With hypotheses as in Exer. 27 a), assume in addition that there exists a μ-integrable G-paving F.
a) For every μ-integrable numerical function f≥0 defined on X, set f(x)=∑s∈Gf(sx), so that ∫Ff(x)dμ(x)=∫Xf(x)dμ(x) (§ 2, No. 10, Prop. 15). Let (fi)1≤i≤n be a family of numerical functions ≥0, μ-integrable on X; for i=j set
mij=∫Ffi(x)fj(x)dμ(x),
and let ci=supx∈Xfi(x). Show that there exists at least one pair of distinct indices (i,j) such that
(5) Cf. TVS II, §5, No. 2, Prop. 3; a closed convex set with nonempty interior was called a convex body (corps convexe) in the first edition of Ch. II of Esp. vect. top. (§ 3, No. 2, Def. 4).
(Bound the sum ∑i=jmij from below, using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality.) From this, deduce that if (Ai)1≤i≤n is a finite family of μ-integrable G-fillings, and if
i=1∑nμ(Ai)>μ(F),
then there exist a pair (i,j) of distinct indices and an s∈G such that μ(Ais∩Aj)>0.
b) If G0 is a subgroup of G of finite index (G:G0)=h, and if (s1,…,sh) is a system of representatives of the right cosets of G0 in G, then F0=⋃1≤i≤hsiF is a G0-paving.
c) In X=Rn, let A be a symmetric closed convex set with nonempty interior; let ui:(xj)↦∑j=1ncijxj be m linear forms on X, with integer coefficients cij (m<n). Show that for every integer p≥1 and every number r≥0 such that μ(A)rn≥2npm, there exists a point x∈rA∩Zn distinct from 0 and such that ui(x)≡0(modp) for 1≤i≤m (apply Minkowski’s theorem (Exer. 27 c)) to the subgroup G0 of Zn formed by the z∈Zn such that ui(z)≡0(modp) for 1≤i≤m, and make use of b)). Special case that n=2,m=1 and A is defined by ∣x1∣≤1,∣x2∣≤1 (Thue’s theorem).