(x_0) U^{-1}(x_0)).
Indeed, let us put U(x0+h)=U(x0)+hVU(x_0 + h) = U(x_0) + h V; then, by definition, VV tends to U′(x0)U'(x_0) when hh tends to 0. One can write
Δ(x0+h)=Δ(x0)⋅det⁡(I+hVU−1(x0)). \Delta(x_0 + h) = \Delta(x_0) \cdot \det(I + h V U^{-1}(x_0)).
Now det⁡(I+hX)=1+hTr⁡(X)+∑k=2nλkhk\det(I + h X) = 1 + h \operatorname{Tr}(X) + \sum_{k=2}^n \lambda_k h^k, the λk\lambda_k (k≥2k \geq 2) being polynomials in the elements of the matrix XX; since the elements of VU−1(x0)V U^{-1}(x_0) have a limit when hh tends to 0, we indeed obtain the formula (3).

4. Derivative of the inverse of a function

Proposition 4

Let E be a complete normed algebra with a unit element over R\mathbf{R} and let f\mathbf{f} be a function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, taking values in E, and differentiable at the point x0∈Ix_0 \in I. If y0=f(x0)y_0 = \mathbf{f}(x_0) is invertible 2^2 in E, then the function x↦(f(x))−1x \mapsto (\mathbf{f}(x))^{-1} is defined on a neighbourhood of x0x_0 (relative to I), and has a derivative equal to −(f(x0))−1f′(x0)(f(x0))−1-(\mathbf{f}(x_0))^{-1} \mathbf{f}'(x_0) (\mathbf{f}(x_0))^{-1} at x0x_0.

Indeed, the set of invertible elements in E is an open set on which the function y↦y−1y \mapsto y^{-1} is continuous (Gen. Top., IX, p. 178); since f\mathbf{f} is continuous (relative to I) at x0x_0, (f(x))−1(\mathbf{f}(x))^{-1} is defined on a neighbourhood of x0x_0, and we have

(f(x))−1−(f(x0))−1=(f(x))−1(f(x0)−f(x))(f(x0))−1. (\mathbf{f}(x))^{-1} - (\mathbf{f}(x_0))^{-1} = (\mathbf{f}(x))^{-1} \left( \mathbf{f}(x_0) - \mathbf{f}(x) \right) (\mathbf{f}(x_0))^{-1}.
The proposition thus follows from the continuity of y−1y^{-1} on a neighbourhood of y0y_0 and the continuity of xyxy on E×EE \times E.

2^2 Recall from (Alg., I, p. 15) that an element z∈Ez \in E is said to be invertible if there exists an element of EE, denoted by z−1z^{-1}, such that zz−1=z−1z=ezz^{-1} = z^{-1}z = e (e being the unit element of EE).

Example 1

The most important particular case is that where E is one of the fields R\mathbf{R} or C\mathbf{C}: if ff is a function with real or complex values, differentiable at the point x0x_0, and such that f(x0)≠0f(x_0) \neq 0, then 1/f1/f has derivative equal to −f′(x0)/(f(x0))2-f'(x_0)/(f(x_0))^2 at x0x_0.

Example 2

If U=(αij(x))U = (\alpha_{ij}(x)) is a square matrix of order nn, differentiable at x0x_0 and invertible at this point, then U−1U^{-1} has derivative equal to −U−1U′U−1-U^{-1} U' U^{-1} at x0x_0.

5. Derivative of a composite function

Proposition 5

Let ff be a real function defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, and gg a vector function defined on an interval of R\mathbf{R} containing f(I)f(I). If ff is differentiable at the point x0x_0 and gg is differentiable at the point f(x0)f(x_0) then the composite function g∘fg \circ f has a derivative equal to g′(f(x0))f′(x0)g'(f(x_0)) f'(x_0) at x0x_0.

Let us put h=g∘fh = g \circ f; for x≠x0x \neq x_0 we can write

h(x)−h(x0)x−x0=u(x)f(x)−f(x0)x−x0 \frac{h(x) - h(x_0)}{x - x_0} = u(x) \frac{f(x) - f(x_0)}{x - x_0}
where we set u(x)=g(f(x))−g(f(x0))f(x)−f(x0)u(x) = \frac{g(f(x)) - g(f(x_0))}{f(x) - f(x_0)} if f(x)≠f(x0)f(x) \neq f(x_0), and u(x)=g′(f(x0))u(x) = g'(f(x_0)) otherwise. Now f(x)f(x) has limit f(x0)f(x_0) when xx tends to x0x_0, so u(x)u(x) has limit g′(f(x0))g'(f(x_0)), from which the proposition follows in view of the continuity of the function yxyx on E×RE \times \mathbf{R}.

6. Derivative of an inverse function

Proposition 6

Let ff be a homeomorphism of an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R} onto an interval J=f(I)⊂RJ = f(I) \subset \mathbf{R}, and let gg be the inverse homeomorphism3^3. If ff is differentiable at the point x0∈Ix_0 \in I, and if f′(x0)≠0f'(x_0) \neq 0, then gg has a derivative equal to 1/f′(x0)1/f'(x_0) at y0=f(x0)y_0 = f(x_0).

For each y∈Jy \in J we have g(y)∈Ig(y) \in I and u=f(g(y))u = f(g(y)); we thus can write

g(y)−g(y0)y−y0=g(y)−x0f(g(y))−f(x0) \frac{g(y) - g(y_0)}{y - y_0} = \frac{g(y) - x_0}{f(g(y)) - f(x_0)}
for y≠y0y \neq y_0. When yy tends to y0y_0 while remaining in JJ and ≠y0\neq y_0, then g(y)g(y) tends to x0x_0 remaining in II and ≠x0\neq x_0, and the right-hand side in the preceding formula thus has limit 1/f′(x0)1/f'(x_0), since by hypothesis f′(x0)≠0f'(x_0) \neq 0.

Corollary

If ff is differentiable on II and if f′(x)≠0f'(x) \neq 0 on II, then gg is differentiable on JJ and its derivative at each point y∈Jy \in J is 1/f′(g(y))1/f'(g(y)).

For example, for each integer n>0n > 0, the function x1/nx^{1/n} is a homeomorphism of R+\mathbf{R}_+ onto itself, is the inverse of xnx^n, and has derivative 1nx1n−1\frac{1}{n} x^{\frac{1}{n} - 1} at each x>0x > 0.

One deduces easily, from prop. 5, that for every rational number r=p/q>0r = p/q > 0 the function xr=(x1/q)px^r = (x^{1/q})^p has derivative rx′−1r{x'}^{-1} at every x>0x > 0.

3^3 For ff to be a homeomorphism of II onto a subset of R\mathbf{R} we know that it is necessary and sufficient that ff be continuous and strictly monotone on II (Gen. Top., IV, p. 338, th. 5).

Remark 1

All the preceding propositions, stated for functions differentiable at a point x0x_0, immediately yield propositions for functions which are right (resp. left) differentiable at x0x_0, when, instead of the functions themselves, one considers their restrictions to the intersection of their intervals of definition with the interval [x0,+∞[[x_0, +\infty[ (resp. ]−∞,x0-\infty, x_0]); we leave it to the reader to state them.

Remark 2

The preceding definitions and propositions (except for those concerning right and left derivatives) extend easily to the case where one replaces R\mathbf{R} by an arbitrary commutative non-discrete topological field KK, and the topological vector spaces (resp. topological algebras) over R\mathbf{R} by topological vector spaces (resp. topological algebras) over KK. In def. 1 and props. 1, 2 and 3 it is enough to replace I by a neighbourhood of x0x_0 in KK; in prop. 4 one must assume further that the map y↦y′y \mapsto y' is defined and continuous on a neighbourhood of f(x0)f(x_0) in E. Prop. 5 generalizes in the following manner: let K′K' be a non-discrete subfield of the topological field KK, let E be a topological vector space over KK; let ff be a function defined on a neighbourhood V⊂K′V \subset K' of x0∈K′x_0 \in K', with values in KK (considered as a topological vector space over K′K'), differentiable at x0x_0, and let g be a function defined on a neighbourhood of f(x0)∈Kf(x_0) \in K, with values in E, and differentiable at the point f(x0)f(x_0); then the map g∘fg \circ f is differentiable at x0x_0 and has derivative g′(f(x0))f′(x0)g'(f(x_0))f'(x_0) there (E being then considered as a topological vector space over K′K').

With the same notation, let ff be a function defined on a neighbourhood V of a∈Ka \in K, with values in E, and differentiable at the point aa; if a∈K′a \in K', then the restriction of ff to V∩K′V \cap K' is differentiable at aa, and has derivative f′(a)f'(a) there. These considerations apply above all, in practice, to the case where K=CK = \mathbf{C} and K′=RK' = \mathbf{R}.

Finally, prop. 6 extends to the case where one replaces I by a neighbourhood of x0∈Kx_0 \in K, and ff by a homeomorphism of I onto a neighbourhood J=f(I)J = f(I) of y0=f(x0)y_0 = f(x_0) in KK.

7. Derivatives of real-valued functions

The preceding definitions and propositions may be augmented in several respects when we deal with real-valued functions of a real variable.

In the first place, if ff is such a function, defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}, and continuous relative to I at a point x0∈Ix_0 \in I, it can happen that when xx tends to x0x_0 while remaining in I and ≠x0\neq x_0, that f(x)−f(x0)x−x0\frac{f(x) - f(x_0)}{x - x_0} has a limit equal to +∞+\infty or to −∞-\infty; one then says that ff is differentiable at x0x_0 and has derivative +∞+\infty (resp. −∞-\infty) there; if the function ff has a derivative f′(x)f'(x) (finite or infinite) at every point xx of I, then the function f′f' (with values in R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}}) is again called the derived function (or simply the derivative) of ff. One generalizes the definitions of right and left derivative similarly.

Example

At the point x=0x = 0 the function x1/3x^{1/3} (the inverse function of x3x^3, a homeomorphism of R\mathbf{R} onto itself) has a derivative, equal to +∞+\infty; at x=0x = 0 the function ∣x∣1/3|x|^{1/3} has right derivative +∞+\infty and left derivative −∞-\infty.

The formulae for the derivative of a sum, of a product of differentiable real functions, and for the inverse of a differentiable function (props. 1, 3 and 4), as well as for the derivative of a (real-valued) composition of functions (prop. 5) remain valid when the derivatives that occur are infinite, so long as all the expressions that occur in these formulae make sense (Gen Top., IV, p. 345–346). In fact, if in prop. 6 one supposes that ff is strictly increasing (resp. strictly decreasing) and continuous on I, and if f′(x0)=0f'(x_0) = 0, then the inverse function gg has a derivative equal to +∞+\infty (resp. −∞-\infty) at the point y0=f(x0)y_0 = f(x_0); if f′(x0)=+∞f'(x_0) = +\infty (resp. −∞-\infty), then gg has derivative 0. There are similar results for right and left derivatives, which we leave to the care of the reader.

Let C be the graph or representing curve of a finite real function ff, the subset of the plane R2\mathbf{R}^2 formed by the points (x,f(x))(x, f(x)) where xx runs through the set where ff is defined. If the function ff has a finite right derivative at a point x0∈Ix_0 \in I, then the half-line with origin at the point Mx0=(x0,f(x0))M_{x_0} = (x_0, f(x_0)) of C, and direction numbers (1,fd′(x0))(1, f'_d(x_0)) is called the right half-tangent to the curve C at the point Mx0M_{x_0}; when fd′(x0)=+∞f'_d(x_0) = +\infty (resp. fd′(x0)=−∞f'_d(x_0) = -\infty) we use the same terminology for the half-line with origin Mx0M_{x_0} and direction numbers (0,1)(0, 1) (resp. (0,−1)(0, -1)). In the same way one defines the left half-tangent at Mx0M_{x_0} when fg′(x0)f'_g(x_0) exists. With these definitions one can verify quickly that the angle which the right (resp. left) half-tangent makes with the abscissa is the limit of the angle made by this axis with the half-line originating at Mx0M_{x_0} and passing through the point M1=(x,f(x))M_1 = (x, f(x)) of C, as xx tends to x0x_0 while remaining >x0> x_0 (resp. <x0< x_0).

One can also say that the right (resp. left) half-tangent is the limit of the half-line originating at Mx0M_{x_0} passing through M1M_1, on endowing the set of half-lines having the same origin with the quotient space topology C∗/R+∗C^*/\mathbf{R}_+^* (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 107).

If the two half-tangents exist at a point Mx0M_{x_0} of C, they are in opposite directions only when ff has a derivative (finite or not) at the point x0x_0 (assumed interior to I); they are identical only when fd′(x0)f'_d(x_0) and fg′(x0)f'_g(x_0) are infinite and of opposite sign. In these two cases we say that the line containing these two half-tangents is the tangent to C at the point Mx0M_{x_0}.

When the tangent at Mx0M_{x_0} exists it is the limit of the line passing through Mx0M_{x_0} and M1M_1 as xx tends to x0x_0 remaining ≠x0\neq x_0, the topology on the set of lines which pass through a given fixed point being that of the quotient space C∗/R∗C^*/\mathbf{R}^* (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 114).

The concepts of tangent and half-tangent to a graph are particular cases of general concepts which will be defined in the part of this Series devoted to differentiable varieties.

Definition 4

We say that a real function ff, defined on a subset A of a topological space E, has a relative maximum (resp. strict relative maximum, relative minimum, strict relative minimum) at a point x0∈Ax_0 \in A, relative to A, if there is a neighbourhood VV of x0x_0 in E such that at every point x∈V∩Ax \in V \cap A distinct from x0x_0 one has f(x)≤f(x0)f(x) \leq f(x_0) (resp. f(x)<f(x0)f(x) < f(x_0), f(x)≥f(x0)f(x) \geq f(x_0), f(x)>f(x0)f(x) > f(x_0)).

It is clear that if ff attains its least upper bound (resp. greatest lower bound) over A at a point of A, then it has a relative maximum (resp. relative minimum) relative to A at this point; the converse is of course incorrect.

Note that if B⊂AB \subset A, and if ff admits (for example) a relative maximum at a point x0∈Bx_0 \in B relative to B, then ff does not necessarily have a relative maximum relative to A at this point.

Proposition 7

Let ff be a finite real function, defined on an interval I⊂RI \subset \mathbf{R}. If ff admits a relative maximum (resp. relative minimum) at a point x0x_0 interior to I, and has both right and left derivatives at this point, then one has fd′(x0)≤0f'_d(x_0) \leq 0 and fg′(x0)≥0f'_g(x_0) \geq 0 (resp. fd′(x0)≥0f'_d(x_0) \geq 0 and fg′(x0)≤0f'_g(x_0) \leq 0); in particular, if ff is differentiable at the point x0x_0, then f′(x0)=0f'(x_0) = 0.

The proposition follows trivially from the definitions.

We can say further that if at a point x0x_0 interior to I the function ff is differentiable and admits a relative maximum or minimum, then the tangent to its graph is parallel to the abscissa. The converse is incorrect, as is shown by the example of the function x3x^3 which has zero derivative at the point x=0x = 0, but has neither relative maximum nor minimum at this point.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 1.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.