Definition 1
Tag 0001, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0001].
Algebra, VIII, p. 1, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules
Let A be a ring. We call an A-module M Artinian (resp. Noetherian) if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:
(i) Every nonempty set of submodules of M, ordered by inclusion, has a minimal (resp. maximal) element.
(ii) Every decreasing (resp. increasing) sequence of submodules of M is stationary.
The equivalence of conditions (i) and (ii) follows from Set Theory, III, §6, No. 5, p. 190, Proposition 6.
An A-module M is Artinian (resp. Noetherian) if and only if M, viewed as a module over the ring of homotheties , is Artinian (resp. Noetherian).
Let M be an Artinian (resp. Noetherian) A-module. Every nonempty set of submodules of M, ordered by inclusion, that is left directed (resp. right directed) has a least element (resp. a greatest element) (Set Theory, III, §1, No. 10, p. 145, Proposition 10).
Let M be an Artinian (resp. Noetherian) A-module and a family of submodules of M. The intersections (resp. sums) of finite subfamilies of the family form a nonempty left (resp. right) directed set of submodules of M. Therefore, there exists a finite subset J of I such that (resp. ).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.