Bourbaki

3. Real projective spaces

In this section we shall need to invoke constantly the notions and results on quotient spaces (Chapter I, § 3), and in particular the following two properties, which for convenience we state as lemmas:

Let EE be a topological space, RR an equivalence relation on EE, AA a subset of EE, RAR_A the equivalence relation induced on AA by RR and let ff be the canonical mapping of EE onto E/RE/R. Then:

Lemma 1

If every open (resp. closed) set in AA which is saturated with respect to RAR_A is the trace on AA of an open (resp. closed) set in EE which is saturated with respect to RR, then the quotient space A/RAA/R_A is homeomorphic to the subspace f(A)f(A) of E/RE/R. This is so in particular if AA is open or closed in EE and saturated with respect to RR.

This follows from Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6.

Lemma 2

If there is a continuous mapping* g of E onto A such that, for all x ∈ E, g(x) belongs to the equivalence class of x, then the quotient space A/R_A is homeomorphic to E/R.

This is Corollary 2 of Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6.

1. Topology of real projective spaces

We recall the following definitions from algebra: given a division ring or a field K, the set of lines passing through o (i.e. vector subspaces of dimension 1) in the left vector space K_s^{n+1} over K is called left projective space of n dimensions over K, and is denoted by P_n(K).

If we make correspond to every line passing through o in K_s^{n+1} the same line with the origin omitted, we have a bijection of P_n(K) onto the quotient of K_{n+1}^* (the complement of {o} in K_s^{n+1}) by the following equivalence relation Δ_n(K) between vectors x and y of K_{n+1}^*: "there exists t ∈ K such that t ≠ o and y = tx". In what follows we shall identify P_n(K) with this quotient set. In the theory of projective spaces, we take the interval [0, n] of N as index set for the coordinates of a point of K_{n+1}^*. The coordinates x_i (0 ≤ i ≤ n) of any one of the points of K_{n+1}^* whose canonical image is x ∈ P_n(K) constitute what is called a system of homogeneous coordinates of the point x.

For each integer p such that −1 ≤ p ≤ n, the canonical image in P_n(K) of a vector subspace of p + 1 dimensions (without the origin) of K_s^{n+1} is called a projective linear variety of p dimensions. A system of p points of P_n(K) is said to be free if it consists of the canonical images of p points of K_{n+1}^* which form a free system in the vector space K_s^{n+1}. The projective linear variety of P_n(K) generated by a free system of p + 1 points (i.e. the smallest projective linear variety which contains these p + 1 points) has dimension p.

When K is the field R, the corresponding projective spaces can be topologized, and it is these we shall study.

Definition 1

The projective space* P_n(R) endowed with the quotient topology of the topology of R_{n+1}^* by the equivalence relation Δ_n(R) *is called real projective space of n dimensions.

The projective space P_1(R) is called the real projective line, and P_2(R) is called the real projective plane.

Whenever there is no risk of confusion, we shall write P_n and Δ_n instead of P_n(R) and Δ_n(R).

Proposition 1

The projective space PnP_n is Hausdorff.

We start by showing that the relation Δn\Delta_n is open (Chapter I, § 5, no. 2). Let AA be an open set in Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^*; to saturate AA with respect to Δn\Delta_n we have to take the union of the sets tAtA homothetic to AA, as tt runs through the set of real numbers ≠0\neq 0; since each of these sets is open, so is their union.

By Proposition 8 of Chapter I, § 8, no. 3, the proposition will be proved if we show that the subset MM of Rn+1∗×Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* \times \mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* defined by the relation Δn\Delta_n is closed. Let then (x,y)(x, y) be a point of Rn+1∗×Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* \times \mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* lying in the closure of MM. If x=(xi)x = (x_i), there is an index ii such that xi≠0x_i \neq 0; hence there is a neighbourhood VV of (x,y)(x, y) such that for every point (x′,y′)∈M∩V(x', y') \in M \cap V the ith coordinate xi′x'_i of x′x' is not 0. As (x′,y′)(x', y') tends to (x,y)(x, y) while remaining in MM, yi′x′i−1y'_i {x'}^{-1}_i tends to t=yixi−1t = y_i x_i^{-1}; since y′=(yi′x′i−1)x′y' = (y'_i {x'}^{-1}_i) x', we see by passing to the limit that y=xy = x, which shows that (x,y)∈M(x, y) \in M.

Proposition 2

The projective space PnP_n is compact and connected, and is homeomorphic to the quotient of the sphere SnS_n by the equivalence relation induced on the sphere by Δn\Delta_n.

Let Δn′\Delta'_n be the equivalence relation induced on SnS_n by Δn\Delta_n (the equivalence classes of Δn′\Delta'_n are pairs of diametrically opposite points of SnS_n). The mapping x→x/∣∣x∣∣x \to x/||x|| of Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* onto SnS_n is continuous, hence (Lemma 2) PnP_n is homeomorphic to Sn/Δn′S_n / \Delta'_n. Since SnS_n is compact and connected, every Hausdorff quotient space of SnS_n is also compact and connected (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1; § 11, no. 3, Proposition 7).

Proposition 3

If n≥0n \geq 0, the projective space PnP_n is homeomorphic to the quotient space of the ball BnB_n obtained by identifying each point of Sn−1S_{n-1} with its diametrically opposite point.

Let HH be the closed hemisphere of SnS_n defined by x0≤0x_0 \leq 0. PnP_n, which is homeomorphic to the quotient space of SnS_n by the relation Δn′\Delta'_n, is also homeomorphic to the quotient of the subset HH of SnS_n by the relation Δn′′\Delta''_n induced on HH by Δn′\Delta'_n. For every equivalence class of Δn′\Delta'_n meets HH in at least one point, and therefore (Lemma 1) it is enough to verify that if we saturate with respect to Δn′\Delta'_n an open subset UU of HH which is saturated with respect to Vn′′V''_n, we get an open subset VV of SnS_n. Now if a=(ai)∈Ua = (a_i) \in U and if a0<0a_0 < 0, there is a neighbourhood WW of aa in SnS_n contained in UU, and the union of WW and −W-W is a neighbourhood of aa saturated with respect to Δn′\Delta'_n and contained in VV. If on the other hand a0=0a_0 = 0, we have −a∈U-a \in U, and there exists r>0r > 0 such that the set of points x∈Hx \in H which satisfy one or the other of the relations ||x - a|| < r, ||x + a|| < r is contained in U; the set of points x \in S_n which satisfy one or the other of these relations is the neighbourhood of a which is saturated with respect to Δn′\Delta'_n and is contained in V.

Observe that the quotient space H/Δn′′H / \Delta''_n is obtained by identifying, in H, each point of the intersection Sn−1S_{n-1} of H and the hyperplane x0=0x_0 = 0 with its opposite point. To complete the proof it suffices to remark that the stereographic projection with vertex e0e_0 (§\S 2, no. 4) is a homeomorphism of H onto BnB_n which leaves invariant the points of Sn−1S_{n-1}.

2. Projective linear varieties

Every injective linear mapping ff of Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} into Rm+1\mathbf{R}^{m+1} (m≥nm \geq n) defines, by restriction to Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* and then by passage to the quotient with respect to the relations Δn\Delta_n and Δm\Delta_m (Set Theory, R, §\S 5, no 8), an injective mapping g of PnP_n into PmP_m, called a projective linear mapping. If φ\varphi (resp. ψ\psi) is the canonical mapping of Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* onto PnP_n (resp. Rm+1∗\mathbf{R}_{m+1}^* onto PmP_m), we have g∘φ=ψ∘fg \circ \varphi = \psi \circ f, which shows that g is continuous on PnP_n (Chapter I, §\S 3, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 6). In particular, every projective linear transformation of PnP_n (i.e. projective linear mapping of PnP_n onto itself) is a homeomorphism of PnP_n onto itself.

We recall also that, if V and V' are two projective linear varieties of p dimensions in PnP_n, there exists a projective linear transformation of PnP_n which transforms V into V'. In particular, if p≥0p \geq 0, there exists a projective linear transformation which transforms V into a coordinate projective linear variety, that is to say the canonical image of a coordinate variety W' of p+1p + 1 dimensions (without the point o) of Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1}. If we identify W' with Rp+1∗\mathbf{R}_{p+1}^*, the relation induced by Δn\Delta_n on W' is precisely Δp\Delta_p; since W' is closed and saturated with respect to Δn\Delta_n, Lemma 1 shows that V' is homeomorphic to PpP_p and is closed in PnP_n; moreover, if p<np < n, its complement is dense in PnP_n (§\S 1, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 3). Hence:

Proposition 4

Every projective linear variety of p dimensions in a projective space PnP_n is closed in PnP_n and homeomorphic to PpP_p; if p<np < n its complement is dense in PnP_n.

!Diagram showing a hyperplane H in projective space P_n, with points x_0^{-1}x, x, and o, and another plane B.

Figure 4.

homogeneous coordinates satisfy a relation of the form ∑i=0naixi=0\sum_{i=0}^{n} a_i x_i = 0, where the aia_i are not all zero (the "equation" of the hyperplane).

Proposition 5

In a projective space* Pn\mathbf{P}_n (n≥0n \geq 0), the complement of a projective hyperplane H\mathbf{H} is homeomorphic to Rn\mathbf{R}^n.

By making a projective linear transformation we may assume that H\mathbf{H} is the hyperplane whose equation is x0=0x_0 = 0. The set AA of points x=(xi)x = (x_i) of Rn+1∗\mathbf{R}_{n+1}^* such that x0≠0x_0 \neq 0 is open and saturated with respect to Δn\Delta_n; its canonical image CC in Pn\mathbf{P}_n, which is the complement of H\mathbf{H} in Pn\mathbf{P}_n, is therefore homeomorphic to the quotient of AA by the equivalence relation Θ\Theta induced on AA by Δn\Delta_n (Lemma 1). Let BB be the hyperplane whose equation is x0=1x_0 = 1 in Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1}. To each point x∈Ax \in A let correspond the point x0−1xx_0^{-1} x where the line through 00 and xx cuts BB (Fig. 4); in this way we define a continuous mapping gg of AA onto BB such that g(x)g(x) is the only point of BB congruent to xx modulo Θ\Theta. It follows that BB is homeomorphic to A/ΘA/\Theta (Lemma 2), hence to CC; since BB is homeomorphic to Rn\mathbf{R}^n, the proof is complete.

Corollary

Every point of* Pn\mathbf{P}_n has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to Rn\mathbf{R}^n.

It follows in particular that the real projective spaces are locally connected (this follows also from Chapter I, § II, no. 6, Proposition 12).

3. Embedding real number space in projective space

Proposition 5 of no. 2 shows that if we are given a projective hyperplane H\mathbf{H} in Pn\mathbf{P}_n (n≥0n \geq 0), there is a homeomorphism of Rn\mathbf{R}^n onto the complement CH\mathbf{C}H of this hyperplane. Once H\mathbf{H} has been chosen it is often convenient to identify Rn\mathbf{R}^n and CH\mathbf{C}H by means of the homeomorphism defined in Proposition 5; the projective hyperplane HH is then said to be "at infinity", and so are its points and subsets. Usually one takes HH to be the "coordinate" hyperplane whose equation is x0=0x_0 = 0; and then the point z=(z1)z = (z_1) of Rn\mathbf{R}^n is identified with the point of PnP_n whose homogeneous coordinates are 1,z1,z2,…,zn1, z_1, z_2, \ldots, z_n.

Once this identification has been made, the closure in PnP_n of any affine linear variety VV of pp dimensions in Rn\mathbf{R}^n is a projective linear variety of pp dimensions, not contained in the hyperplane at infinity, and identical with the projective linear variety generated by VV. Conversely, every projective linear variety PP of pp dimensions which is not contained in the hyperplane at infinity has as its trace on Rn\mathbf{R}^n an affine linear variety of pp dimensions, whose closure in PnP_n is PP.

In the particular case n=1n = 1, the hyperplane at infinity is a point; since P1P_1 is compact, it follows from Alexandroff's theorem (Chapter I, § 9, no. 8, Theorem 4) that P1P_1 is homeomorphic to the space R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} obtained by compactifying the locally compact space R\mathbf{R} by the adjunction of a point (the "point at infinity"). By Proposition 4 of § 2, no. 4, we see also that the real projective line P1′RP_1' \mathbf{R} is homeomorphic to the circle S1S_1 and to the torus TT.

On the other hand, if n>1n > 1, Pn(R)P_n(\mathbf{R}) is not homeomorphic to SnS_n, as we shall see later (cf. Exercise 4).

The "point at infinity" of the space R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} is denoted by ∞\infty, with no sign attached. It is important not to confuse R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} with the extended real line R\mathbf{R} defined in Chapter IV, § 4, which has two "points at infinity"; indeed R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} is homeomorphic to the quotient space of R\mathbf{R} obtained by identifying the two points +∞+\infty and −∞-\infty.

4. Application to the extension of real-valued functions

Since R\mathbf{R} can be considered as a subset of R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}}, every mapping of a set EE into R\mathbf{R} (i.e. every real-valued function on EE) can be considered as a mapping of EE into R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}}; in particular, if EE is a subset of a topological space FF and ff is a mapping of EE into R\mathbf{R}, it may happen that at some points of the closure FcF_c of EE, f(x)f(x) tends to the limit ∞\infty as xx tends to one of these points while remaining in EE; we may then extend the function ff by continuity by assigning it the value ∞\infty at these points (Chapter I, § 8, no. 5, Theorem 1).

Consider in particular the case where EE is a subset of Rn\mathbf{R}^n, the space Rn\mathbf{R}^n itself being considered as embedded in projective space PnP_n; if we suppose that the hyperplane at infinity is x0=0x_0 = 0, a real-valued function ff defined on EE may be identified with the mapping

(x0,x1,x2,…,xn)→f(x1x0,x2x0,…,xnx0) (x_0, x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \to f \left( \frac{x_1}{x_0}, \frac{x_2}{x_0}, \ldots, \frac{x_n}{x_0} \right)

of EE into R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}}; from what has been said in the previous paragraph it may be possible to extend this function, not only to some points of Rn\mathbf{R}^n in the closure of EE, but also to some of the "points at infinity" of Pn\mathbf{P}_n in the closure of EE.

Let us show that we obtain in this way, for example, the extension by continuity to the whole of R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} of a rational function of a real variable, already defined in algebra. Let us identify R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} and P1\mathbf{P}_1, every real number x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R} being identified with the point whose homogeneous coordinates are (1,x)(1, x). and the point ∞\infty with the point whose homogeneous coordinates are (0,1)(0, 1). Let u(x,y)u(x, y) be a rational function, uu and vv being two coprime polynomials of degrees mm and nn respectively; if we suppose for example that m≤nm \leq n, and if we put u1(x,y)=xnu(x,y)u_1(x, y) = x^n u(x, y), v1(x,y)=xnv(x,y)v_1(x, y) = x^n v(x, y), the rational function u/vu/v may be considered as the restriction, to the set of real numbers xx such that v(x)≠0v(x) \neq 0, of the mapping (x,y)→(u1(x,y),v1(x,y))(x, y) \to (u_1(x, y), v_1(x, y)). In other words, we extend u/vu/v by continuity, by giving it the value ∞\infty at those points x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R} where v(x)=0v(x) = 0, and by giving it at the point ∞\infty the value 00 if m<nm < n, the value ∞\infty if m>nm > n, and the value of the ratio of the leading coefficients if m=nm = n.

In particular, the function 1/x1/x can be extended to the point 00 by taking the value ∞\infty there, to ∞\infty by taking the value 00 there; this extended function is evidently a homeomorphism of R~\tilde{\mathbf{R}} onto itself. The same is true of the homographic function (ax+b)/(cx+d)(ax + b)/(cx + d) when ad−bc≠0ad - bc \neq 0.

Likewise, if nn is an integer >0> 0, the function xnx^n extends to the point ∞\infty by taking the value ∞\infty there.

On the other hand, it is in general impossible to extend by continuity a rational function of two real variables either to the space P1×P1\mathbf{P}_1 \times \mathbf{P}_1 or to the space P2\mathbf{P}_2 (cf. Exercise 5).

5. Spaces of projective linear varieties

Given a division ring KK, the set Pn,p(K)\mathbf{P}_{n,p}(K) of projective linear varieties of p≥0p \geq 0 dimensions of the left projective space Pn(K)\mathbf{P}_n(K) is clearly in one-to-one correspondence with the set of vector subspaces of p−1p - 1 dimensions of the left vector space Ksp−1K_s^{p-1}. Let Ls−1,s−1(K)L_{s-1,s-1}(K) denote the set of free systems (xi)1≤i≤s−1(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq s-1} of p−1p - 1 vectors of Ksp−1K_s^{p-1}; then the set Pn,p(K)\mathbf{P}_{n,p}(K) is again in one-to-one correspondence with the quotient of Ln+1, p+1(K)L_{n+1,\ p+1}(K) by the equivalence relation Δn, p(K)\Delta_{n,\ p}(K): " (xk)(x^k) and (yk)(y^k) generate the same vector subspace of p+1p + 1 dimensions of Ksn+1K_s^{n+1}". In what follows we shall identify Pn, p(K)P_{n,\ p}(K) with this quotient set. On the other hand, if to each free system (xk)(x_k) of p+1p + 1 vectors of Ksn+1K_s^{n+1} we make correspond the matrix XX of p+1p + 1 rows and n+1n + 1 columns for which xkx_k is the kth row (1≤k≤p+11 \leq k \leq p + 1), we have a one-to-one correspondence between Ln+1, p+1(K)L_{n+1,\ p+1}(K) and the set of all matrices of p+1p + 1 rows and n+1n + 1 columns which are of rank p+1p + 1; we shall identify Ln+1, p+1(K)L_{n+1,\ p+1}(K) with this set of matrices, and the relation Δn, p(K)\Delta_{n,\ p}(K) between two matrices X,YX, Y is then the following: "there exists a non-singular square matrix TT of order p+1p + 1 such that Y=T.XY = T.X".

In what follows we shall take KK to be the field R\mathbf{R}, and we shall omit the letter KK in the notation above. We can define a topology on Pn, pP_{n,\ p} by a process which generalizes the definition of the topology of real projective spaces. Namely, Ln+1, p+1L_{n+1,\ p+1} is contained in the space Mp+1, n+1M_{p+1,\ n+1} of all matrices of p+1p + 1 rows and n+1n + 1 columns with real elements; we endow Ln+1, p+1L_{n+1,\ p+1} with the topology induced by the topology of this matrix space (§ 1\S \ 1, no. 6).

Definition 2

The space Pn, pP_{n,\ p} which is the quotient of the topological space Ln+1, p+1L_{n+1,\ p+1} by the equivalence relation Δn, p\Delta_{n,\ p} is called the space of projective linear varieties of p≥0p \geq 0 dimensions in real projective space PnP_n.

We shall use the following notation: given a matrix XX of p+1p + 1 rows and n+1n + 1 columns, and any strictly increasing sequence

σ=(i1,…,ip+1) \sigma = (i_1, \ldots, i_{p+1})

of p+1p + 1 indices belonging to the interval [0,n][0, n] of N\mathbf{N}, we denote by XσX_\sigma the square submatrix of XX formed by the columns whose indices are i1,i2,…,ip+1i_1, i_2, \ldots, i_{p+1}. We denote by AσA_\sigma the subset of Lp+1, p+1L_{p+1,\ p+1} consisting of these matrices XX such that XσX_\sigma is non-singular. By Proposition 6 of § 1\S \ 1, no. 6, AσA_\sigma is a dense open set in Mp+1, n+1M_{p+1,\ n+1}, and the function X→Xσ−1X \to X_\sigma^{-1} is continuous on AσA_\sigma.

A geometrical interpretation of the set AσA_\sigma is as follows: let EσE_\sigma be the vector subspace of Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} generated by the vectors eie_i of the canonical basis such that i∈σi \in \sigma, and let Eσ′E'_\sigma be the complementary subspace generated by the eie_i such that i∉σi \notin \sigma; then to say that a matrix xx belongs to AσA_\sigma means that the projections on EσE_\sigma of its p+1p + 1 rows of xkx_k form a free system, or again that the vector subspace generated by the xkx_k is a complement of Eσ′E'_\sigma (or that its intersection with Eσ′E'_\sigma consists only of 0).

Proposition 6

The space Pn, pP_{n,\ p} is Hausdorff.

We show first that the relation Δn,p\Delta_{n,p} is open. If UU is an open set in Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1}, to saturate UU with respect to Δn,p\Delta_{n,p} we have to take the union of the images of UU under the mapping X→T.XX \to T.X, where TT runs through the set of non-singular square matrices of order p+1p+1; since each of these mappings is bicontinuous, all these images are open sets and therefore so is their union.

By Proposition 8 of Chapter I, § 8, no. 3, the proof will be complete if we show that the subset NN of Ln+1,p+1×Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1} \times L_{n+1,p+1}, defined by Δn,p\Delta_{n,p}, is closed. Let (X,Y)(X, Y) be a point of the product space which lies in the closure of NN, and let σ\sigma be a sequence of indices such that XσX_\sigma is non-singular: since AσA_\sigma is open, there is a neighbourhood VV of (X,Y)(X, Y) such that, for each pair (X′,Y′)∈N∩V(X', Y') \in N \cap V, the matrix Xσ′X'_\sigma is non-singular; as (X′,Y′)(X', Y') tends to (X,Y)(X, Y) while remaining in NN, the matrix Yσ′Xσ′−1Y'_\sigma {X'_\sigma}^{-1} therefore tends to T=YσXσ−1T = Y_\sigma X_\sigma^{-1}; since we have Y′=(Yσ′Xσ′−1)X′Y' = (Y'_\sigma {X'_\sigma}^{-1}) X', we see by passing to the limit that Y=T.XY = T.X, and the proof is complete.

Proposition 7

The space Pn,pP_{n,p} is compact.

It is enough to show that there is a compact subspace of Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1} which meets every equivalence class mod Δn,p\Delta_{n,p} in at least one point; for Pn,pP_{n,p} is then the image of this subspace under the canonical mapping of Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1} onto Pn,pP_{n,p}, and is therefore compact (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2).

Let Vn+1,p+1V_{n+1,p+1} be the subspace of Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1} whose elements are the systems (xk)(x_k) of p+1p+1 vectors forming an orthonormal Euclidean basis of the vector subspace they generate that is to say such that (xh/xk)=0(x_h/x_k) = 0 whenever h≠kh \neq k, (xh/xk)=1(x_h/x_k) = 1 for 1≤h≤p+11 \leq h \leq p+1. Every vector subspace of p+1p+1 dimensions of Rn+1\mathbf{R}^{n+1} has such a basis and therefore every class mod. Δn,p\Delta_{n,p} meets Vn+1,p+1V_{n+1,p+1}. On the other hand, the matrices X=(xij)X = (x_{ij}) of Vn+1,p+1V_{n+1,p+1} are defined by the relations

∑j=0nxij2=1(1≤i≤p+1), \sum_{j=0}^n x_{ij}^2 = 1 \quad (1 \leq i \leq p+1),
∑j=0nxijxkj=0(i≠k); \sum_{j=0}^n x_{ij} x_{kj} = 0 \quad (i \neq k);

therefore they form a closed set in Mp+1,n+1M_{p+1,n+1}; and since these relations imply that ∣xij∣≤1|x_{ij}| \leq 1 for each pair of indices (i,j)(i, j), this set is bounded and hence compact.

Proposition 8

Pn,pP_{n,p} is connected and locally connected, and every point has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to R(p+1)(n−p)\mathbf{R}^{(p+1)(n-p)}.

For every (strictly increasing) sequence of indices σ\sigma, the set AσA_\sigma is open in Ln+1,p+1L_{n+1,p+1} and saturated with respect to Δn,p\Delta_{n,p}; its canonical image

C_σ in P_{n,p} is therefore an open set homeomorphic to the quotient of A_σ by the equivalence relation Θ_σ induced on A_σ by Δ_{n,p} (Lemma 1).

Let B_σ be the subset of A_σ consisting of matrices X such that X_σ is the unit matrix of order p + 1; the elements of X other than those of X_σ are then arbitrary, and therefore B_σ is homeomorphic to the space R^{(p+1)(n-p)}. To each matrix X ∈ A_σ let us make correspond the matrix Y = X_σ^{-1}X, which belongs to B_σ; then we have defined a continuous mapping g of A_σ onto B_σ, such that g(X) is the only matrix of B_σ congruent to X mod Θ_σ. It follows that B_σ is homeomorphic to A_σ/Θ_σ (Lemma 2), hence to C_σ.

The set C_σ is therefore connected. Since A_σ is dense in L_{n+1,p+1}, C_σ is dense in P_{n,p} and therefore P_{n,p} is also connected (Chapter I, § 11, no. 1, Proposition 1). On the other hand, every point of P_{n,p} belongs to C_σ for at least one sequence of indices σ, and therefore has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to R^{(p+1)(n-p)}.

The matrix Y = g(X) can be interpreted as follows: let us suppose for the sake of simplicity that the sequence σ consists of the p + 1 indices n − p, n − p + 1, ..., n, and let a_{ij} (1 ≤ i ≤ p + 1, 0 ≤ j ≤ n − p − 1) denote the elements of the first n − p columns of y; then the vector subspace of R^{n+1} generated by the rows of x is that defined by the equations

xj=∑i=1p+1aijxn−p+i−1(0≤j≤n−p−1). x_j = \sum_{i=1}^{p+1} a_{ij} x_{n-p+i-1} \quad (0 \leq j \leq n-p-1).

6. Grassmannians

If K is a field and X is any matrix of L_{n+1,p+1}(K), let c_σ(X) denote the determinant of X_σ; in this way, to each matrix X of L_{n+1,p+1}(K) correspond

h=(n+1p+1) h = \binom{n+1}{p+1}

determinants, not all zero (the components of the exterior product of the p + 1 rows of X). If we make correspond to X the point of the projective space P_{n-1}(K) whose homogeneous coordinates are the c_σ(X), we have defined a mapping of L_{n+1,p+1}(K) into P_{n-1}(K), compatible with the relation Δ_{n,p}(K); passing to the quotient, we have therefore a mapping f of P_{n,p}(K) into P_{n-1}(K). The image G_{n,p}(K) of P_{n,p}(K) under this mapping is called the Grassmannian of indices n, p. We recall also that the mapping f is injective, for if X is a matrix such that X_σ is non-singular, the matrix Y = X_σ^{-1}X of B_σ which corresponds to the class of X mod. Δ_{n,p}(K) is the matrix (d_{ij}/c_σ(X)) (1 ≤ i ≤ p + 1, 0 ≤ j ≤ n), where d_{ij} denotes the determinant of the matrix obtained from XσX_{\sigma} by replacing the iith column of XσX_{\sigma} by the jjth column of XX [which implies that dijd_{ij} is, up to sign, equal to one of the cτ(X)c_{\tau}(X)].

When KK is the field R\mathbf{R}, this mapping ff is evidently continuous. The inverse mapping gg is also continuous; for the elements of a matrix belonging to BσB_{\sigma} are rational functions of the homogeneous coordinates of the point of the Grassmannian to which it corresponds; since f(Bσ)=Bσ′f(B_{\sigma}) = B'_{\sigma} is the set of points of Gn,pG_{n,p} whose homogeneous coordinate with index σ\sigma is not 0, it is an open set in Gn,pG_{n,p}; hence gg is continuous at every point of Bσ′B'_{\sigma}, and since every point of Gn,pG_{n,p} belongs to at least one set Bσ′B'_{\sigma}, gg is continuous at every point. Thus:

Proposition 9

The Grassmannian* Gn,pG_{n,p} is homeomorphic to the space Pn,pP_{n,p}.

We recall finally that the Grassmannians Gn,p(K)G_{n,p}(K) and Gn,n−p−1(K)G_{n,n-p-1}(K) are subsets of the same projective space Pn−1(K)P_{n-1}(K) and can be transformed into the other by a projective linear transformation; it follows that Gn,pG_{n,p} and Gn,n−p−1G_{n,n-p-1} are homeomorphic.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 3.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.