§ 3. Derivatives of higher order
1. Derivatives of order
Let be a vector function of a real variable, defined, continuous and differentiable on an interval . If the derivative exists on a neighbourhood (with respect to ) of a point , and is differentiable at the point , then its derivative is called the second derivative of at the point , and is denoted by or . If this second derivative exists at every point of (which implies that exists and is continuous on ), then is a vector function which one denotes by or . We define, in the same way, recursively, the derivative (or derivative of order ) of , and denote it by or ; by definition, its value at the point is the derivative of the function at the point : this definition presupposes the existence of all the derivatives of order on a neighbourhood of relative to , and the differentiability of at the point .
We will say that is n times differentiable at the point (resp. in an interval) if it admits an derivative at this point (resp. in this interval). One says that is indefinitely differentiable on if for each integer it admits a derivative of order on .
By induction on one sees that
More precisely, when one of the two terms in (1) is defined, then so is the other, and is equal to it.
Proposition 1
The set of vector functions defined on an interval* , taking values in a given topological vector space , and having an derivative on , is a vector space over , and is a linear mapping of this space into the vector space of linear mappings from into .
One proves the formulae
by induction on when and have an derivative on ( being constant).
Proposition 2 ("Leibniz' formula")
Let* be three topological vector spaces over , and a continuous bilinear mapping of into . If (resp. ) is defined on an interval , takes its values in (resp. ) and has an derivative on , then has an derivative on , *given by the formula
Formula (4) is proved by induction on (using the relation for the binomial coefficients).
In the same way one can verify the following formula (where the hypotheses are the same as in prop. 2):
The preceding propositions have been stated for functions that are times differentiable on an interval; we leave it to the reader to formulate the analogous propositions for functions that are times differentiable at a point.
2. Taylor's formula
Let be a vector function defined on an interval , with values in a normed space over ; to say that has a derivative at a point signifies that
or, otherwise, that is "approximately equal" to the linear function on a neighbourhood of (cf. chap. V, where this concept is developed in a general manner). We shall see that the existence of the order derivative of at the point entails in the same way that is "approximately equal" to a polynomial of degree in , with coefficients in (Gen. Top., X, p. 315) on a neighbourhood of . To be precise:
Theorem 1
If the function has an derivative at the point then
We proceed by induction on . The theorem holds for . For arbitrary one can, by the induction hypothesis, apply it to the derivative of : for any there is an such that, if one puts
one has, for and ,
We apply the mean value theorem (I, p. 15, th. 2) on the interval with endpoints (with ) to the vector function and to the real increasing function equal to if , and to if ; it follows that , which proves the theorem.
We thus can write
When has a derivative of order on I, one can estimate in terms of this derivative, on all of I, and not just on an unspecified neighbourhood of :
Proposition 3
If on I, then we have*
Indeed, the formula holds for , by I, p. 15, th. 2. Let us prove it by induction on : by the induction hypothesis applied to , one has
Corollary
If is a finite real function with a derivative of order* on I, and if on I, then for all in I one has
The proof proceeds in the same way, but applying th. 1 of I, p. 14.
Remark 1
We have already noticed in the proof of th. 1 that if has a derivative of order on I, and if
We say that it is obtained from the expansion (11) of by differentiating term-by-term.
Remark 2
With the same hypotheses, the coefficients in (11) are determined recursively by the relations
In the case one concludes, in particular, that if ( an integer > 0) has a derivative of order on a neighbourhood of 0 then the Taylor expansion of order of this function is simply
where is the remainder in the expansion (cf. V, p. 222).
Remark 3
The definition of the derivative of order and the preceding results generalize immediately to functions of a complex variable; we shall not pursue this topic further here; it will be treated in detail in a later Book in this Series.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 3.