Bourbaki

Exercise 20, § 10

General Topology, I, 153

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

a) Let X be a non-empty compact space and R a Hausdorff equivalence relation on X. Show that X/RX/R is closed in the space P0(X)\mathfrak{P}_0(X) with the topology TΘ\mathfrak{T}_\Theta (§ 8, Exercise 12) if and only if the relation R is open. [Use Exercise 13 of § 9 and Exercise 16 of § 3 to show that if X/RX/R is closed in P0(X)\mathfrak{P}_0(X) in the topology TΘ\mathfrak{T}_\Theta, then the quotient topology on X/RX/R coincides with that induced by TΘ\mathfrak{T}_\Theta, and then apply Exercise 7 of § 5. Conversely, if R is open, use Exercise 29 of § 8 to show that X/RX/R is closed with respect to TΘ\mathfrak{T}_\Theta].

b) Let X be the locally compact subspace of the real plane R2\mathbf{R}^2 consisting of the points (1/n,y)(1/n, y) where n is an integer > 0 and −1≤y≤1-1 \leq y \leq 1, and the points (0,y)(0, y) where either −1≤y<0-1 \leq y < 0 or 0<y≤10 < y \leq 1 or y=2y = 2. Let pp be the restriction of pr1pr_1 to X, and R the equivalence relation associated with pp. Show that R is neither open nor closed, but that X/RX/R is compact and closed in P0(X)\mathfrak{P}_0(X) in the topology TΘ\mathfrak{T}_\Theta. \

(*) If the locally compact space X is not σ\sigma-compact, it can happen that the equivalence relation R on X is closed [and a fortiori has a closed graph (§ 8, no. 6, Proposition 14)] but that X/RX/R is not Hausdorff [cf. Chapter IX, § 4, Exercises 9 b) and 14].

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.