Bourbaki

Exercise 3, § 1

General Topology, IV, 379

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

Let GG be a lattice-ordered commutative group, and let MM be the semigroup of major subsets of GG. Every subset of MM which is bounded above (resp. below) has a least upper bound (resp. greatest lower bound), and GG can be canonically identified with a subset of MM. Let G′G' denote the largest subgroup of MM (the set of all symmetrizable elements of MM).

a) Consider a topology T\mathfrak{T} on GG defined by the process of Exercise 2 a); let VαV_\alpha be the set of all pairs (z,z′)(z, z') in M×MM \times M such that

z−cα⩽z′⩽z+cα; z - c_\alpha \leqslant z' \leqslant z + c_\alpha;

show that the VαV_\alpha form a fundamental system of entourages of a uniformity U\mathfrak{U} on MM, and that the topology T′\mathfrak{T}' induced by U\mathfrak{U} induces T\mathfrak{T} on GG. If T\mathfrak{T} is Hausdorff, then U\mathfrak{U} is a Hausdorff uniformity (remark that the elements of MM, considered as subsets of GG, are then closed), and the uniform space MM thus defined is complete. Show that the mapping (z,z′)→z+z′(z, z') \to z + z' of M×MM \times M into MM is uniformly continuous. Supposing that T\mathfrak{T} is Hausdorff, show that in MM the set of upper (resp. lower) bounds of any subset of MM is closed with respect to T′\mathfrak{T}' (prove this first for the set of upper or lower bounds of an element of MM, by considering the elements of MM as subsets of DD), and that the mapping

(z,z′)→inf⁡(z,z′) (z, z') \to \inf (z, z')

of M×MM \times M into MM is uniformly continuous (same method).

b) Suppose from now on in this exercise that T\mathfrak{T} is Hausdorff. Then the closure G‾\overline{G} of GG in MM is a lattice-ordered group which is complete in the topology induced by T′\mathfrak{T}'. The group G′G' is closed in MM (remark that its closure is a subgroup of MM) and the topology induced by T′\mathfrak{T}' on G′G' is compatible with the ordered group structure of G′G'. For G′G' to be equal to G‾\overline{G} it is sufficient that every non-empty open interval ]a,b[]a, b[ in G′G' should contain an element of GG, and this is always the case if GG is linearly ordered. In this case the topology induced on G′G' by T′\mathfrak{T}' is T0(G′)\mathfrak{T}_0(G').

c) Take GG to be the ordered group Q2Q^2, the product of the linearly ordered group QQ by itself; then G′=M=R2G' = M = R^2 with the product ordering. Show that there are only three distinct non-discrete Hausdorff topologies on GG defined by the procedure of Exercise 2 a), and that they are obtained by taking the set of elements cαc_\alpha to be either the set of pairs (x,y)(x, y) such that x>0x > 0 and y>0y > 0, or the set of pairs (x,0)(x, 0) such that x>0x > 0, or the set of pairs (0,y)(0, y) such that y>0y > 0. For the first of these three topologies we have G‾=G′\overline{G} = G', although there are non-empty open intervals of G′G' which contain no element of GG; for the other two topologies, we have G‾≠G′\overline{G} \neq G'. For each of these three topologies, the set of elements z>0z > 0 in GG is not open.

d) Take GG to be the group Q2Q^2 endowed with the lexicographic order (Set Theory, Chapter III, § 2, no. 6); GG is a non-Archimedean linearly ordered group. Then G‾=G′≠M\overline{G} = G' \neq M; MM is linearly ordered but the topology T′\mathfrak{T}' on MM is distinct from the topology T0(M)\mathfrak{T}_0(M); G′G' is isomorphic to the group R×QR \times Q with the lexicographic order; in G′G' the subgroup H=R×{0}H = R \times \{0\} is open and isolated, but on the quotient group G′/HG'/H the quotient topology is distinct from T0(G′/H)\mathfrak{T}_0(G'/H).

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.