§ 1. First derivative
As was said in the Introduction, in this chapter and the next we shall study the infinitesimal properties of functions which are defined on a subset of the real field and take their values in a Hausdorff topological vector space E over the field ; for brevity we shall say that such a function is a vector function of a real variable. The most important case is that where (real-valued functions of a real variable). When , consideration of a vector function with values in E reduces to the simultaneous consideration of finite real functions.
Many of the definitions and properties stated in chapter I extend to functions which are defined on a subset of the field of complex numbers and take their values in a topological vector space over (vector functions of a complex variable). Some of these definitions and properties extend even to functions which are defined on a subset of an arbitrary commutative topological field K and take their values in a topological vector space over K.
We shall indicate these generalizations in passing (see in particular I, p. 10, Remark 2), emphasising above all the case of functions of a complex variable, which are by far the most important, together with functions of a real variable, and will be studied in greater depth in a later Book.
1. Derivative of a vector function
Definition 1
Let be a vector function defined on an interval which does not reduce to a single point. We say that is differentiable at a point if*
If is differentiable at the point , so is the restriction of to any interval which does not reduce to a single point and such that ; and the derivative of this restriction is equal to . Conversely, let be an interval contained in and containing a neighbourhood of relative to ; if the restriction of to admits a derivative at the point , then so does .
We summarise these properties by saying that the concept of derivative is a local concept.
Remark 1
In Kinematics, if the point is the position of a moving point in the space at time , then is termed the average velocity between the instants and , and its limit is the instantaneous velocity (or simply velocity) at the time (when this limit exists).
Remark 2
If a function , defined on , is differentiable at a point , it is necessarily continuous relative to at this point.
Definition 2
Let be a vector function defined on an interval , and let be a point of such that the interval (resp. ) does not reduce to a single point. We say that is differentiable on the right (resp. on the left) at the point if the restriction of to the interval (resp. ) is differentiable at the point ; the value of the derivative of this restriction at the point is called the right (resp. left) derivative of at the point and is denoted by (resp. ).
Let be a vector function defined on , and an interior point of such that is continuous at this point; it follows from defs. 1 and 2 that for to be differentiable at it is necessary and sufficient that admit both a right and a left derivative at this point, and that these derivatives be equal; and then
Example 1
A constant function has zero derivative at every point.
Example 2
An affine linear function has derivative equal to at every point.
Example 3
The real function (defined for ) is differentiable at each point , for we have , and, since is continuous at , the limit of the preceding expression is .
Example 4
The scalar function , defined on , has right derivative and left derivative at ; it is not differentiable at this point.
Example 5
The real function equal to 0 for , and to for , is defined and continuous on , but has neither right nor left derivative at the point .* One can give examples of functions which are continuous on an interval and fail to have a derivative at every point of the interval (I, p. 35, exerc. 2 and 3).
Definition 3
We say that a vector function defined on an interval is differentiable (resp. right differentiable, left differentiable) on if it is differentiable (resp. right differentiable, left differentiable) at each point of ; the function (resp. , ) defined on , is called the derived function, or (by abuse of language) the derivative (resp. right derivative, left derivative) of , and is denoted by or or (resp. ).
Remark
A function may be differentiable on an interval without its derivative being continuous at every point of the interval (cf. I, p. 36, exerc. 5); *this is shown by the example of the function equal to 0 for and to for ; it has a derivative everywhere, but this derivative is discontinuous at the point .
2. Linearity of differentiation
Proposition 1
The set of vector functions defined on an interval , taking values in a given topological vector space , and differentiable at the point , is a vector space over , and the map is a linear mapping of this space into .
In other words, if and are defined on and differentiable at the point , then and ( an arbitrary scalar) are differentiable at and their derivatives there are and respectively. This follows immediately from the continuity of and of on and respectively.
Corollary
The set of vector functions defined on an interval , taking values in a given topological vector space , and differentiable on , is a vector space over , and the map is a linear mapping of this space into the vector space of mappings from into .
Remark
If one endows the vector space of mappings from into and its subspace of differentiable mappings (cf. Gen. Top., X, p. 277) with the topology of simple convergence (or the topology of uniform convergence), the linear mapping is not continuous (in general) for example, the sequence of functions converges uniformly to 0 on , but the sequence of derivatives does not converge even simply to 0.
Proposition 2
Let and be two topological vector spaces over , and a continuous linear map from into . If is a vector function defined on an interval , taking values in , and differentiable at the point , then the composite function has a derivative equal to at .
Indeed, since , this follows from the continuity of .
Corollary
If is a continuous linear form on , then the real function has a derivative equal to at the point .
Example 1
Let be a function with values in , defined on an interval ; each real function is none other than the composite function , so is differentiable at the point if is, and, if so, .
Example 2
In Kinematics, if is the position of a moving point at time , if is the position at the same instant of the projection of onto a plane (resp. a line ) with kernel a line (resp. a plane) not parallel to (resp. ), then is the composition of the projection of onto (resp. ) and of ; since is a (continuous) linear mapping one sees that the projection of the velocity of a moving point onto a plane (resp. a line) is equal to the velocity of the projection of the moving point onto the plane (resp. line).
Example 3
Let be a complex-valued function defined on an interval , and let be an arbitrary complex number; prop. 2 shows that if is differentiable at a point then so is , and the derivative of this function at is equal to .
3. Derivative of a product
Let us now consider topological vector spaces () over , and a continuous multilinear map (which we shall denote by
of into a topological vector space F over .
PROPOSITION 3 . *For each index () let be a function defined on an interval , taking values in , and differentiable at the point . Then the function
defined on with values in has a derivative equal to
at .
Let us put ; then, by the identity
we can write
On multiplying both sides by and letting approach in , we obtain the expression (1), since both the map
and addition in F are continuous.
Recall (Alg., II, p. 265) that a map of into F is said to be multilinear if each partial mapping
from into F () is a linear map, the for indices being arbitrary in . We note that if the are finite dimensional over then every multilinear map of into F is necessarily continuous; this need not be so if some of these spaces are topological vector spaces of infinite dimension.
When some of the functions are constant, the terms in the expression (1) containing their derivatives are zero.
Let us consider in detail the particular case , the most important in applications: if is a continuous bilinear map of into , (E, F, G being topological vector spaces over ), and and are two vector functions, differentiable at , with values in E and F respectively, then the vector function (which we denote by ) has a derivative equal to at . In particular, if is a constant vector, then (resp. ) has a derivative equal to (resp. ) at .
If and are both differentiable on I then so is , and we have
(2)
Example 1
Let be a real function, a vector function, both differentiable at a point ; the function has a derivative equal to at . In particular, if is constant, then has derivative . This last remark, in conjunction with example 1 of I, p. 5, proves that if is a vector function with values in , then for to be differentiable at the point it is necessary and sufficient that each of the real functions () be differentiable there: for, if is the canonical basis of , we can write .
Example 2
The real function arises from the multilinear function
defined on , by substituting for each of the ; so prop. 3 shows that is differentiable on and has derivative . As a result the polynomial function (the being constant vectors) has derivative
when the are real numbers this function coincides with the derivative of a polynomial function as defined in Algebra (A, IV).
Example 3
The euclidean scalar product (Gen. Top , VI, p. 40) is a bilinear map (necessarily continuous) of into . If and are two vector functions with values in , and differentiable at the point , then the real function has a derivative equal to at the point . There is an analogous result for the hermitian scalar product on , this space being considered as a vector space over .
Let us consider in particular the case where the euclidean norm is constant, so that is also constant; on writing that the derivative of vanishes at we obtain ; in other words, is orthogonal to .
Example 4
If is a topological algebra over (cf. Introduction), the product of two elements of is a continuous bilinear function of ; if and have their values in and are differentiable at the point , then the function has a derivative equal to at . In particular, if and are two square matrices of order , differentiable at , their product has a derivative equal to at (where and ).
Example 5
The determinant of vectors from the space (Alg., III, p. 522) being a (continuous) multilinear function of the , one sees that if the real functions are differentiable at , then their determinant has a derivative equal to
Remark
If is a square matrix which is differentiable and invertible at the point , then the derivative of its determinant can be expressed through the derivative of by the formula
4. Derivative of the inverse of a function
Proposition 4
Let E be a complete normed algebra with a unit element over and let be a function defined on an interval , taking values in E, and differentiable at the point . If is invertible in E, then the function is defined on a neighbourhood of (relative to I), and has a derivative equal to at .
Indeed, the set of invertible elements in E is an open set on which the function is continuous (Gen. Top., IX, p. 178); since is continuous (relative to I) at , is defined on a neighbourhood of , and we have
Recall from (Alg., I, p. 15) that an element is said to be invertible if there exists an element of , denoted by , such that (e being the unit element of ).
Example 1
The most important particular case is that where E is one of the fields or : if is a function with real or complex values, differentiable at the point , and such that , then has derivative equal to at .
Example 2
If is a square matrix of order , differentiable at and invertible at this point, then has derivative equal to at .
5. Derivative of a composite function
Proposition 5
Let be a real function defined on an interval , and a vector function defined on an interval of containing . If is differentiable at the point and is differentiable at the point then the composite function has a derivative equal to at .
Let us put ; for we can write
6. Derivative of an inverse function
Proposition 6
Let be a homeomorphism of an interval onto an interval , and let be the inverse homeomorphism. If is differentiable at the point , and if , then has a derivative equal to at .
For each we have and ; we thus can write
Corollary
If is differentiable on and if on , then is differentiable on and its derivative at each point is .
For example, for each integer , the function is a homeomorphism of onto itself, is the inverse of , and has derivative at each .
One deduces easily, from prop. 5, that for every rational number the function has derivative at every .
For to be a homeomorphism of onto a subset of we know that it is necessary and sufficient that be continuous and strictly monotone on (Gen. Top., IV, p. 338, th. 5).
Remark 1
All the preceding propositions, stated for functions differentiable at a point , immediately yield propositions for functions which are right (resp. left) differentiable at , when, instead of the functions themselves, one considers their restrictions to the intersection of their intervals of definition with the interval (resp. ]]); we leave it to the reader to state them.
Remark 2
The preceding definitions and propositions (except for those concerning right and left derivatives) extend easily to the case where one replaces by an arbitrary commutative non-discrete topological field , and the topological vector spaces (resp. topological algebras) over by topological vector spaces (resp. topological algebras) over . In def. 1 and props. 1, 2 and 3 it is enough to replace I by a neighbourhood of in ; in prop. 4 one must assume further that the map is defined and continuous on a neighbourhood of in E. Prop. 5 generalizes in the following manner: let be a non-discrete subfield of the topological field , let E be a topological vector space over ; let be a function defined on a neighbourhood of , with values in (considered as a topological vector space over ), differentiable at , and let g be a function defined on a neighbourhood of , with values in E, and differentiable at the point ; then the map is differentiable at and has derivative there (E being then considered as a topological vector space over ).
With the same notation, let be a function defined on a neighbourhood V of , with values in E, and differentiable at the point ; if , then the restriction of to is differentiable at , and has derivative there. These considerations apply above all, in practice, to the case where and .
Finally, prop. 6 extends to the case where one replaces I by a neighbourhood of , and by a homeomorphism of I onto a neighbourhood of in .
7. Derivatives of real-valued functions
The preceding definitions and propositions may be augmented in several respects when we deal with real-valued functions of a real variable.
In the first place, if is such a function, defined on an interval , and continuous relative to I at a point , it can happen that when tends to while remaining in I and , that has a limit equal to or to ; one then says that is differentiable at and has derivative (resp. ) there; if the function has a derivative (finite or infinite) at every point of I, then the function (with values in ) is again called the derived function (or simply the derivative) of . One generalizes the definitions of right and left derivative similarly.
Example
At the point the function (the inverse function of , a homeomorphism of onto itself) has a derivative, equal to ; at the function has right derivative and left derivative .
The formulae for the derivative of a sum, of a product of differentiable real functions, and for the inverse of a differentiable function (props. 1, 3 and 4), as well as for the derivative of a (real-valued) composition of functions (prop. 5) remain valid when the derivatives that occur are infinite, so long as all the expressions that occur in these formulae make sense (Gen Top., IV, p. 345–346). In fact, if in prop. 6 one supposes that is strictly increasing (resp. strictly decreasing) and continuous on I, and if , then the inverse function has a derivative equal to (resp. ) at the point ; if (resp. ), then has derivative 0. There are similar results for right and left derivatives, which we leave to the care of the reader.
Let C be the graph or representing curve of a finite real function , the subset of the plane formed by the points where runs through the set where is defined. If the function has a finite right derivative at a point , then the half-line with origin at the point of C, and direction numbers is called the right half-tangent to the curve C at the point ; when (resp. ) we use the same terminology for the half-line with origin and direction numbers (resp. ). In the same way one defines the left half-tangent at when exists. With these definitions one can verify quickly that the angle which the right (resp. left) half-tangent makes with the abscissa is the limit of the angle made by this axis with the half-line originating at and passing through the point of C, as tends to while remaining (resp. ).
One can also say that the right (resp. left) half-tangent is the limit of the half-line originating at passing through , on endowing the set of half-lines having the same origin with the quotient space topology (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 107).
If the two half-tangents exist at a point of C, they are in opposite directions only when has a derivative (finite or not) at the point (assumed interior to I); they are identical only when and are infinite and of opposite sign. In these two cases we say that the line containing these two half-tangents is the tangent to C at the point .
When the tangent at exists it is the limit of the line passing through and as tends to remaining , the topology on the set of lines which pass through a given fixed point being that of the quotient space (Gen. Top., VIII, p. 114).
The concepts of tangent and half-tangent to a graph are particular cases of general concepts which will be defined in the part of this Series devoted to differentiable varieties.
Definition 4
We say that a real function , defined on a subset A of a topological space E, has a relative maximum (resp. strict relative maximum, relative minimum, strict relative minimum) at a point , relative to A, if there is a neighbourhood of in E such that at every point distinct from one has (resp. , , ).
It is clear that if attains its least upper bound (resp. greatest lower bound) over A at a point of A, then it has a relative maximum (resp. relative minimum) relative to A at this point; the converse is of course incorrect.
Note that if , and if admits (for example) a relative maximum at a point relative to B, then does not necessarily have a relative maximum relative to A at this point.
Proposition 7
Let be a finite real function, defined on an interval . If admits a relative maximum (resp. relative minimum) at a point interior to I, and has both right and left derivatives at this point, then one has and (resp. and ); in particular, if is differentiable at the point , then .
The proposition follows trivially from the definitions.
We can say further that if at a point interior to I the function is differentiable and admits a relative maximum or minimum, then the tangent to its graph is parallel to the abscissa. The converse is incorrect, as is shown by the example of the function which has zero derivative at the point , but has neither relative maximum nor minimum at this point.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.