Bourbaki

Exercise 1, § 6

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, I, 102

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let gg be a semi-simple Lie algebra and ρ\rho a finite-dimensional representation of gg on MM.

(a) If ρ\rho is simple and non-zero, Hp(g,M)={0}H^p(g, M) = \{0\} for all pp. (Use Proposition 1 and Exercise 12 (j) of § 3.)

(b) For all ρ\rho, H1(g,M)={0}H^1(g, M) = \{0\}. (If ρ\rho is simple and non-zero, apply (a). If ρ\rho is zero, use the fact that g=Dgg = \mathscr{D}g. In the general case, argue by induction on the dimension of ρ\rho: if NN is a sub-gg-module of MM distinct from {0}\{0\} and MM, use the exact sequence:

H1(g,N)→H1(g,M)→H1(g,M/N) H^1(g, N) \to H^1(g, M) \to H^1(g, M/N)

established in Exercise 12 (f) of § 3.) Hence recover Remark 2 of no. 2.

(c) Deduce from (b) a proof of Theorem 2. (Use Exercise 12 (g) of § 3.) Deduce also from (b) that every derivation of gg is inner. (Use Exercise 12 (h) of § 3.)

(d) For all ρ\rho, H2(g,M)={0}H^2(g, M) = \{0\}. (Arguing as for (b), it suffices to consider the case where ρ=0\rho = 0. Let c∈H2(g,M)c \in H^2(g, M). Consider, following Exercise 12 (i) of § 3, the central extension hh of gg by MM defined by cc. The adjoint representation of hh defines a representation of gg on hh. By Theorem 2, MM admits in hh a supplement which is stable under gg and hence the extension is trivial. Hence c=0c = 0 by Exercise 12 (i) of § 3.)

(e) Deduce from (b) and (d) a proof of Theorem 5. (As in the text, it can be reduced to the case where the radical is commutative.)

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.