1. Topologies on groups
1. Topological groups
In the first four sections of this chapter the law of composition of a group will generally be written multiplicatively, and e shall denote the identity element; translation of results into additive notation (which, we recall, is reserved exclusively to commutative groups) is usually left to the reader.
Definition 1
A topological group is a set G which carries a group structure and a topology and satisfies the following two axioms:
(GT_I). The mapping of into is continuous.
(GT_{II}). The mapping of into (the symmetry of the group G) is continuous.
A group structure and a topology on a set G are said to be compatible if they satisfy (GT_I) and (GT_{II}).
Example 1
The discrete topology on a group G is compatible with the group structure. A topological group whose topology is discrete is called a discrete group.
Again, the coarsest topology (Chapter I, § 2, no. 2) on G is compatible with the group structure of G.
Example 2
\* In Chapter IV we shall see that the topology of the rational line Q (resp. the real line R) is compatible with the additive group structure of Q (resp. R).
Example 3
If G is a topological group, its topology is compatible with the structure of the group which is the opposite of G; , with this topology, is said to be the topological group opposite to G.
Axioms and are equivalent to the following:
(GT'). The mapping of into is continuous.
Clearly and together imply (GT'). Conversely, (GT') implies , for is then continuous; and (GT') and together imply , for is then continuous.
If is any element of , the left translation (resp. the right translation ) is continuous, by , and is therefore a homeomorphism of onto . The mappings , as and run through , thus form a group of homeomorphisms of ; the mappings (resp. ), where runs through , form a subgroup of this group of homeomorphisms. Again, since the symmetry is an involutory permutation of , axiom shows that this mapping is a homeomorphism of onto .
If is an open (resp. closed) subset of , and if is any point of , then the sets and are open (resp. closed), for they are the transforms of under one of the preceding homeomorphisms. If is open and is any subset of , then and are open, because they are unions of open sets [axiom ]. If is a neighbourhood of in , then and are neighbourhoods of ; for if is an open neighbourhood of contained in , then and are open and contain .
On the other hand, need not be closed when is closed, even if is closed too (cf. § 4, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 1).
\* For example, in the additive group of the real line , the subgroup of the rational integers is closed, and so is the subgroup consisting of all integer multiples of an irrational number ; but the subgroup of , which is the set of all real numbers (where and take all integer values) is not closed in , as we shall see in Chapter V, § 1.
Again, let be the subset of the additive group of which consists of all pairs such that and ; and let be the set of all pairs , as runs through . and are closed, but is the set of all pairs such that , and is not closed in . \
Let be a topological space and let and be two mappings of into a topological group . If and are continuous at a point
(*) We recall that if and are two subsets of a group , then or denotes the set of all products where and ; denotes the set of all elements where . If consists of a single element , we write or (resp. or ) in place of (resp. ).
of X, then so are and (*), by Theorem 2 of Chapter I, § 2, no. 1. In particular, the continuous mappings of X into G form a subgroup of the group of all mappings of X into G.
Again, let and be two mappings of a set X, filtered by a filter , into a Hausdorff topological group G. If and exist, then so do and , and we have (Chapter I, § 7, no. 4, Proposition 9, Corollary 1)
(1)
When G is a commutative group, written additively, the axiom (GT') indicates that is a continuous mapping. If and are mappings of a topological space X into G, continuous at a point , then is continuous at this point. The formulas (1) and (2) can be transcribed similarly.
2. Neighbourhoods of a point in a topological group
Let be the neighbourhood filter of the identity element in a topological group G, and let be any point of G. Since and are homeomorphisms, it follows that the neighbourhood filter of is the family of sets , where V runs through , and is also the family of sets . Thus we know the neighbourhood filter of any point of a topological group as soon as we know the neighbourhood filter of the identity element of the group.
If we say that and are continuous at , we obtain (Chapter I, § 2, no. 1):
(GV_I). Given any , there exists such that .
(GV_{II}). Given any , we have .
Every filter on G which satisfies (GV_I) and (GV_{II}) also satisfies (GV_a). Given any , there exists such that . For by (GV_I), there exists such that , and by (GV_{II}) there exists such that ; hence and therefore .
Conversely, if a filter on G satisfies (GV_a), it follows first of all that belongs to every set ; for if is such that ,
() We recall that is the mapping and the mapping ; they should not be confused with and (when these are defined) (Set Theory*, R, § 2, nos. 6 and 11).
then, since is not empty, we have for every . The condition therefore implies that , so that whenever . Finally, if is such that , and is such that , we have . We see thus that is equivalent to the conjunction of and .
Finally, since is a homeomorphism which leaves fixed, has the following property:
For all and all , we have .
These three properties of the filter are characteristic:
Proposition 1
Let* be a group and let be a filter on satisfying the axioms , and . Then there is a unique topology on , compatible with the group structure of , for which is the neighbourhood filter of the identity element . For this topology the neighbourhood filter of any point is the same as each of the two filters and .
If there is a topology with the required properties, then by what has been said above the neighbourhood filter of coincides with each of the filters and ; hence the topology is unique, if it exists. Its existence will be established if we show 1) that the filters are the neighbourhood filters of a topology on , and 2) that this topology is compatible with the group structure of .
1) The filter satisfies axiom (see Chapter I § 1, no. 2) by reason of and , as we have already seen; hence to show that is the neighbourhood filter of in a topology on , we have to verify axiom . Let then be any set of , and a set of such that ; then for any we have , so that belongs to the filter ; hence is satisfied.
2) Let us now show that the topology defined by the neighbourhood filters satisfies . Let be any two points of ; if we put and , then we have to show that is as near as we please to whenever and are close enough to . Now ; let be any neighbourhood of , then we shall have if , and by reason of . But by and there exists such that ; hence it is enough to take and in order to have . This completes the proof.
A common method of defining a topology compatible with a group structure on consists in giving a filter satisfying the axioms , and . The corresponding conditions for a filter base are as follows:
Given any , there exists such that .
(GV_{II}). Given any , there exists such that .
(GV'_{III}). Given any and any , there exists such that .
A neighbourhood of which coincides with its image under the symmetry is said to be symmetric. If is any neighbourhood of , then , and are symmetric neighbourhoods. By (GV_{II}), the symmetric neighbourhoods form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of . Also it follows from (GV_{I}) that when runs through a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of , the sets (where is a fixed integer ) form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of .
Remark
If is commutative, we have for every subset of and every , and therefore (GV_{III}) [resp. (GV'_{III})] is automatically satisfied for every filter (resp. filter base) on . On the other hand, if is not abelian, then (GV_{III}) is not a consequence of (GV_{I}) and (GV_{II}) [see Exercise 5].
If is a commutative group, written additively, the axioms which characterize the filter of neighbourhoods of the origin for a topology compatible with the group structure of are therefore the following:
(GA_{I}). Given any , there exists such that .
(GA_{II}). Given any , we have .
Proposition 2
A topological group* is Hausdorff if and only if the set is closed.
Clearly, if is Hausdorff, then is closed. Conversely, if is closed, then the diagonal of is closed, because it is the inverse image of under the continuous mapping ; hence (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Proposition 1) is Hausdorff.
Corollary
A topological group* is Hausdorff if and only if the intersection of the neighbourhoods of consists only of the point .
The condition is clearly necessary. Conversely, if the intersection of all the neighbourhoods of is just , then given any there is a neighbourhood of such that and therefore . This shows that is not in the closure of , and thus is closed, so that is Hausdorff.
Example
Definition of a topology on a group by means of a set of subgroups.* If is a filter base on a group , formed of subgroups of , then it is immediately seen that satisfies axioms (GV_{I}) and (GV_{II}), since for any subgroup of . Hence the set will be a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in a topology compatible with the group structure of , provided that satisfies (GV_{III}); this will in particular be the case if all the subgroups in are normal, hence always if is commutative. The topology thus defined is Hausdorff, by Proposition 2, if and only if the intersection of all the subgroups in consists only of . The most interesting cases are those in which the subgroup is not in (otherwise the topology defined by is the discrete topology): if , the topology defined by is Hausdorff only if is an infinite set.
Since the intersection of two subgroups is a subgroup, we can define a topology on , compatible with its group structure, starting from any set of subgroups of : let be the set of all subgroups , where and , and let be the set of all finite intersections of subgroups belonging to . Then is a filter base and satisfies (GV).
Consider in particular the additive group of a ring . Every set of ideals of defines a topology compatible with this additive group structure. This topology is Hausdorff if the intersection of all the ideals of is the zero ideal, and it is not discrete if no finite intersection of the ideals of is the zero ideal. Topologies defined in this way play a large part in the theory of numbers (see the Exercises of §§ 6 and 7 of this chapter).
3. Isomorphisms and local isomorphisms
In accordance with the general definitions (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 1, no. 5) an isomorphism of a topological group onto a topological group is a bijective mapping of onto which is simultaneously an isomorphism of the group structure of onto that of , and a homeomorphism of onto . In other words, is an isomorphism of onto if and only if: 1) is bijective; 2) for all ; and 3) is bicontinuous.
For example, if is any point of , the mapping is an isomorphism of onto , that is (loc. cit.), an automorphism of the topological group . It is called an inner automorphism.
If a topology is compatible with the group structure of a group , then is also compatible with the group structure opposite to that of . If denotes the topological group obtained by giving the group opposite to the topology , then the symmetry is an isomorphism of the topological group onto the topological group .
Definition 2
If* and are two topological groups, a local isomorphism of with is a homeomorphism of a neighbourhood of the identity element of onto a neighbourhood of the identity element of *which satisfies the following conditions:
1) For each pair of points of such that ,
2) If g is the mapping inverse to f, then for each pair of points x', y' of V' such that x'y' ∈ V', we have g(x'y') = g(x') g(y'). The mapping g is then a local isomorphism of G' with G. Two topological groups G, G' are said to be locally isomorphic if there exists a local isomorphism of G with G'.
Isomorphic topological groups are evidently locally isomorphic. The converse is false.
\* For example, we shall see in Chapter V, § 1, that the topological groups R and T are locally isomorphic but not isomorphic. \*
If f is a local isomorphism of G with G', then every restriction of f to a neighbourhood of the identity element of G is again a local isomorphism of G with G'.
A local isomorphism of G with G is called a local automorphism of G.
In general, if f is a homeomorphism of a neighbourhood V of the identity element of G onto a neighbourhood V' of the identity element of G' which satisfies condition 1) of Definition 2, f does not necessarily satisfy condition 2) (see Exercise 7). Nevertheless, G and G' are in fact locally isomorphic.
Proposition 3
Let G and G' be two topological groups, and let f be a homeomorphism of a neighbourhood V of the identity element of G onto a neighbourhood V' of the identity element of G', which satisfies condition 1) of Definition 2. Then f is an extension of a local isomorphism of G with G'.
For it is not hard to see that if W is a neighbourhood of the identity element of G such that W.W ⊂ V, then the restriction of f to W is a local isomorphism of G with G'.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.