Bourbaki

2. Subgroups, quotient groups, homomorphisms, homogeneous spaces, product groups

1. Subgroups of a topological group

Let G be a topological group and let H be a subgroup of G. By (GT'), the topology induced on H by the topology of G is compatible with the group structure of H. The structure of a topological group thus defined on HH is said to be induced by that of GG. Whenever we consider a subgroup HH of GG as a topological group, it is always this induced structure which is under consideration, unless the contrary is expressly stated.

Proposition 1

The closure H‾\overline{H} of a subgroup HH of a topological group GG is a subgroup of GG. If HH is a normal subgroup of GG, then so is H‾\overline{H}.

If a,b∈H‾a, b \in \overline{H} then ab−1∈H‾ab^{-1} \in \overline{H}, because the mapping (x,y)→xy−1(x, y) \to xy^{-1} is continuous on G×GG \times G and transforms H×HH \times H into HH (Chapter I, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1). In the same way, the continuity of the mapping x→axa−1x \to axa^{-1} shows that if HH is normal then H‾\overline{H} is normal.

In particular, the closure NN of the set {e}\{ e \} consisting only of the identity element of GG, is a normal subgroup of GG; and N={e}N = \{ e \} if and only if GG is Hausdorff (§\S 1, no. 2, Proposition 2).

Proposition 2

If GG is a Hausdorff topological group, then the closure of a commutative subgroup of GG is a commutative subgroup of GG.

By reason of Proposition 1, we may limit ourselves to the case where HH is dense in GG. The continuous functions xyxy and yxyx are equal on H×HH \times H, and are therefore equal on G×GG \times G, by virtue of the principle of extension of identities (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Proposition 2, Corollary 1).

Proposition 3

Let GG be a Hausdorff topological group and let MM be any subset of GG. Then the set M′M' of elements of GG which commute with each element of MM is a closed subgroup of GG. In particular, the centre of GG is closed in GG.

For M′M' is the intersection of the sets Fm(m∈M)F_m (m \in M), where FmF_m is the set of all x∈Gx \in G such that xm=mxxm = mx; and FmF_m is closed (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Proposition 2).

Proposition 4

Let GG be a topological group and let HH be a subgroup of GG which is locally closed at one point of HH (Chapter I, § 3, no. 3, Definition 2). Then HH is closed in GG.

By translation, HH is locally closed at each of its points, i.e. HH is locally closed in GG. Let VV be a symmetric open neighbourhood of ee in GG such that V∩HV \cap H is closed in VV. If x∈H‾x \in \overline{H}, then xVxV meets HH; if y∈xV∩Hy \in xV \cap H, we have x∈yVx \in yV, and y(V∩H)=(yV)∩Hy(V \cap H) = (yV) \cap H is closed in yVyV. But xx lies in the closure of (yV)∩H(yV) \cap H, hence x∈Hx \in H.

Corollary

A subgroup of a topological group is open if and only if it has an interior point. Every open subgroup is closed.

If a subgroup HH has an interior point, then by translation all the points of HH are interior and so HH is open. The second assertion of the corollary is a particular case of Proposition 4.

Proposition 5

A subgroup HH of a topological group GG is discrete if and only if HH has an isolated point. Every discrete subgroup of a Hausdorff group is closed.

If HH is discrete, every point of HH is isolated. Conversely if HH has an isolated point, then by translation every point of HH is isolated and therefore HH is discrete. If HH is discrete and GG is Hausdorff, then there is a neighbourhood VV of ee such that V∩H={e}V \cap H = \{e\}; {e}\{e\} is closed in GG and therefore a fortiori in VV, so that HH is locally closed at ee. Hence HH is closed in GG by Proposition 4.

Remark

Let HH be any subgroup of a topological group GG. For each x∈H‾x \in \overline{H} we have xH‾=xx \overline{H} = x. H‾=H‾\overline{H} = \overline{H}, since translation by xx is a homeomorphism of GG onto GG. In other words, for each x∈H‾x \in \overline{H}, xHxH is dense in H‾\overline{H}. It follows that if HH is not closed, then H‾∩CH\overline{H} \cap CH is dense in H‾\overline{H}.

2. Components of a topological group

Let VV be a symmetric neighbourhood of ee in GG. The subgroup generated by VV, which is denoted by V∞V^\infty consists of all products ∏i=1nxi\prod_{i=1}^n x_i of finite sequences of elements of VV. V∞V^\infty is open, since it has ee as an interior point, and is therefore closed by Proposition 4 of no. 1. It follows that:

Proposition 6

A connected topological group is generated by every neighbourhood of the identity element.

The converse of this proposition is in general false, as we shall see in Chapter IV (§ 2, no. 5). If a topological group GG is generated by each neighbourhood of the identity element, the most we can say is that GG contains no open subgroup other than GG.

\* As an example of a non-connected group GG which has an open subgroup distinct from GG, we may cite the multiplicative group R∗\mathbf{R}^* of non-zero real numbers, in which the subgroup R+∗\mathbf{R}_+^* of real numbers >0> 0 is both open and closed (see Chapter IV, § 3, no. 2). \*

Proposition 7

In a topological group GG, the component KK of the identity element ee is a closed normal subgroup. The component of any point x∈Gx \in G is the coset x.K=K.xx.K = K.x.

If a∈Ka \in K, then a−1Ka^{-1}K is connected and contains ee; hence K−1K⊂KK^{-1}K \subset K, which shows that KK is a subgroup of GG. This subgroup is invariant under all automorphisms of GG, and in particular under all inner automorphisms, therefore KK is normal in GG; also KK is closed (Chapter I, , no. 5, Proposition 9). Finally, the left translation y→xyy \to xy is a homeomorphism of GG which sends ee to xx, and hence the component of xx is x.Kx.K

The component of the identity element ee of GG is called the identity component of GG.

3. Dense subgroups

The following Proposition generalizes Proposition 1 of no. 1:

Proposition 8

Let HH be a dense subgroup of a topological group GG, and let KK be a normal subgroup of HH. Then the closure K‾\overline{K} of KK in GG is a normal subgroup of GG.

For the mapping (z,x)→zxz−1(z, x) \to zxz^{-1} is continuous on G×GG \times G, and maps H×KH \times K into KK; hence (Chapter I, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1) it maps G×K‾=H‾×KG \times \overline{K} = \overline{H} \times K into K‾\overline{K}.

Proposition 9

Let HH be a dense subgroup of a topological group GG. If HH is generated by every neighbourhood of the identity element in HH, then GG is generated by every neighbourhood of the identity element in GG.

Let VV be any symmetric neighbourhood of ee in GG. Then V∩HV \cap H is a neighbourhood of ee in HH, and hence generates HH. It follows that VV generates a subgroup H′H' which contains HH; but H′H' is open and closed (no. 1, Corollary to Proposition 4), and therefore contains H‾=G\overline{H} = G.

4. Spaces with operators

Let XX be a topological space and let GG be a topological group. GG is said to operate continuously on XX if the following conditions are satisfied:

1) XX has GG as a group of operators; in other words XX is endowed with an external law of composition (s,x)→s.x(s, x) \to s.x for which GG is the set of operators, and which is such that s.(t.x)=(st).xs.(t.x) = (st).x and e.x=xe.x = x for all s,t∈Gs, t \in G and all x∈Xx \in X.

2) The mapping (s,x)→s.x(s, x) \to s.x of G×XG \times X into XX is continuous.

Lemma 1

If a topological group* GG operates continuously on a topological space XX, then for each s∈Gs \in G the mapping x→s.xx \to s.x is a homeomorphism of XX onto XX.

For this mapping is a continuous bijection whose inverse x→s−1.xx \to s^{-1}.x is also continuous.

We recall that for each x∈Xx \in X the set G.xG.x of transforms s.xs.x of xx by the elements ss of GG is called the orbit of xx (with respect to the group of operators GG), and that the set of all s∈Gs \in G such that s.x=xs.x = x is a subgroup of GG called the stabilizer of xx. The relation R(x,y):"yR(x, y) : "y belongs to the orbit of x"x" is an equivalence relation on XX, called the equivalence relation defined by GG; the equivalence classes with respect to this relation are the orbits of the points of XX. The topological space X/RX/R is called the orbit space of XX (with respect to GG), or the quotient space of XX by the group GG, and is denoted by X/GX/G; and the topology of X/GX/G is said to be the quotient of the topology of XX by GG.

Lemma 2

If a topological group* GG operates continuously on a topological space XX, then the equivalence relation RR defined by GG is open.

For the saturation with respect to RR of an open subset UU of XX is the set ⋃s∈Gs.U\bigcup_{s \in G} s.U, and each s.Us.U is open by Lemma 1.

Example 1

Let HH be a subgroup of a topological group GG. HH operates continuously on GG by the external law (s,x)→sx(s, x) \to sx. HH also operates continuously on GG by the external law (x,s)→sxs−1(x, s) \to sxs^{-1}.

Example 2

\* If KK is a topological division ring (§6§ 6, no. 7), the multiplicative group K∗K^* operates continuously on KK by the external law (s,x)→sx(s, x) \to sx. \

Example 3

Let GG be a topological group, XX a topological space. Then the mapping (s,x)→x(s, x) \to x of G×XG \times X into XX is an external law of composition on XX, and GG operates continuously on XX with respect to this law; GG is then said to operate trivially on XX.

Remark

Instead of saying that a topological group GG operates continuously on a topological space XX, it is often said that GG operates continuously on the left on XX. When the topological group G0G^0 opposite to GG operates continuously on XX, we say that GG operates continuously on the right on XX. It comes to the same thing to say that XX has a continuous external law of composition (s,x)→s.x(s, x) \to s.x with GG as set of operators, such that s.(t.x)=(ts).xs.(t.x) = (ts).x and e.x=xe.x = x. Such a law is often written on the right : (s,x)→x.s(s, x) \to x.s (whence the terminology), and we have then (x.t).s=x.(ts)(x.t).s = x.(ts). If GG operates continuously on the right on XX by the law (s,x)→x.s(s, x) \to x.s, then also GG operates continuously on the left on XX according to the external law (s,x)→x.s−1(s, x) \to x.s^{-1}, by virtue of axiom (GTII_{II}).

Let XX (resp. X′X') be a set with a group of operators GG (resp. G′G') and let f:G→G′f : G \to G' be a homomorphism and g:X→X′g : X \to X' a mapping. ff and gg are said to be compatible if g(s.x)=f(s).g(x)g(s.x) = f(s).g(x) for all s∈Gs \in G and all x∈Xx \in X. If X′′X'' is a third set with a group of operators G′′G'', if f′:G′→G′′f' : G' \to G'' is a homomorphism, g′:X′→X′′g' : X' \to X'' a mapping, and if f′f' and g′g' are compatible, then f′∘ff' \circ f and g′∘gg' \circ g are compatible. When X,X′X, X' are topological spaces and G,G′G, G' are topological groups operating continuously on X,X′X, X' respectively, (f,g)(f, g) is said to be a morphism of the space with operators XX into the space with operators X′X', provided that ff and gg are continuous and compatible. Passing to the quotients, gg then induces a continuous mapping X/G→X′/G′X/G \to X'/G' (Chapter I, , no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 6)

Let GG be a topological group operating continuously on a topological space XX, and let φ\varphi be the canonical mapping of XX onto the orbit space X/GX/G. Let AA be any subset of XX, and let A′A' be the subspace of XX which is the saturation of AA with respect to the equivalence relation RR defined by GG (thus A′A' is the union of the orbits of points of AA, and is said to be the saturation of AA with respect to GG). GG operates continuously on A′A' by the restriction of (s,x)→s.x(s, x) \to s.x to G×A′G \times A'. Moreover, since RR is open (Lemma 2) and A′A' is saturated, it follows from Proposition 4 of Chapter I, § 5, no. 2, and from the relation φ(A)=φ(A′)\varphi(A) = \varphi(A'), that:

Proposition 10

The canonical bijection of the subspace φ(A)\varphi(A) of X/GX/G onto the orbit space A′/GA'/G is a homeomorphism.

Now let SS be an equivalence relation on XX such that, for each s∈Gs \in G, the mapping x→s.xx \to s.x is compatible with SS [in other words, such that the relation x≡y(modS)x \equiv y \pmod{S} implies s.x≡s.y(modS)s.x \equiv s.y \pmod{S}]; for the sake of brevity we shall say that the relation SS is compatible with the group GG. If ψ\psi is the canonical mapping of XX onto X/SX/S, and if s.ψ(x)s.\psi(x) denotes the class mod SS of s.xs.x, then X/SX/S has GG as groups of operators with respect to the external law (s,ψ(x))→s.ψ(x)=ψ(s.x)(s, \psi(x)) \to s.\psi(x) = \psi(s.x). Moreover:

Proposition 11

If the equivalence relation SS on XX is open and compatible with GG, then GG operates continuously on X/SX/S.

Since the relation of equality on GG and the relation SS on XX are open, it is enough to show that the mapping (s,x)→s.ψ(x)=ψ(s.x)(s, x) \to s.\psi(x) = \psi(s.x) of G×XG \times X into X/SX/S is continuous (Chapter I, § 5, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 8); but this follows from the continuity of ψ\psi and of the mapping

(s,x)→s.x. (s, x) \to s.x.

Remark

Let G′G' be another topological group operating continuously on XX, and suppose that s.(s′x)=s′(s.x)s.(s'x) = s'(s.x) for all s∈G,s′∈G′s \in G, s' \in G' and x \in X. Then the equivalence relation S defined by G' is compatible with G, and since S is open (Lemma 2) it follows that G operates continuously on X/G'. Similarly, G' operates continuously on X/G. In these circumstances the two operations of the two groups G and G' on X are said to commute.

5. Homogeneous spaces

Let G be a topological group and H a subgroup of G. H operates continuously on the right on G according to the external law (t,x)→xt(t, x) \to xt, and the orbit of a point x∈Gx \in G is the left coset xHxH. The set of orbits is therefore what we have called in algebra the homogeneous space G/HG/H. Whenever we speak of G/HG/H as a topological space, we shall always mean the orbit space of G (with respect to H) unless the contrary is expressly stated; i.e. the quotient space of G by the equivalence relation x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H. In conformity with the general definitions, we say that the topology of this space is the quotient by H of the topology of G.

Proposition 12

The group G operates continuously on every homogeneous space G/HG/H.

Since the equivalence relation x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H is open (no. 4, Lemma 2) this is a particular case of Proposition 11 of no. 4.

Proposition 13

Let G be a topological group and let H be a subgroup of G. Then the homogeneous space G/HG/H is Hausdorff if and only if H is closed in G.

H is an equivalence class for the relation x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H and therefore, if G/HG/H is Hausdorff, H is closed in G. Conversely, if H is closed, then the graph of this relation is closed in G×GG \times G, since it is the inverse image of H under the continuous mapping (x,y)→x−1y(x, y) \to x^{-1}y. Since the relation x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H is open, it follows from Chapter I, § 8, no. 3, Proposition 8 that G/HG/H is Hausdorff.

Proposition 14

Let G be a topological group and let H be a subgroup of G. Then the homogeneous space G/HG/H is discrete if and only if H is open in G.

For the inverse images in G of the points of G/HG/H under the canonical mapping are the cosets xHxH (x∈Gx \in G); and these sets are open in G if and only if H is open in G.

Let X be a topological space on which a topological group G operates continuously and transitively; X is then (in the algebraic sense) a homogeneous space of G. Let x be a point of X, H_x its stabilizer. The continuous surjection s → s.x of G onto X factorizes canonically as

G→fxG/Hx→gxX G \xrightarrow{f_x} G/H_x \xrightarrow{g_x} X

where f_x is the canonical mapping of G onto the homogeneous space G/H_x, and g_x is the bijection s.H_x → s.x of G/H_x onto X; moreover (Chapter I, § 3, no. 4, Proposition 6) g_x is a continuous mapping. But g_x is not necessarily a homeomorphism of G/H_x onto X (Exercise 29). If g_x is a homeomorphism for each x ∈ X, then we say that X is a topological homogeneous space (of the topological group G); for this to be so it is necessary and sufficient that, for each x ∈ E, the mapping s → s.x of G into X should be open.

Proposition 15

Let X be a topological space on which a topological group G operates continuously and transitively. For X to be a topological homogeneous space (relative to G) it is sufficient that for some point x_0 ∈ X the mapping s → s.x_0 transforms each neighbourhood of e in G into a neighbourhood of x_0 in X.

Every x ∈ X can be written as x = t.x_0 for some t ∈ G. If V is a neighbourhood of e, then V.x = (Vt).x_0 is a neighbourhood of x, for we can write (Vt).x_0 = t((t^{-1}Vt).x_0), and the assertion follows from the facts that t^{-1}Vt is a neighbourhood of e in G and that y → t.y is a homeomorphism of X onto itself (no. 4, Lemma 1). It follows that if U is any open subset of G and if x is any point of X, then U.x is open in X; for if t ∈ U, then t^{-1}U is a neighbourhood of e, hence (t^{-1}U).x is a neighbourhood of x, and t.((t^{-1}U).x) = U.x is a neighbourhood of t.x. Hence U.x is open in X, so that the mapping s → s.x of G into X is open. This completes the proof.

6. Quotient groups

Proposition 16

Let G be a topological group and let H be a normal subgroup of G. Then the quotient by H of the topology of G is compatible with the group structure of G/H.

If x → x̂ is the canonical mapping of G onto G/H, then we have to show that (x̂, ŷ) → x̂ŷ^{-1} is a continuous mapping of (G/H) × (G/H) into G/H. Since the equivalence relation x^{-1}y ∈ H is open (no. 4, Lemma 2), it is enough to show that (x, y) → x̂ŷ^{-1} is a continuous mapping of G × G into G/H (Chapter I, § 5, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 8, and § 3, no. 4, Proposition 6). But (x, y) → x̂ŷ^{-1} is the composition of the continuous mappings x → x̂ and (x, y) → xy^{-1}, hence is continuous.

Whenever in the sequel we consider a quotient group G/HG/H of a topological group GG as a topological group, it is always to be understood that the topology of G/HG/H is the quotient by HH of the topology of GG, unless the contrary is expressly stated.

Proposition 17

Let φ\varphi be the canonical mapping of a topological group GG onto a quotient group G/HG/H. If B\mathfrak{B} is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of ee in GG, then φ(B)\varphi(\mathfrak{B}) is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of the identity element φ(e)\varphi(e) of G/HG/H.

This is a particular case of Proposition 5 of Chapter I, § 5, no. 3.

Propositions 13 and 14 give in particular, for quotient groups:

Proposition 18

Let GG be a topological group and let HH be a normal subgroup of GG. a) *The quotient group G/HG/H is Hausdorff if and only if HH is closed in GG. b) *The quotient group G/HG/H is discrete if and only if HH is open in GG.

If GG is a topological group and NN is the closure of {e}\{e\} in GG, then NN is a closed normal subgroup of GG (no. 1, Proposition 1), hence G/NG/N is Hausdorff; G/NG/N is called the Hausdorff group associated with GG.

Proposition 19

If HH is a discrete normal subgroup of a topological group GG, then G/HG/H is locally isomorphic to GG.

Let VV be a neighbourhood of ee in GG which does not contain any point of HH other than ee, and let WW be a symmetric open neighbourhood of ee in GG such that W2⊂VW^2 \subset V. Then the restriction to WW of the canonical mapping φ\varphi of GG onto G/HG/H is injective; for if x,y∈Wx, y \in W and φ(x)=φ(y)\varphi(x) = \varphi(y), then x−1y∈W2⊂Vx^{-1}y \in W^2 \subset V and x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H, so that x=yx = y. By Proposition 17 it follows that the restriction of φ\varphi to WW is a homeomorphism of WW onto φ(W)\varphi(W); since moreover φ(xy)=φ(x)φ(y)\varphi(xy) = \varphi(x)\varphi(y) for all x,y∈Wx, y \in W, we conclude that GG and G/HG/H are locally isomorphic (§ 1, no. 3, Proposition 3).

7. Subgroups and quotient groups of a quotient group

Let GG be a topological group, let HH be a normal subgroup of GG, and let φ:G→G/H\varphi : G \to G/H be the canonical mapping. We know that if A′A' is a subgroup of G/HG/H, then φ‾(A′)\overline{\varphi}(A') is a subgroup of GG which contains HH. Conversely, if AA is a subgroup of GG, then φ(A)\varphi(A) is a subgroup of G/HG/H; moreover, there is a canonical bijection of the quotient group A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) onto the subgroup φ(A)\varphi(A) of G/HG/H, and a canonical bijection of φ(A)\varphi(A) onto the quotient group AH/HAH/H, and both these bijections are isomorphisms for the group structures.

Proposition 20

Let AA be a subgroup of a topological group GG, let HH be a normal subgroup of GG, and let φ\varphi denote the canonical mapping of GG onto G/HG/H. Then the canonical bijection of φ(A)\varphi(A) onto AH/HAH/H is an isomorphism of topological groups.

This follows from the preceding remarks, and from Proposition 10 of no. 4.

The canonical bijection of A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) onto φ(A)\varphi(A) is a continuous homomorphism, since it arises from the restriction of φ\varphi to AA by passing to the quotients; but in general the topological groups A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) and AH/HAH/H are not isomorphic (cf. § 4, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 3).

\* For example, take GG to be the additive group R\mathbf{R} of real numbers, take HH to be the group Z\mathbf{Z} of integers, and take AA to be the group θZ\theta \mathbf{Z} of integer multiples of an irrational number θ\theta. Then A∩H={0}A \cap H = \{0\}, so that A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H) is a discrete group, isomorphic to Z\mathbf{Z}; on the other hand, A+HA + H is dense in R\mathbf{R} (as we shall see in Chapter V, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 1), hence (A+H)/H(A + H)/H, which is locally isomorphic to A+HA + H (no. 6, Proposition 19), is not a discrete group and consequently is not isomorphic to A/(A∩H)A/(A \cap H). \*

Nevertheless, we have the following proposition:

Proposition 21

Let GG be a topological group, G0G_0 a dense subgroup of GG, H0H_0 a normal subgroup of G0G_0, HH the closure of H0H_0 in GG and φ\varphi the canonical mapping G→G/HG \to G/H. Then the canonical bijection G0/H0→φ(G0)G_0/H_0 \to \varphi(G_0) is an isomorphism of the topological group G0/H0G_0/H_0 onto a dense subgroup of G/HG/H.

Since H0=H∩G0H_0 = H \cap G_0, it is enough to show that if U0U_0 is any open subset of G0G_0 which is saturated with respect to the relation x−1y∈H0x^{-1}y \in H_0, then U0U_0 is the intersection of G0G_0 and an open subset of GG which is saturated with respect to the relation x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H (Chapter I, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 10). Let UU be an open subset of GG such that U0=U∩G0U_0 = U \cap G_0. Since U0=U0H0U_0 = U_0 H_0, it is easily seen that U0=UH0∩G0U_0 = U H_0 \cap G_0; but UH0U H_0 is open in GG, so we may suppose that U=UH0U = U H_0. The set UHU H is open in GG and is saturated with respect to the relation x−1y∈Hx^{-1}y \in H; hence the proposition will be proved if we show that UH∩G0=U0U H \cap G_0 = U_0. Now, if u∈Uu \in U and h∈Hh \in H are such that uh∈G0u h \in G_0, then there is a symmetric neighbourhood VV of ee in GG such that uV⊂Uu V \subset U; since VhV h is a neighbourhood of hh in GG, there exists z∈Vz \in V such that zh∈H0z h \in H_0. But then we have uz−1∈Uu z^{-1} \in U, and uh=(uz−1)(zh)u h = (u z^{-1})(z h); therefore UH∩G0⊂UH0U H \cap G_0 \subset U H_0. But UH0=UU H_0 = U, hence UH∩G0⊂U∩G0=U0U H \cap G_0 \subset U \cap G_0 = U_0. This completes the proof.

Let GG be a topological group operating continuously on a topological space XX, and let KK be a normal subgroup of GG which is contained in the stabilizer of each point of XX. For each x∈Xx \in X, the relation s≡t(modK)s \equiv t \pmod{K} therefore implies s.x=t.xs.x = t.x, and passing to the quotient we define a mapping s→s.xs \to s.x of G/KG/K into XX. It is immediately verified that with respect to the external law (s′,x)→s′.x(s', x) \to s'.x, X has G/K as a group of operators. Moreover, G/K operates continuously on X with respect to this law; for the relation of equality on X and the relation s≡t(modK)s \equiv t \pmod{K} on G are both open equivalence relations, and therefore the result follows from the continuity of the mapping

(s,x)→s′.x=s.x(s, x) \to s'.x = s.x

of G×XG \times X into X (Chapter I, § 5, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 8, and § 3, no. 4, Proposition 6).

Now let G be a topological group operating continuously on a topological space X, and let H be any normal subgroup of G; then H operates continuously on X. Let S be the equivalence relation defined by H on X; then S is open (no. 4, Lemma 2). The relation S is compatible with the group G (no. 4); for if y≡x(modS)y \equiv x \pmod{S} then there exists t∈Ht \in H such that y=t.xy = t.x; hence for all s∈Gs \in G we have s.y=(sts−1).s.xs.y = (sts^{-1}).s.x, and sts−1∈Hsts^{-1} \in H since H is normal in G; thus s.y≡s.x(modS)s.y \equiv s.x \pmod{S}. If ψ\psi is the canonical mapping of X onto X/S, the group G therefore operates continuously on X/S with respect to the external law

(s,ψ(x))→ψ(s.x)(s, \psi(x)) \to \psi(s.x)

(no. 4, Proposition 11). Moreover, the group H is contained in the stabilizer of each of the points of X/S; as we have seen above, G/H operates continuously on X/S=X/HX/S = X/H with respect to the external law (s′,ψ(x))→ψ(s.x)(s', \psi(x)) \to \psi(s.x). If R denotes the equivalence relation on X defined by G, then the relation S implies R, and the equivalence relation R/S on X/S is that defined by the group G/H. Hence (Chapter I, § 3, no. 4, Proposition 7):

Proposition 22

Let G be a topological group operating continuously on a topological space X, and let H be a normal subgroup of G. Then the canonical bijection of X/G onto (X/H)/(G/H)(X/H)/(G/H) is a homeomorphism.

Corollary

Let G be a topological group, H a normal subgroup of G, and K a normal subgroup of G which contains H. Then the canonical bijection of G/K onto (G/H)/(K/H)(G/H)/(K/H) is an isomorphism of topological groups.

We know already that this bijection is an isomorphism of groups, and Proposition 22 (applied to the group K operating on the right on G) shows that it is a homeomorphism.

8. Continuous homomorphisms and strict morphisms

Proposition 23

A homomorphism f of a topological group G into a topological group G′G' is continuous on G if and only if it is continuous at one point of G.

Suppose ff is continuous at a point a∈Ga \in G; then if V′V' is any neighbourhood of f(a)f(a), V=f−1‾(V′)V = \overline{f^{-1}}(V') is a neighbourhood of aa. Hence if xx is any point of GG, we have

f(xa−1V)=f(x)[f(a)]−1f(V)⊂f(x)[f(a)]−1V′, f(xa^{-1}V) = f(x)[f(a)]^{-1}f(V) \subset f(x)[f(a)]^{-1}V',
and therefore ff is continuous at xx.

A continuous homomorphism of a topological group GG into a topological group G′G' is also called a morphism of GG into G′G' for the topological group structures.

Let ff be a continuous homomorphism of a topological group GG into a topological group G′G'; the inverse image H=f−1‾(e′)H = \overline{f^{-1}}(e') of the identity element e′e' of G′G' is a normal subgroup of GG, and f(G)f(G) is a subgroup of G′G'. Consider the canonical factorization f=ψ∘f˙∘φf = \psi \circ \dot{f} \circ \varphi, where φ\varphi is the canonical mapping G→G/HG \to G/H, ψ\psi is the canonical injection f(G)→G′f(G) \to G' and lastly f˙\dot{f} is a continuous bijective homomorphism of the quotient group G/HG/H onto the subgroup f(G)f(G) (Chapter I, § 3, no. 5); f˙\dot{f} is said to be the bijective homomorphism associated with ff. In general, f˙\dot{f} is not an isomorphism of topological groups.

For example, let G′G' be a non-discrete topological group, and GG the topological group obtained by giving G′G' the discrete topology; then the identity mapping of GG into G′G' is a continuous bijective homomorphism, but is not bicontinuous.

Definition 1

A continuous homomorphism of a topological group GG into a topological group G′G' is said to be a strict morphism of GG into G′G' if the bijective homomorphism f˙\dot{f} of G/f−1‾(e′)G/\overline{f^{-1}}(e') onto f(G)f(G), associated with ff, is an isomorphism of topological groups (in other words, if f˙\dot{f} is bicontinuous).

An isomorphism of a topological group GG onto a topological group G′G' is therefore a bijective strict morphism of GG onto G′G'.

Proposition 24

Let ff be a continuous homomorphism of a topological group GG into a topological group G′G'. Then the following three statements are equivalent:* a) ff is a strict morphism. b) The image under ff of every open set in GG is an open set in f(G)f(G). c) *The image under ff of every neighbourhood of the identity element in GG is a neighbourhood of the identity element in G′G'.

In view of Lemma 2 of no. 4, the equivalence of a) and b) follows immediately from the definitions (Chapter I, § 5, no. 3, Proposition 5). The equivalence of b) and c) is a particular case of Proposition 15 of no. 5, if we observe that GG operates continuously on f(G)f(G) by the external law (s,f(t))→f(st)(s, f(t)) \to f(st).

Remark 1

From condition b) of Proposition 24 it follows that every continuous homomorphism of a topological group into a discrete group is a strict morphism.

If G is compact and f(G)f(G) is Hausdorff, then the bijective homomorphism ff associated with ff is bicontinuous (Chapter I, § 10, no. 2, Theorem 1, Corollary 2, and no. 1, Proposition 5, Corollary 4). Hence every continuous homomorphism of a compact group into a Hausdorff group is a strict morphism.

Remark 2

Let ff be a strict morphism of G into G′G' and let gg be a strict morphism of G′G' into G′′G''. If ff is surjective or if gg is injective, it follows immediately from Proposition 24 that g∘fg \circ f is a strict morphism of G into G′′G''. But this conclusion is no longer necessarily valid if neither of the two preceding conditions is satisfied, even if ff is injective and gg surjective (Exercise 19).

Remark 3

Let ff be a continuous homomorphism of a topological group G into a topological group G′G', and let H be a normal subgroup of G. ff induces a homomorphism gg of the group G/HG/H onto the quotient group f(G)/f(H)f(G)/f(H). This homomorphism gg is continuous. Moreover, if ff is a strict morphism of G into G′G', then gg is a strict morphism of G/HG/H onto f(G)/f(H)f(G)/f(H); for if U is open in G/HG/H, and if φ\varphi (resp. φ′\varphi') denotes the canonical mapping of G onto G/HG/H [resp. of f(G)f(G) onto f(G)/f(H)f(G)/f(H)], then we have g(u)=φ′(f(φ‾−1(u)))g(u) = \varphi'(f(\overline{\varphi}^{-1}(u))), and since φ‾−1(u)\overline{\varphi}^{-1}(u) is open in G, it follows that g(u)g(u) is open in f(G)/f(H)f(G)/f(H), which proves our assertion.

9. Products of topological groups

Let (Gi)i∈I(G_i)_{i \in I} be a family of topological groups. Then we can define a group structure on the product set

G=∏i∈IGi G = \prod_{i \in I} G_i

(the product of the group structures of the GiG_i) by defining (xi).(yi)=(xiyi)(x_i).(y_i) = (x_i y_i). If eie_i is the identity element of GiG_i, then e=(ei)e = (e_i) is the identity element of G, and we have (xi)−1=(xi−1)(x_i)^{-1} = (x_i^{-1}). The product topology (Chapter I, § 2, no. 3) of the topologies of the GiG_i is compatible with this group structure. For the mapping ((xi),(yi))→(xi,yi−1)((x_i), (y_i)) \to (x_i, y_i^{-1}) of G×GG \times G into G is the composition of the mapping ((xi,yi))→(xiyi−1)((x_i, y_i)) \to (x_i y_i^{-1}) of

∏i∈IGi×Gi into G, \prod_{i \in I} G_i \times G_i \text{ into } G,

and the canonical mapping ((xi),(yi))→((xi,yi))((x_i), (y_i)) \to ((x_i, y_i)) of

G×G onto ∏i∈I(Gi×Gi); G \times G \text{ onto } \prod_{i \in I} (G_i \times G_i);

and both these mappings are continuous (Chapter I, § 4, no. 1, Corollary 1 of Proposition 1, and Proposition 2).

Definition 2

The topological group obtained by giving the product set

G=∏i∈IGi G = \prod_{i \in I} G_i

the group structure which is the product of the group structures of the GiG_i and the topology which is the product of the topologies of the GiG_i is called the product of the topological groups GiG_i.

If (Jx)x∈K(J_x)_{x \in K} is a partition of II, then GG is isomorphic to the product of the topological groups ∏i∈JxGi\prod_{i \in J_x} G_i (associativity of the product).

If HiH_i is a subgroup of GiG_i, then the product of the topological groups HiH_i is isomorphic to the subgroup ∏i∈JHi\prod_{i \in J} H_i of ∏i∈IGi\prod_{i \in I} G_i. In particular, if JJ is any subset of II, and J′=CJJ' = C J, then the topological group ∏i∈JGi\prod_{i \in J} G_i is isomorphic to the normal subgroup GJ′=(∏i∈JGi)×(∏i∈J′{ei})G'_J = (\prod_{i \in J} G_i) \times (\prod_{i \in J'} \{e_i\}) of GG. Since the projection of every open set is an open set, the projection prJ\mathrm{pr}_J of GG onto ∏i∈JGi\prod_{i \in J} G_i is a strict morphism, and consequently the quotient group G/G′G/G' is isomorphic to GJ′G'_J; GG is isomorphic to the product GJ′×(G/GJ′)G'_J \times (G/G'_J).

Proposition 25

Let (Gi)i∈I(G_i)_{i \in I} be a family of topological groups, and let HH be the normal subgroup of G=∏i∈IGiG = \prod_{i \in I} G_i consisting of all x=(xi)x = (x_i) such that the xix_i are equal to the identity element eie_i of GiG_i except for a finite number of indices. Then the subgroup HH is dense in GG.

This is a particular case of Chapter I, § 4, no. 3, Proposition 8.

Let (Xi)i∈I(X_i)_{i \in I} be a family of topological spaces, and for each i∈Ii \in I let GiG_i be a topological group operating continuously on XiX_i. It is clear that the product group G=∏i∈IGiG = \prod_{i \in I} G_i then operates continuously on the product space X=∏i∈IXiX = \prod_{i \in I} X_i according to the law

((si),(xi))→(si⋅xi) ((s_i), (x_i)) \to (s_i \cdot x_i)

(Chapter I, § 4, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 1, and Proposition 2). Moreover the orbit under GG of a point x=(xi)x = (x_i) of XX is the product of the orbits of the xix_i (with respect to the groups GiG_i). Let φi\varphi_i be the canonical mapping of XiX_i onto Xi/GiX_i/G_i, and let φ=(φi)\varphi = (\varphi_i) be the product mapping of XX onto ∏i∈I(Xi/Gi)\prod_{i \in I} (X_i/G_i); then the preceding remark shows that the bijection canonically associated with φ\varphi maps the orbit space X/GX/G onto ∏i∈I(Xi/Gi)\prod_{i \in I} (X_i/G_i). Moreover:

Proposition 26

The bijection of* X/GX/G onto ∏i∈I(Xi/Gi)\prod_{i \in I} (X_i/G_i) canonically associated with (φi)(\varphi_i) is a homeomorphism. For since the φi\varphi_i are surjective and open, it follows that φ=(φi)\varphi = (\varphi_i) is an open mapping (Chapter I, , no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 8)

Corollary

Let* (Gi)i∈I(G_i)_{i \in I} be a family of topological groups, and for each i∈Ii \in I let HiH_i be a normal subgroup of GiG_i; let φi\varphi_i denote the canonical mapping of GiG_i onto Gi/HiG_i/H_i. Let G=∏i∈IGi, H=∏i∈IHiG = \prod_{i \in I} G_i, \ H = \prod_{i \in I} H_i. Then the bijective homomorphism of G/HG/H onto ∏i∈I(Gi/Hi)\prod_{i \in I} (G_i/H_i) associated with the continuous homomorphism (xi)→(φi(xi))(x_i) \to (\varphi_i(x_i)) *is an isomorphism of topological groups.

For this homomorphism is an isomorphism of group structures.

Remark

If GG is a commutative topological group, written additively, then the mapping (x,y)→x+y(x, y) \to x + y of G×GG \times G onto GG is a strict morphism. For since (x+x′)+(y+y′)=(x+y)+(x′+y′)(x + x') + (y + y') = (x + y) + (x' + y') it is a homomorphism of G×GG \times G onto GG; also it is continuous, and the image of a neighbourhood V×VV \times V of the origin in G×GG \times G under this mapping is the neighbourhood V+VV + V of the origin in GG.

10. Semi-direct products

Let L,NL, N be two subgroups of a group GG, such that LN=NLLN = NL; then LNLN is a subgroup of GG, since

(LN)(LN)−1=LNN−1L−1=LNL=LLN=LN (LN)(LN)^{-1} = LNN^{-1}L^{-1} = LNL = LLN = LN

Moreover, the mapping φ:(x,y)→xy\varphi : (x, y) \to xy of N×LN \times L into GG is injective if and only if N∩L={e}N \cap L = \{e\}. For it is clear that if φ\varphi is injective, then N∩L={e}N \cap L = \{e\}; and conversely, the relation x′y′=xyx'y' = xy, where x,x′∈Nx, x' \in N and y,y′∈Ly, y' \in L, implies that x−1x′=yy′−1∈N∩Lx^{-1}x' = {yy'}^{-1} \in N \cap L; hence if N∩L={e}N \cap L = \{e\}, then φ\varphi is injective. Thus φ\varphi is bijective if and only if LN=GLN = G and N∩L={e}N \cap L = \{e\}.

If NN is a normal subgroup of GG (or more generally is normal in some subgroup of GG containing N∪LN \cup L), the condition LN=NLLN = NL is automatically satisfied. Moreover, for each y∈Ly \in L the mapping σy:x→yxy−1\sigma_y : x \to yxy^{-1} is an automorphism of the group NN, and for any two elements u,vu, v of LL we have

(1)(1)
σuv=σu∘σv; \sigma_{uv} = \sigma_u \circ \sigma_v;

and for any x,x′x, x' in N\mathbf{N} and y,y′y, y' in L\mathbf{L} we have also

(2)(2)
(xy)(x′y′)=(xσy(x′))(yy′).(xy)(x'y') = (x\sigma_y(x'))(yy').

Conversely:

Proposition 27

Let N\mathbf{N} and L\mathbf{L} be two groups, e′e' and e′′e'' their respective identity elements. Suppose that we are given a homomorphism y→σyy \to \sigma_y of L\mathbf{L} into the group Γ\Gamma of automorphisms of N\mathbf{N}. Then:

1) On the product set S=N×LS = \mathbf{N} \times \mathbf{L}, the internal law of composition

(3)(3)
(x,y)(x′,y′)=(xσy(x′),yy′)(x, y)(x', y') = (x\sigma_y(x'), yy')
defines a group structure, for which j1:x→(x,e′′)j_1 : x \to (x, e'') is an isomorphism of N\mathbf{N} onto a normal subgroup of SS, j2:y→(e′,y)j_2 : y \to (e', y) is an isomorphism of L\mathbf{L} onto a subgroup of SS, and pr2:S→L\mathrm{pr}_2 : S \to \mathbf{L} is a surjective homomorphism whose kernel is j1(N)j_1(\mathbf{N}) and which is such that pr2∘j2\mathrm{pr}_2 \circ j_2 is the identity automorphism of L\mathbf{L}.

2) Let f:N→Gf : \mathbf{N} \to G, g:L→Gg : \mathbf{L} \to G be two homomorphisms into a group GG, such that

(4)(4)
f(σy(x))=g(y)f(x)g(y−1)f(\sigma_y(x)) = g(y)f(x)g(y^{-1})
for all x∈Nx \in \mathbf{N} and all y∈Ly \in \mathbf{L}. Then there is a unique homomorphism h:S→Gh : S \to G such that f=h∘j1f = h \circ j_1, and g=h∘j2g = h \circ j_2.

If x,x′,x′′x, x', x'' are elements of N\mathbf{N} and y,y′,y′′y, y', y'' are elements of L\mathbf{L}, then

((x,y)(x′,y′))(x′′,y′′)=(xσy(x′),yy′)(x′′,y′′)=(xσy(x′)σy′(x′′),yy′y′′) ((x, y)(x', y'))(x'', y'') = (x\sigma_y(x'), yy')(x'', y'') = (x\sigma_y(x')\sigma_{y'}(x''), yy'y'')
and
(x,y)((x′,y′)(x′′,y′′))=(x,y)(x′σy′(x′′),y′y′′)=(xσy(x′σy′(x′′)),yy′,y′′) (x, y)((x', y')(x'', y'')) = (x, y)(x'\sigma_{y'}(x''), y'y'') = (x\sigma_y(x'\sigma_{y'}(x'')), yy', y'')
and therefore the associativity of the law (3) follows from the facts that y→σyy \to \sigma_y is a homomorphism of L\mathbf{L} into Γ\Gamma and that σy\sigma_y is an automorphism of N\mathbf{N}. Clearly (e′,e′′)(e', e'') is the identity element of (3), and finally
(x,y)(σy−1(x−1),y−1)=(σy−1(x−1),y−1)(x,y)=(e′,e′′)(x, y)(\sigma_{y^{-1}}(x^{-1}), y^{-1}) = (\sigma_{y^{-1}}(x^{-1}), y^{-1})(x, y) = (e', e'')
so that (x,y)(x, y) has an inverse in SS. The other assertions of 1) are clear. On the other hand, since (x,y)=(x,e′′)(e′,y)(x, y) = (x, e'') (e', y), a homomorphism hh which satisfies the conditions of 2) must necessarily satisfy
h(x,y)=f(x)g(y),h(x, y) = f(x)g(y),
hence is unique if it exists; moreover it is immediate from (4) that
f(xσy(x′))g(yy′)=f(x)g(y)f(x′)g(y−1)g(y)g(y′)=f(x)g(y)f(x′)g(y′)f(x\sigma_y(x'))g(yy') = f(x)g(y)f(x')g(y^{-1})g(y)g(y') = f(x)g(y)f(x')g(y')

which shows that (x,y)→f(x)g(y)(x, y) \to f(x)g(y) is indeed a homomorphism of S into G satisfying the conditions of 2).

Corollary

The homomorphism h defined in 2) of Proposition 27 is injective if and only if f and g are injective and f(N)∩g(L)={e}f(N) \cap g(L) = \{e\}; and h is surjective if and only if f(N)g(L)=Gf(N)g(L) = G.

Since h(x,y)=f(x)g(y)h(x, y) = f(x)g(y), the second assertion is obvious; moreover it follows from (4) that f(N)g(L)=g(L)f(N)f(N)g(L) = g(L)f(N), and the first assertion follows from the remarks at the beginning of this sub-section.

The group S defined in Proposition 27 is said to be the external semi-direct product of N and L (relative to σ\sigma); we shall generally identify N (resp. L) with the normal subgroup j1(N)j_1(N) [resp. the subgroup j2(L)j_2(L)] of S. If σy\sigma_y is the identity element of Γ\Gamma for all y∈Ly \in L, we retrieve the usual notion of the product of two groups.

Now let G be a group, and let L and N be two subgroups of G such that LN = NL and such that N is normal in NL, so that for each y∈Ly \in L, σy:x→yxy−1\sigma_y : x \to yxy^{-1} is an automorphism of N, and y→σyy \to \sigma_y is a homomorphism of L into the automorphism group Γ\Gamma of N. It follows then from Proposition 27 that if S is the external semi-direct product of N and L (relative to σ\sigma), then h:(x,y)→xyh : (x, y) \to xy is a homomorphism of S into G. h is bijective if and only if we have N∩L={e}N \cap L = \{e\} and NL=GNL = G (Corollary to Proposition 27); G is then said to be the semi-direct product of its normal subgroup N and its subgroup L, and we often identify G with S by means of h.

Proposition 28

Let L, N be two topological groups, let y→σyy \to \sigma_y be a homomorphism of L into the group of automorphisms Γ\Gamma of the (non-topological) group structure of N; and suppose that the mapping (x,y)→σy(x)(x, y) \to \sigma_y(x) of N×LN \times L into N is continuous. Then:

1) *On the external semi-direct product S of N and L, relative to σ\sigma, the product of the topologies of N and L is compatible with the group structure; the canonical injections j1:N→Sj_1 : N \to S and j2:L→Sj_2 : L \to S are isomorphisms of the topological groups N and L respectively onto the subgroups j1(N)j_1(N) and j2(L)j_2(L) of S, and pr2pr_2 is a strict morphism of S onto L.

2) Let f:N→Gf : N \to G and g:L→Gg : L \to G be two continuous homomorphisms into a topological group G, satisfying (4); then the homomorphism

(x,y)→f(x)g(y) (x, y) \to f(x)g(y)

of S into G is continuous.

This is an immediate consequence of the definitions and of the properties of the product topology.

The topological group S thus defined is said to be the external topological semi-direct product of N and L (relative to σ); notice that the condition imposed on σ implies that L operates continuously on the left on N according to the external law (x,y)→σy(x)(x, y) \to \sigma_y(x) [no. 4].

Now let G be a topological group and let N and L be two subgroups of G such that G is the semi-direct product of N and L, qua non-topological group; it is then clear that the mapping (x,y)→σy(x)(x, y) \to \sigma_y(x) is continuous on N×LN \times L, and that the canonical bijective homomorphism

h:(x,y)→xy h : (x, y) \to xy

of S onto G is continuous. But this homomorphism is not necessarily bicontinuous; when it is bicontinuous, G is said to be the topological semi-direct product of N and L. For this to be so it is necessary and sufficient that, if p:G→Np : G \to N and q:G→Lq : G \to L are the mappings which make correspond to z∈Gz \in G the unique elements p(z)∈Np(z) \in N and q(z)∈Lq(z) \in L such that z=p(z)q(z)z = p(z)q(z), then one of the mappings p,qp, q is continuous (in which case both are continuous). It comes to the same thing to say that the restriction to L of the canonical mapping G→G/NG \to G/N is an isomorphism of the topological group L onto the topological group G/N.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 2.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.