Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 0001, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0001].

Algebra, VIII, p. 1, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules

Let A be a ring. We call an A-module M Artinian (resp. Noetherian) if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:

(i) Every nonempty set of submodules of M, ordered by inclusion, has a minimal (resp. maximal) element.

(ii) Every decreasing (resp. increasing) sequence of submodules of M is stationary.

The equivalence of conditions (i) and (ii) follows from Set Theory, III, §6, No. 5, p. 190, Proposition 6.

An A-module M is Artinian (resp. Noetherian) if and only if M, viewed as a module over the ring of homotheties AMA_M, is Artinian (resp. Noetherian).

Let M be an Artinian (resp. Noetherian) A-module. Every nonempty set of submodules of M, ordered by inclusion, that is left directed (resp. right directed) has a least element (resp. a greatest element) (Set Theory, III, §1, No. 10, p. 145, Proposition 10).

Let M be an Artinian (resp. Noetherian) A-module and (Mi)i∈I(M_i)_{i\in I} a family of submodules of M. The intersections (resp. sums) of finite subfamilies of the family (Mi)i∈I(M_i)_{i\in I} form a nonempty left (resp. right) directed set of submodules of M. Therefore, there exists a finite subset J of I such that ⋂i∈IMi=⋂i∈JMi\bigcap_{i\in I}M_i=\bigcap_{i\in J}M_i (resp. ∑i∈IMi=∑i∈JMi\sum_{i\in I}M_i=\sum_{i\in J}M_i).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.