3. Special function spaces
1. Spaces of mappings into a metric space
Let be a set, a uniform space, a family of pseudometrics defining the uniform structure of (Chapter IX, § 1, no. 4), and let be a set of subsets of . For each , each set , and each pair of mappings of into , write
it follows immediately that is a pseudometric on and that the family of pseudometrics defines the uniformity of -*convergence* on . In particular:
Proposition 1
If is a metrizable uniform space, the uniformity of uniform convergence on is metrizable.
For if is a metric on compatible with its uniform structure, the structure of uniform convergence on is defined by the single pseudometric
in general this pseudometric is not finite, but it is equivalent to a finite one (Chapter IX, § 1, no. 2), and since the uniformity of uniform convergence is Hausdorff (§ 1, no. 2, Proposition 1), it is metrizable.
Corollary
Let be a topological space and let be a metrizable uniform space. Suppose that there is a sequence of compact subsets of such that every compact subset of is contained in some . Then the uniformity of compact convergence on is metrizable.
Since the cover , is isomorphic to a uniform subspace of (, no. 2, Remark 3), and the corollary therefore follows from Proposition 1 (Chapter IX, § 2, no. 4, Theorem 1, Corollary 2).
Note that this corollary applies in particular if is locally compact and σ-compact (Chapter I, § 9, no. 9, Proposition 15, Corollary 1).
Now let be a metric space and let be its metric. If is any set and any set of subsets of , we shall denote by the set of all mappings such that is bounded for each . Unless the contrary is expressly stated we shall regard as endowed with the uniformity of -convergence, which is defined by the following family of pseudometrics on :
which are finite by hypothesis. When , we write in place of . A mapping is said to be bounded if it belongs to , i.e. if is a bounded subset of .
Proposition 2
Let be a set and a metric space. The set of bounded mappings is both open and closed in the space .
If is bounded, then every mapping such that for all , we have is bounded, because
hence is open. On the other hand, if lies in the closure of in , there is a mapping such that for all ; hence is bounded.
Corollary 1
Let be a set and a metric space. Then is closed in . In particular, if is complete then is complete with respect to the uniformity of -convergence.
For is the inverse image of the subset of the product under the canonical mapping of into ; the first assertion therefore follows from § 1, no. 2, Remark 3, and the second follows from the first, if we take account of Theorem 1 of § 1, no. 5.
Corollary 2
Let X be a topological space and Y a metric space. Then the space of all bounded continuous mappings of X into Y is both open and closed in ; it is complete if Y is complete.
The space in question is ; the first assertion follows from Proposition 2; the second follows from the first (, no. 6, Theorem 2, Corollary 1).
2. Spaces of mappings into a normed space
Consider, more particularly, the situation in which Y is a normed vector space over a non-discrete valued division ring K (Chapter IX, § 3, no. 3). Let us denote by the norm of . The set is then canonically endowed with a K-vector space structure. A mapping is bounded if and only if the real-valued function is bounded in X. If are bounded mappings of X into Y, it is clear that and are bounded; in other words, is a vector subspace of . Moreover, is a norm on ; for it satisfies the triangle inequality and implies , and for each we have
Moreover, it is immediately verified that the uniformity on defined by this norm is the uniformity of uniform convergence. Unless the contrary is expressly stated, whenever is considered as a normed space, it is the norm defined above which is in question.
Proposition 3
If the normed space Y is complete, then every series of bounded mappings of X into Y which is absolutely convergent in the normed space (i.e. which is such that ; cf. Chapter IX, § 3, no. 6) is uniformly convergent in X.
For since is complete (no. 1, Proposition 2, Corollary 1), the result follows from Chapter IX, § 3, no. 6, Proposition 11 and the definition of a uniformly convergent series.
Remark 1
If , then for each ; in other words, for each the series with general term is absolutely convergent in the space . The converse is false. To avoid all confusion we shall sometimes say that the series with general term is normally convergent, meaning that the series with general term is convergent. A series can be uniformly convergent in without being normally convergent; this is the case, for example, for the series in the space , defined as follows: if , otherwise.
When is a normed algebra (Chapter IX, § 3, no. 7) over a non-discrete valued field , then is a -algebra, and the norm is compatible with the algebra structure, since
Proposition 4
Let () and be normed vector spaces over a non-discrete valued division ring , and let . Then the set of all multilinear mappings of into is closed in the space .
This set consists of all which satisfy all the relations
Proposition 5
Under the hypotheses of Proposition 4, the set of continuous multilinear mappings of into is closed in with respect to the topology of bounded convergence; it is complete with respect to the uniformity of bounded convergence if is complete.
For if is the set of all bounded subsets of , is the intersection of the set of all multilinear mappings of into and the set (Chapter IX, § 3, no. 5, Theorem 1); the result thus follows from Proposition 4 and Proposition 2, Corollary 1.
For the remainder of this subsection, denotes a non-discrete valued field.
Then is a vector subspace of . Let be the unit ball in , the set of all such that .
Then the mapping of into is injective; moreover, the inverse image, under this mapping, of the uniformity of uniform convergence on is the uniformity of bounded convergence on . For every bounded subset of is contained in a set of the form (for some ), and if is an element of , to say that for all is equivalent to saying that for all . It is easily verified that the number
Unless the contrary is expressly stated, whenever is considered as a normed space, it is the norm defined above which is in question.
Proposition 6
The multilinear mapping*
This is an immediate consequence of the inequality (2) (Chapter IX, § 3, no. 5, Theorem 1).
Proposition 7
Let* be three normed spaces over . The canonical mapping of the normed space into the space of linear mappings of into which sends each to the mapping is an isometry of onto .
This follows immediately from the definitions and the relation
Proposition 8
Let be three normed spaces over . The bilinear mapping of into is continuous.
For if and we have
In particular, on the set of continuous endomorphisms of a normed space over , the norm is compatible with the -algebra structure of .
Remark 2
The set of linear (necessarily continuous) mappings of into can be identified with the set of matrices with rows and columns with coefficients in and hence can be identified with ; on , the uniformity of bounded convergence (with respect to the Euclidean metric on ), of compact convergence, and of pointwise convergence are then identified with the additive uniformity on . Take the norm of to be
3. Countability properties of spaces of continuous functions
Theorem 1
Let be a compact space. a) If is metrizable and if is any metrizable uniform space of countable type (Chapter IX, § 2, no. 8), then the metrizable space of continuous mappings of into , endowed with the topology of uniform convergence, is of countable type. b) Conversely, if the metrizable space is of countable type, then is metrizable.
a) Let (resp. ) be a metric compatible with the topology of (resp. with the uniformity of ); then is a metric defining the uniformity of uniform convergence on the space , the functions of being bounded because is compact (no. 1). For each pair of integers , let be the set of functions such that the relation implies . Every function is uniformly continuous (Chapter II, § 4, no. 1, Theorem 2) and therefore, for each , is the union of the sets (). Let be a finite subset of such that the open balls with centres and radii cover (); and let be a countable sequence which is dense in . For each mapping , let be the set of those such that for . By the definition of the , is the union of the sets for ; let be the set of mappings such that , and for each let be an element of ; finally, let denote the countable set of for . Let , and let be an element of such that ; then it follows immediately from the definitions that we have for all , i.e. . Hence the union of the sets is dense in , because for every integer and every there exists such that , and we have just seen that the distance from to is .
b) Let . Since is a uniform subspace of , it is of countable type. Let be a sequence which is dense in . Consider the product space and the mapping of into , which is obviously continuous. The mapping is injective; for, by definition of the sequence , the relation for all implies, on passing to the limit, for every function ; but this is impossible if by virtue of Axiom (OIV) applied to the point and to a neighbourhood of which does not contain (Chapter IX, § 1, no. 5, Theorem 2). It follows that the compact space is homeomorphic to the subspace of (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 2); since is metrizable and of countable type, so is and therefore so is .
Q.E.D.
Corollary
Let be a locally compact space whose topology admits a countable base, and let be a metrizable uniform space of countable type.
a) The space of continuous mappings of into which have a limit at infinity, endowed with the topology of uniform convergence in , is a metrizable space of countable type.
b) The space of continuous mappings of into , endowed with the topology of compact convergence, is a metrizable space of countable type.
a) Let be the compact space obtained by adjoining a point at infinity to (Chapter I, § 9, no. 8, Theorem 4); by definition, every function can be uniquely extended to a continuous function , and is therefore a bijection of L onto ; and this bijection is a homeomorphism of the space L onto by Proposition 6 of § 1, no. 6. Since is metrizable (Chapter IX, § 2, no. 9, Proposition 16, Corollary) the result follows from Theorem 1, applied to and Y.
b) Let be a covering of X by relatively compact open sets, such that every compact subset of X is contained in some (Chapter I, § 9, no. 9, Proposition 15, Corollary 1). If is the set of the , the topology of compact convergence on is the same as the topology of -convergence. Consequently ( no. 2, Remark 3) the space is homeomorphic to a subspace of the product ; since each of the compact spaces has a countable base, it is metrizable (Chapter IX, § 2, no. 9, Proposition 16); each of the is therefore metrizable and of countable type by Theorem 1, and hence so is .
Note that the space of all bounded continuous real-valued functions on , endowed with the topology of uniform convergence, is not of countable type (Exercise 4).
4. The compact-open topology
Theorem 2
Let X be a topological space, Y a uniform space. For each compact subset K of X and each open subset U of Y, let T(K, U) denote the set of all continuous mappings such that . Then the sets generate the topology of compact convergence on .
Let be the Hausdorff uniform space associated with Y (Chapter II, § 3, no. 8) and let be the canonical mapping of Y onto . The topology of compact convergence is the coarsest topology for which the mappings of into are continuous, as K runs through the set of all compact subsets of X ( no. 4, Proposition 4). Hence we obtain a subbase of the topology of by taking a subbase of the topology of for each compact subset K of X and then taking the union [in ] of the inverse images of these subbases in . On the other hand, every open subset of Y is of the form , where is open in (Chapter II, § 3, no. 7, Proposition 12); hence, for each compact subset , is the inverse image of under the mapping
It thus remains for us to prove the theorem when X is compact and Y is Hausdorff; we shall make these assumptions from now on.
Let us first show that is open in . Let be a point of this set; since is compact (Chapter I, § 9, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 1) and contained in the open set , there exists a symmetric entourage of such that (Chapter II, § 4, no. 3, Proposition 4, Corollary). Let be the neighbourhood of in consisting of all continuous mappings such that for all . For such mappings we clearly have ; hence and therefore , which proves our assertion.
Conversely, if is a neighbourhood of a point , let us show that contains the intersection of a finite number of neighbourhoods of the form . We may suppose that is the set of all such that for all , being a given entourage of . Since is continuous on , it is uniformly continuous (Chapter II, § 4, no. 1, Theorem 2). Let be a symmetric entourage of , open in and such that . can be covered by a finite number of compact sets () such that each is -small (). Let be the open set , and let be a continuous mapping contained in the intersection of the sets (which are neighbourhoods of ). Then, for every , belongs to and therefore and are -close, hence -close. Since each belongs to some , we have and the proof is complete.
This result leads us to make the following definition:
Definition 1
Let be two topological spaces, not necessarily uniformizable. For each compact subset of and each open subset of , let be the set of all such that . The topology on generated by the sets is called the topology of compact convergence or the compact-open topology; and we denote by the topological space obtained by endowing with this topology.
If is a uniform space it follows from Theorem 2 that this definition agrees with that given in § 1, no. 3.
If is a subset of we shall say that the topology induced on by that of is the compact-open topology on .
Example
Let be the interval in . If is any topological space, the space is called the space of paths in . For each , the subspace of consisting of paths such that is called the space of loops (in ) at the point .
Remark 1
Likewise, the topology induced on by the product topology on is called the topology of pointwise convergence ( being not necessarily uniformizable); it is generated by sets of the form as runs through and runs through the set of all open subsets of , and it is therefore coarser than the compact-open topology. We deduce that, if is Hausdorff, the space is Hausdorff (Chapter I, § 8, no. 1, Proposition 5, Corollary).
Remark 2
Let be a subbase of the topology of , and let be a set of compact subsets of with the following property:
(R) If is any compact subset of and is any neighbourhood of , there exists a finite number of sets such that .
Then the sets , where and , form a subbase for the compact-open topology on . To prove this, we have to show that if is any compact subset of and any open subset of , and if , then there exists a finite number of pairs such that , and . Note first that for every finite sequence of sets of and every compact subset of , we have by definition. We may therefore first of all replace by the set of finite intersections of sets of , i.e. we may suppose that is a base of the topology of . By hypothesis, is quasi-compact and contained in , hence there exists a finite number of sets contained in which cover .
The sets are open in and cover . For each there is therefore a compact neighbourhood of in , contained in some one of the . We can cover with a finite number of these sets ; for each , let us denote by one of the indices such that . This being so, for each index there exists [by (R)] a finite number of sets , belonging to , which cover . For each we have and therefore , and ; thus our assertion is proved.
Theorem 3
Let be three topological spaces and let be a mapping of into . If is continuous then is a continuous mapping of into . The converse is true if is locally compact.
Suppose that is continuous. To show that is continuous we have to prove that, for each compact subset of and each open subset of , the inverse image of under is open in . Let ; for each , we have , and since is continuous there is a neighbourhood of in and a neighbourhood of in such that . Since is compact, there exists a finite number of points such that the sets cover . Let be the intersection of the neighbourhoods of , which is a neighbourhood of ; if and , we have , since is contained in some one of the and is contained in each ; hence , and therefore is a neighbourhood of each of its points and consequently is open in .
Conversely, suppose that is continuous and that is locally compact, and let us show that is continuous. Let , let and let be an open neighbourhood of in ; we shall show that there is a neighbourhood of in and a neighbourhood of in such that . Since is continuous, there is a compact neighbourhood of such that . On the other hand, since is continuous, the set of such that [i.e. such that for all ] is an open subset of and therefore a neighbourhood of ; and we have .
Q.E.D.
Corollary 1
Let be a locally compact space, a topological space, a subset of . Then the compact-open topology on is the coarsest for which the mapping of into is continuous.
For, by Theorem 3, this mapping is continuous if and only if the canonical injection is continuous.
Remark 3
Let be a locally compact space and a Hausdorff topological space. If is a topology on a subset of such that the mapping is continuous on and if also is compact with respect to , then is the compact-open topology. For it is finer than the latter by Corollary 1, and since the compact-open topology is Hausdorff, the two topologies are identical. Note that if in addition is completely regular, then is equicontinuous with respect to every uniformity compatible with the topology of (§ 2, no. 5, Theorem 2, Corollary 3), and for every compact subset of the set
is compact, since it is the image of under the continuous mapping .
Corollary 2
Let be three topological spaces such that is Hausdorff and is locally compact. Then the restriction to of the canonical bijection (Set Theory, R, § 4, no. 14) is a homeomorphism of onto .
This restriction is certainly a bijection
by Theorem 3; it remains therefore to be shown that the compact-open topology on is the inverse image under of the compact-open topology on . Since the sets , where is a compact subset of and is an open subset of , form a subbase of the topology of , it follows from Remark 2 that the topology of is generated by the sets of the form , where and are as above and is a compact subset of . Now the image of under is precisely , and is therefore an open set; so we have shown that is continuous. To prove that is a homeomorphism, we note first that the sets of the form in (where is a compact subset of , and is a compact subset of ) satisfy the condition (R) of Remark 2: for if is a compact subset of and is a neighbourhood of in , the projections , are compact, since and are Hausdorff and is a neighbourhood of in the compact space , so that every point of has a neighbourhood in of the form , where and are compact; since can be covered by a finite number of these neighbourhoods, the assertion is proved. Therefore sets of the form , where is a compact subset of , a compact subset of and an open subset of , generate the topology of . But we have already seen that the image of under is the open set in ; hence is a homeomorphism.
Note that if in addition is assumed to be uniformizable, Corollary 2 is a trivial consequence of § 1, no. 4, Proposition 2.
Proposition 9
Let be three topological spaces, being locally compact. Then the mapping of into is continuous.
We have to show that, for every compact subset of and every open subset of , the set of pairs such that is open in . Let ; then is a compact subset of the locally compact space , contained in the open set , and hence there is a compact neighbourhood of contained in (Chapter I, § 9, no. 7, Proposition 10). The set of all such that is a neighbourhood of , and the set of all such that is a neighbourhood of ; furthermore, the relation implies . Hence the result.
5. Topologies on groups of homeomorphisms
Proposition 10
Let be a uniform space and let be an equicontinuous set of homeomorphisms of onto itself. If and are endowed with the topology of pointwise convergence in , then the mapping of onto is continuous.
It is enough to show that, for each , the mapping of into is continuous at every point . Let be a symmetric entourage of , and let . By hypothesis there is a symmetric entourage of such that the relation implies for all . Take an element which is -close to ; then we have , i.e. . It follows that , i.e. ; this completes the proof.
Corollary
Let be a uniform space and let be an equicontinuous group of homeomorphisms of onto itself. Then the topology of pointwise convergence in is compatible with the group structure of .
This is a consequence of Proposition 10, together with § 2, no. 1, Proposition 1, Corollary 5.
Proposition 11
Let be a compact space and let be the group of all homeomorphisms of onto itself. Then the topology of uniform convergence in is compatible with the group structure of .
We know already (no. 4, Proposition 9) that the mapping of into is continuous with respect to this topology; thus we have to show that is continuous at every point of . Since is uniformly continuous on , given any symmetric entourage of there exists an entourage of such that the relation implies . Hence, if is such that for all , it follows that for all , and therefore (as is bijective) for all . This completes the proof.
Now let be a locally compact space and let be the group of all homeomorphisms of onto itself. The topology of compact convergence in is not necessarily compatible with the group structure of (Exercise 17). Let denote the compact space obtained by adjoining a point at infinity to . Every homeomorphism of onto itself extends uniquely to a homeomorphism of onto itself such that (Chapter I, § 10, no. 3, Corollary to Proposition 7), so that can be identified with the subgroup of the group of all homeomorphisms of onto itself, consisting of all homeomorphisms which leave fixed. The topology induced on by that of is therefore compatible with the group structure of (Proposition 11), and is closed in [with respect to the topology induced by that of ] because it is defined by the equation (§ 1, no. 2, Remark 6). We denote by the group topology thus defined on ; it is finer than the topology of compact convergence and can also (by virtue of § 1, no. 6, Proposition 6) be defined as the topology of uniform convergence on , when is endowed with the uniformity induced by the unique uniformity of .
The topology can be characterized as follows:
Proposition 12
On the group of all homeomorphisms of a locally compact space , the topology is the coarsest for which the mappings and of into are continuous.
Let us denote the latter topology for the moment by . Since is continuous with respect to and since is finer than the topology of compact convergence, it is clear that is finer than . To prove the converse, endow with its unique uniformity; let and let be an entourage of ; then we have to prove that there is a compact subset of and a symmetric entourage of such that the relations
imply
Let be a symmetric open entourage of such that ; then is a compact subset of . Choose a symmetric open entourage of such that and ; this is possible by Proposition 4 of Chapter II, § 4, no. 3. Let , which is a compact subset of . We shall see that and the compact set do what is required. Since , it is enough to show that the relation
implies that
for we shall then also have and thence
for all . Now if we had and
it would follow that , contrary to the choice of ; the proof is therefore complete.
In general the group , endowed with , is not locally compact; but we have the following criterion:
Theorem 4
Let be a subgroup of the group of all homeomorphisms of a locally compact space . Suppose that, in the space , there is a neighbourhood of the identity mapping such that is symmetric in and relatively compact in . Then the closure of in with respect to the topology is a locally compact group with respect to the topology induced by ; this topology induced on is the same as the topology of compact convergence, and the closure of in is a neighbourhood of in with respect to this topology.
Let us show first that is contained in and that the topology induced on by is the same as the topology of compact convergence. Let ; is therefore the limit, in , of an ultrafilter on . Since (the image of under ) is an ultrafilter base on , it converges in the compact subspace of to an element . The mapping converges to with respect to (no. 4, Proposition 9); a fortiori, converges to with respect to , hence since is Hausdorff. Similarly ; hence is a homeomorphism of , i.e., . Thus is contained in . Moreover, this argument shows that and that, for every ultrafilter on which converges to , converges in to ; hence the mapping of into is continuous when carries the topology of compact convergence (Chapter I, § 7, no. 4, Proposition 9, Corollary 1). Proposition 12 then shows that, on , the topology of compact convergence is the same as the topology induced by .
Furthermore, since the topology on is finer than the topology of compact convergence, is also the closure of with respect to . But is a neighbourhood of in with respect to the topology of compact convergence, and a fortiori with respect to the topology induced by ; it follows (Chapter I, § 3, no. 1, Proposition 2) that is a neighbourhood of in with respect to the topology induced by , and hence is locally compact in this topology. If is the interior of with respect to the topology of compact convergence, then is open in , hence is contained in the closure of with respect to (Chapter I, § 1, no. 6, Proposition 5); this shows that is also a neighbourhood of in with respect to the topology of compact convergence. Finally, for each , the bijections and of onto itself are continuous (no. 4, Proposition 9), and hence, if , is a neighbourhood of in with respect to the topology of compact convergence. This completes the proof.
Corollary
Let be a group of homeomorphisms of a locally compact space . If the closure of in is compact, then is a group of homeomorphisms of , and the topology of compact convergence is compatible with the group structure of , which is therefore a compact topological group.
A group of homeomorphisms of a locally compact space which is locally compact but not compact with respect to the topology of compact convergence is locally closed in by virtue of Chapter I, § 9, no. 7, Proposition 12, but is not necessarily closed.
For example, in the ring of endomorphisms of , identified with the ring of square matrices over and endowed with the topology of compact convergence, the group , identified with the group of non-singular matrices, is locally compact but dense (Chapter VI, § 1, no. 6, Proposition 6).
Exercises
See the exercises for § 3.