1. Definition of real numbers
1. The ordered group of rational numbers
We have defined the ordering on the set of rational numbers; we have seen that this ordering makes a linearly ordered set, and that it is compatible with the additive group structure of , i.e. for each the relation is equivalent to (that is, the ordering is invariant under translations). We recall the notation (which is used in any linearly ordered group)
is called the absolute value of , and we have
and the triangle inequality
(1)
The relations (resp. ) are equivalent. The relation is equivalent to ; if , the relation is equivalent to , and the relation is equivalent to " or ". For all in , we have
(4)
and, as particular cases,
(6)
Finally, let denote the set of rational numbers ; we have then
(8)
The relation is equivalent to .
We shall use this ordering to define a topology on compatible with its additive group structure.
2. The rational line
Consider the set of symmetric open intervals , where runs through the set of rational numbers ; we shall show that is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of in a topology compatible with the additive group structure of .
The group is commutative, and axiom is clearly satisfied; it is therefore enough to show that axiom is also satisfied, in other words, that for each there exists such that the conditions and together imply . The triangle inequality shows that we may take .
Definition 1
The rational line is the topological space consisting of the set together with the additive group topology for which the symmetric open intervals form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of .
The topological group thus defined is called the additive group of the rational line.
If is any rational number , there is an integer such that ; hence the open intervals form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of on the rational line.
We obtain a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of any point by taking the open intervals , where runs through the set of rational numbers (or the set of numbers ).
Definition 1 is therefore equivalent to that given in Chapter I, § 1, no. 2.
For each pair of rational numbers such that , there exists such that [for example ]; it follows that the rational line is a non-discrete Hausdorff space.
For each , let be the set of pairs in such that . As runs through the set of rational numbers (or just the set of numbers ), the sets form a fundamental system of entourages of the uniformity of the additive group of the rational line. Relations (2) and (3) show that and are uniformly continuous on . It follows that the functions and are uniformly continuous on .
3. The real line and real numbers
Definition 2
Let denote the topological group which is the completion of the additive group of the rational line. The elements of are called real numbers; as a topological space, is called the real line; as a topological group, is called the additive group of the real line.
We shall always identify with the dense subgroup of to which it is canonically isomorphic. With this convention, every rational number is a real number. Every real number which is not rational is said to be irrational; we have seen in Chapter II, § 3, no. 3 that such numbers exist (we shall show this in another way in § 3, no. 3 of this chapter; see also Exercise 2 to § 2); hence (Chapter III, § 2, no. 1) the set of irrational numbers is dense in .
We shall show that the order structure of can be extended to in such a way that the extended ordering is still compatible with the additive group structure of :
Proposition 1
The relation is an ordering on which makes into a linearly ordered set; is compatible with the additive group structure on , and induces the ordering on .
We begin by showing that the relations and imply . Indeed, the function is continuous on , and therefore by (8) we have (Chapter I, § 2, no. 1, Theorem 1). Next, we shall show that the relations and imply ; this will establish that is an ordering on . It is enough to show that . Now the functions and are uniformly continuous on and can therefore be extended by continuity to (Chapter II, , no. 6, Theorem 2); let and be their respective extensions. By extension we have for all ; if then , and since is the closure of by the continuity of , it follows that if then . Hence if we have and therefore
By (10), we have , and hence is linearly ordered by the ordering .
Furthermore, since the relations and are equivalent, the ordering is compatible with the additive group structure of .
Finally, if and belong to the relations and are equivalent, and therefore the relation induces the relation on . This completes the proof.
The relation is again denoted by . The set is the set of all in and is denoted by ; it is a closed set. The set of all is denoted by ; it is the complement of and is therefore open in .
4. Properties of intervals in
Proposition 2
Every closed (resp. open) interval in is a closed (resp. open) set in .
The sets and are obtained by translation from and respectively and are therefore closed (Chapter III, § 1, no. 1); the sets and which are their complements, are open; finally, the closed interval (resp. the open interval ) is the intersection of and (resp. of and ) and is therefore a closed (resp. open) set.
The closed intervals () in are therefore neighbourhoods of 0. Let us show that they form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 as runs through . For this it is enough to establish the following proposition:
Proposition 3
As runs through the set of rational numbers , the intervals in form a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0.
By Proposition 7 of Chapter III, § 3, no. 4 we obtain a fundamental system of neighbourhoods of 0 in by taking the closures in of the intervals
S_r \cap \mathbf{Q} = [-r, +r] \textit{of} \mathbf{Q}. The proof will be complete if we show that S_r is the closure of S_r \cap \mathbf{Q}. Now S_r is closed in \mathbf{R}, and we need therefore only prove that, if x is a real number such that -r < x < r, then x is in the closure of S_r \cap \mathbf{Q}. The interval ]-r, +r[ is an open set in \mathbf{R} and therefore for all sufficiently small neighbourhoods V of o in \mathbf{R} we have x + V \subset ]-r, +r[; but \mathbf{Q} being dense in \mathbf{R}, there is a rational number r' \in x + V, so that -r < r' < r and therefore r' \in S_r \cap \mathbf{Q}.
Corollary
Every point of the real line has a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods.
Proposition 4
If (x, y) is any pair of real numbers such that x < y, there is a rational number r such that x < r < y.
Since \mathbf{Q} is dense in \mathbf{R}, it is enough to show that ]x, y[ is not empty; by translation we may assume x = 0 and y > 0. Now \mathbf{R} is a Hausdorff space and therefore, by Proposition 3, there is a rational number r > 0 such that y \notin ]-r, +r[, and this implies that 0 < r < y.
Proposition 5
Let I be any interval in \mathbf{R}. Then the topology induced on I by the topology of \mathbf{R} is generated by the open intervals of I (where I is considered as linearly ordered by the relation x \leq y).
Every open interval of I is the trace on I of an open interval of \mathbf{R}. This is clear for a bounded interval, and the unbounded interval ]a, \to[ of I is the trace of the unbounded interval ]a, \to[ of \mathbf{R}. We may therefore restrict ourselves to the case I = \mathbf{R}; but in this case the result follows from Proposition 3, since every neighbourhood of a point x \in \mathbf{R} contains an open interval ]x - a, x + a[.
Remark
If A is a dense subset of \mathbf{R}, the topology of \mathbf{R} is generated by the open intervals whose end-points belong to A. For if
is an open interval containing x, there exist two points y, z of A such that x - a < y < x and x < z < x + a; hence ]y, z[ contains x and is contained in ]x - a, x + a[. This proof shows, moreover, that the intervals under consideration form a base (Chapter I, § 1, no. 3) of the topology of \mathbf{R}. In particular, if we take A = \mathbf{Q}, we see that the topology of \mathbf{R} has a countable base.
5. Length of an interval
Definition 3
The length of a bounded interval with end-points a and b (a \leq b) is defined to be b - a.
Every bounded interval which contains more than one point therefore has length > 0. If , the four intervals and all have the same length. An interval with end-points and has the same length as an interval with end-points and ; in other words, the length of an interval is invariant under translation.
If we have . Hence if a bounded interval is contained in a bounded interval , the length of is less than or equal to the length of .
If mutually disjoint open intervals are contained in the interval () it is easily seen by induction on that, if , there is a permutation of the indices () such that for . It follows immediately that the sum of the lengths of the intervals is at most equal to the length of , and that equality holds if and only if and for .
6. Additive uniformity of
Since the group is linearly ordered, the functions and are defined on in the same way as on and satisfy all the relations listed above for , notably relations (1) to (7). Let be a real number > 0 and let be the set of all pairs such that ; as runs through the set of real numbers > 0 (or the set of numbers ), the sets form a fundamental system of entourages of the uniformity of the additive group of the real line (called the additive uniformity of the real line).
The functions , and are uniformly continuous on , and the functions and are uniformly continuous on ; these functions therefore coincide with those obtained by extending by continuity the corresponding functions defined on and , respectively.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 1.