3. Real projective spaces
In this section we shall need to invoke constantly the notions and results on quotient spaces (Chapter I, § 3), and in particular the following two properties, which for convenience we state as lemmas:
Let be a topological space, an equivalence relation on , a subset of , the equivalence relation induced on by and let be the canonical mapping of onto . Then:
Lemma 1
If every open (resp. closed) set in which is saturated with respect to is the trace on of an open (resp. closed) set in which is saturated with respect to , then the quotient space is homeomorphic to the subspace of . This is so in particular if is open or closed in and saturated with respect to .
This follows from Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6.
Lemma 2
If there is a continuous mapping* g of E onto A such that, for all x ∈ E, g(x) belongs to the equivalence class of x, then the quotient space A/R_A is homeomorphic to E/R.
This is Corollary 2 of Proposition 10 of Chapter I, § 3, no. 6.
1. Topology of real projective spaces
We recall the following definitions from algebra: given a division ring or a field K, the set of lines passing through o (i.e. vector subspaces of dimension 1) in the left vector space K_s^{n+1} over K is called left projective space of n dimensions over K, and is denoted by P_n(K).
If we make correspond to every line passing through o in K_s^{n+1} the same line with the origin omitted, we have a bijection of P_n(K) onto the quotient of K_{n+1}^* (the complement of {o} in K_s^{n+1}) by the following equivalence relation Δ_n(K) between vectors x and y of K_{n+1}^*: "there exists t ∈ K such that t ≠ o and y = tx". In what follows we shall identify P_n(K) with this quotient set. In the theory of projective spaces, we take the interval [0, n] of N as index set for the coordinates of a point of K_{n+1}^*. The coordinates x_i (0 ≤ i ≤ n) of any one of the points of K_{n+1}^* whose canonical image is x ∈ P_n(K) constitute what is called a system of homogeneous coordinates of the point x.
For each integer p such that −1 ≤ p ≤ n, the canonical image in P_n(K) of a vector subspace of p + 1 dimensions (without the origin) of K_s^{n+1} is called a projective linear variety of p dimensions. A system of p points of P_n(K) is said to be free if it consists of the canonical images of p points of K_{n+1}^* which form a free system in the vector space K_s^{n+1}. The projective linear variety of P_n(K) generated by a free system of p + 1 points (i.e. the smallest projective linear variety which contains these p + 1 points) has dimension p.
When K is the field R, the corresponding projective spaces can be topologized, and it is these we shall study.
Definition 1
The projective space* P_n(R) endowed with the quotient topology of the topology of R_{n+1}^* by the equivalence relation Δ_n(R) *is called real projective space of n dimensions.
The projective space P_1(R) is called the real projective line, and P_2(R) is called the real projective plane.
Whenever there is no risk of confusion, we shall write P_n and Δ_n instead of P_n(R) and Δ_n(R).
Proposition 1
The projective space is Hausdorff.
We start by showing that the relation is open (Chapter I, § 5, no. 2). Let be an open set in ; to saturate with respect to we have to take the union of the sets homothetic to , as runs through the set of real numbers ; since each of these sets is open, so is their union.
By Proposition 8 of Chapter I, § 8, no. 3, the proposition will be proved if we show that the subset of defined by the relation is closed. Let then be a point of lying in the closure of . If , there is an index such that ; hence there is a neighbourhood of such that for every point the ith coordinate of is not 0. As tends to while remaining in , tends to ; since , we see by passing to the limit that , which shows that .
Proposition 2
The projective space is compact and connected, and is homeomorphic to the quotient of the sphere by the equivalence relation induced on the sphere by .
Let be the equivalence relation induced on by (the equivalence classes of are pairs of diametrically opposite points of ). The mapping of onto is continuous, hence (Lemma 2) is homeomorphic to . Since is compact and connected, every Hausdorff quotient space of is also compact and connected (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1; § 11, no. 3, Proposition 7).
Proposition 3
If , the projective space is homeomorphic to the quotient space of the ball obtained by identifying each point of with its diametrically opposite point.
Let be the closed hemisphere of defined by . , which is homeomorphic to the quotient space of by the relation , is also homeomorphic to the quotient of the subset of by the relation induced on by . For every equivalence class of meets in at least one point, and therefore (Lemma 1) it is enough to verify that if we saturate with respect to an open subset of which is saturated with respect to , we get an open subset of . Now if and if , there is a neighbourhood of in contained in , and the union of and is a neighbourhood of saturated with respect to and contained in . If on the other hand , we have , and there exists such that the set of points which satisfy one or the other of the relations ||x - a|| < r, ||x + a|| < r is contained in U; the set of points x \in S_n which satisfy one or the other of these relations is the neighbourhood of a which is saturated with respect to and is contained in V.
Observe that the quotient space is obtained by identifying, in H, each point of the intersection of H and the hyperplane with its opposite point. To complete the proof it suffices to remark that the stereographic projection with vertex ( 2, no. 4) is a homeomorphism of H onto which leaves invariant the points of .
2. Projective linear varieties
Every injective linear mapping of into () defines, by restriction to and then by passage to the quotient with respect to the relations and (Set Theory, R, 5, no 8), an injective mapping g of into , called a projective linear mapping. If (resp. ) is the canonical mapping of onto (resp. onto ), we have , which shows that g is continuous on (Chapter I, 3, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 6). In particular, every projective linear transformation of (i.e. projective linear mapping of onto itself) is a homeomorphism of onto itself.
We recall also that, if V and V' are two projective linear varieties of p dimensions in , there exists a projective linear transformation of which transforms V into V'. In particular, if , there exists a projective linear transformation which transforms V into a coordinate projective linear variety, that is to say the canonical image of a coordinate variety W' of dimensions (without the point o) of . If we identify W' with , the relation induced by on W' is precisely ; since W' is closed and saturated with respect to , Lemma 1 shows that V' is homeomorphic to and is closed in ; moreover, if , its complement is dense in ( 1, no. 4, Corollary to Proposition 3). Hence:
Proposition 4
Every projective linear variety of p dimensions in a projective space is closed in and homeomorphic to ; if its complement is dense in .
Figure 4.
homogeneous coordinates satisfy a relation of the form , where the are not all zero (the "equation" of the hyperplane).
Proposition 5
In a projective space* (), the complement of a projective hyperplane is homeomorphic to .
By making a projective linear transformation we may assume that is the hyperplane whose equation is . The set of points of such that is open and saturated with respect to ; its canonical image in , which is the complement of in , is therefore homeomorphic to the quotient of by the equivalence relation induced on by (Lemma 1). Let be the hyperplane whose equation is in . To each point let correspond the point where the line through and cuts (Fig. 4); in this way we define a continuous mapping of onto such that is the only point of congruent to modulo . It follows that is homeomorphic to (Lemma 2), hence to ; since is homeomorphic to , the proof is complete.
Corollary
Every point of* has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to .
It follows in particular that the real projective spaces are locally connected (this follows also from Chapter I, § II, no. 6, Proposition 12).
3. Embedding real number space in projective space
Proposition 5 of no. 2 shows that if we are given a projective hyperplane in (), there is a homeomorphism of onto the complement of this hyperplane. Once has been chosen it is often convenient to identify and by means of the homeomorphism defined in Proposition 5; the projective hyperplane is then said to be "at infinity", and so are its points and subsets. Usually one takes to be the "coordinate" hyperplane whose equation is ; and then the point of is identified with the point of whose homogeneous coordinates are .
Once this identification has been made, the closure in of any affine linear variety of dimensions in is a projective linear variety of dimensions, not contained in the hyperplane at infinity, and identical with the projective linear variety generated by . Conversely, every projective linear variety of dimensions which is not contained in the hyperplane at infinity has as its trace on an affine linear variety of dimensions, whose closure in is .
In the particular case , the hyperplane at infinity is a point; since is compact, it follows from Alexandroff's theorem (Chapter I, § 9, no. 8, Theorem 4) that is homeomorphic to the space obtained by compactifying the locally compact space by the adjunction of a point (the "point at infinity"). By Proposition 4 of § 2, no. 4, we see also that the real projective line is homeomorphic to the circle and to the torus .
On the other hand, if , is not homeomorphic to , as we shall see later (cf. Exercise 4).
The "point at infinity" of the space is denoted by , with no sign attached. It is important not to confuse with the extended real line defined in Chapter IV, § 4, which has two "points at infinity"; indeed is homeomorphic to the quotient space of obtained by identifying the two points and .
4. Application to the extension of real-valued functions
Since can be considered as a subset of , every mapping of a set into (i.e. every real-valued function on ) can be considered as a mapping of into ; in particular, if is a subset of a topological space and is a mapping of into , it may happen that at some points of the closure of , tends to the limit as tends to one of these points while remaining in ; we may then extend the function by continuity by assigning it the value at these points (Chapter I, § 8, no. 5, Theorem 1).
Consider in particular the case where is a subset of , the space itself being considered as embedded in projective space ; if we suppose that the hyperplane at infinity is , a real-valued function defined on may be identified with the mapping
of into ; from what has been said in the previous paragraph it may be possible to extend this function, not only to some points of in the closure of , but also to some of the "points at infinity" of in the closure of .
Let us show that we obtain in this way, for example, the extension by continuity to the whole of of a rational function of a real variable, already defined in algebra. Let us identify and , every real number being identified with the point whose homogeneous coordinates are . and the point with the point whose homogeneous coordinates are . Let be a rational function, and being two coprime polynomials of degrees and respectively; if we suppose for example that , and if we put , , the rational function may be considered as the restriction, to the set of real numbers such that , of the mapping . In other words, we extend by continuity, by giving it the value at those points where , and by giving it at the point the value if , the value if , and the value of the ratio of the leading coefficients if .
In particular, the function can be extended to the point by taking the value there, to by taking the value there; this extended function is evidently a homeomorphism of onto itself. The same is true of the homographic function when .
Likewise, if is an integer , the function extends to the point by taking the value there.
On the other hand, it is in general impossible to extend by continuity a rational function of two real variables either to the space or to the space (cf. Exercise 5).
5. Spaces of projective linear varieties
Given a division ring , the set of projective linear varieties of dimensions of the left projective space is clearly in one-to-one correspondence with the set of vector subspaces of dimensions of the left vector space . Let denote the set of free systems of vectors of ; then the set is again in one-to-one correspondence with the quotient of by the equivalence relation : " and generate the same vector subspace of dimensions of ". In what follows we shall identify with this quotient set. On the other hand, if to each free system of vectors of we make correspond the matrix of rows and columns for which is the kth row (), we have a one-to-one correspondence between and the set of all matrices of rows and columns which are of rank ; we shall identify with this set of matrices, and the relation between two matrices is then the following: "there exists a non-singular square matrix of order such that ".
In what follows we shall take to be the field , and we shall omit the letter in the notation above. We can define a topology on by a process which generalizes the definition of the topology of real projective spaces. Namely, is contained in the space of all matrices of rows and columns with real elements; we endow with the topology induced by the topology of this matrix space (, no. 6).
Definition 2
The space which is the quotient of the topological space by the equivalence relation is called the space of projective linear varieties of dimensions in real projective space .
We shall use the following notation: given a matrix of rows and columns, and any strictly increasing sequence
of indices belonging to the interval of , we denote by the square submatrix of formed by the columns whose indices are . We denote by the subset of consisting of these matrices such that is non-singular. By Proposition 6 of , no. 6, is a dense open set in , and the function is continuous on .
A geometrical interpretation of the set is as follows: let be the vector subspace of generated by the vectors of the canonical basis such that , and let be the complementary subspace generated by the such that ; then to say that a matrix belongs to means that the projections on of its rows of form a free system, or again that the vector subspace generated by the is a complement of (or that its intersection with consists only of 0).
Proposition 6
The space is Hausdorff.
We show first that the relation is open. If is an open set in , to saturate with respect to we have to take the union of the images of under the mapping , where runs through the set of non-singular square matrices of order ; since each of these mappings is bicontinuous, all these images are open sets and therefore so is their union.
By Proposition 8 of Chapter I, § 8, no. 3, the proof will be complete if we show that the subset of , defined by , is closed. Let be a point of the product space which lies in the closure of , and let be a sequence of indices such that is non-singular: since is open, there is a neighbourhood of such that, for each pair , the matrix is non-singular; as tends to while remaining in , the matrix therefore tends to ; since we have , we see by passing to the limit that , and the proof is complete.
Proposition 7
The space is compact.
It is enough to show that there is a compact subspace of which meets every equivalence class mod in at least one point; for is then the image of this subspace under the canonical mapping of onto , and is therefore compact (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2).
Let be the subspace of whose elements are the systems of vectors forming an orthonormal Euclidean basis of the vector subspace they generate that is to say such that whenever , for . Every vector subspace of dimensions of has such a basis and therefore every class mod. meets . On the other hand, the matrices of are defined by the relations
therefore they form a closed set in ; and since these relations imply that for each pair of indices , this set is bounded and hence compact.
Proposition 8
is connected and locally connected, and every point has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to .
For every (strictly increasing) sequence of indices , the set is open in and saturated with respect to ; its canonical image
C_σ in P_{n,p} is therefore an open set homeomorphic to the quotient of A_σ by the equivalence relation Θ_σ induced on A_σ by Δ_{n,p} (Lemma 1).
Let B_σ be the subset of A_σ consisting of matrices X such that X_σ is the unit matrix of order p + 1; the elements of X other than those of X_σ are then arbitrary, and therefore B_σ is homeomorphic to the space R^{(p+1)(n-p)}. To each matrix X ∈ A_σ let us make correspond the matrix Y = X_σ^{-1}X, which belongs to B_σ; then we have defined a continuous mapping g of A_σ onto B_σ, such that g(X) is the only matrix of B_σ congruent to X mod Θ_σ. It follows that B_σ is homeomorphic to A_σ/Θ_σ (Lemma 2), hence to C_σ.
The set C_σ is therefore connected. Since A_σ is dense in L_{n+1,p+1}, C_σ is dense in P_{n,p} and therefore P_{n,p} is also connected (Chapter I, § 11, no. 1, Proposition 1). On the other hand, every point of P_{n,p} belongs to C_σ for at least one sequence of indices σ, and therefore has an open neighbourhood homeomorphic to R^{(p+1)(n-p)}.
The matrix Y = g(X) can be interpreted as follows: let us suppose for the sake of simplicity that the sequence σ consists of the p + 1 indices n − p, n − p + 1, ..., n, and let a_{ij} (1 ≤ i ≤ p + 1, 0 ≤ j ≤ n − p − 1) denote the elements of the first n − p columns of y; then the vector subspace of R^{n+1} generated by the rows of x is that defined by the equations
6. Grassmannians
If K is a field and X is any matrix of L_{n+1,p+1}(K), let c_σ(X) denote the determinant of X_σ; in this way, to each matrix X of L_{n+1,p+1}(K) correspond
determinants, not all zero (the components of the exterior product of the p + 1 rows of X). If we make correspond to X the point of the projective space P_{n-1}(K) whose homogeneous coordinates are the c_σ(X), we have defined a mapping of L_{n+1,p+1}(K) into P_{n-1}(K), compatible with the relation Δ_{n,p}(K); passing to the quotient, we have therefore a mapping f of P_{n,p}(K) into P_{n-1}(K). The image G_{n,p}(K) of P_{n,p}(K) under this mapping is called the Grassmannian of indices n, p. We recall also that the mapping f is injective, for if X is a matrix such that X_σ is non-singular, the matrix Y = X_σ^{-1}X of B_σ which corresponds to the class of X mod. Δ_{n,p}(K) is the matrix (d_{ij}/c_σ(X)) (1 ≤ i ≤ p + 1, 0 ≤ j ≤ n), where d_{ij} denotes the determinant of the matrix obtained from by replacing the th column of by the th column of [which implies that is, up to sign, equal to one of the ].
When is the field , this mapping is evidently continuous. The inverse mapping is also continuous; for the elements of a matrix belonging to are rational functions of the homogeneous coordinates of the point of the Grassmannian to which it corresponds; since is the set of points of whose homogeneous coordinate with index is not 0, it is an open set in ; hence is continuous at every point of , and since every point of belongs to at least one set , is continuous at every point. Thus:
Proposition 9
The Grassmannian* is homeomorphic to the space .
We recall finally that the Grassmannians and are subsets of the same projective space and can be transformed into the other by a projective linear transformation; it follows that and are homeomorphic.
Exercises
See the exercises for § 3.