Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 000U, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 000U].

Algebra, VIII, p. 11, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules

Let A be a left Noetherian ring, and let σ\sigma be an automorphism of A and dd an endomorphism of the additive group of A satisfying relation (1). The ring A[X]σ,dA[X]_{\sigma ,d} is left Noetherian.

Set B=A[X]σ,dB = A[X]_{\sigma ,d}. For any integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0, we denote by BnB_n the set of elements of B of the form a0+a1X+⋯+anXna_0+a_1X +\cdots +a_nX^n. It is a left A-submodule of B. The mapping φn:Bn→As\varphi_n: B_n\rightarrow A_s defined by φn(a0+a1X+⋯+anXn)=an\varphi_n(a_0+a_1X +\cdots +a_nX^n) =a_n is A-linear.

Let b\mathfrak{b} be a left ideal of B. For every integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0, the set an=φn(b∩Bn)\mathfrak{a}_n=\varphi_n(\mathfrak{b}\cap B_n) is a left ideal of A. Since we have Xa=σ(a)X+d(a)Xa=\sigma (a)X +d(a) for every a∈Aa\in A, we have

(6) φn+1\varphi_{n+1}(XQ) =σ(φn(Q))=\sigma (\varphi_n(Q))

for every Q∈BnQ\in B_n and therefore σ(an)⊂an+1\sigma (\mathfrak{a}_n)\subset \mathfrak{a}_{n+1}. Consequently, the sequence an′=σ−n(an)\mathfrak{a}'_n=\sigma^{-n}(\mathfrak{a}_n) of ideals of A is increasing. Since the ring A is left Noetherian, there exists an integer m⩾0m\geqslant 0 such that we have an′=an+1′\mathfrak{a}'_n=\mathfrak{a}'_{n+1} for n⩾mn\geqslant m. Since σ\sigma is surjective, we have the relation

σ(an)=an+1(7) \sigma (\mathfrak{a}_n) =\mathfrak{a}_{n+1} \tag{7}

for every integer n⩾mn\geqslant m.

Let c\mathfrak{c} be the left ideal of B generated by b∩Bm\mathfrak{b}\cap B_m. Since the left A-module BmB_m is finitely generated and the ring A is left Noetherian, the left A-module b∩Bm\mathfrak{b}\cap B_m is finitely generated (VIII, p. 7, Proposition 4 a)). The left ideal c\mathfrak{c} is therefore generated by a finite subset of B. It is clear that it is contained in b\mathfrak{b}. Let us prove that it is equal to b\mathfrak{b} by proving by induction that for every integer n⩾0n\geqslant 0, we have

b∩Bn⊂c(8) \mathfrak{b}\cap B_n\subset \mathfrak{c} \tag{8}

Relation (8) is true by construction for n⩽mn\leqslant m. From now on, we assume that nn is an integer ⩾m\geqslant m such that b∩Bn⊂c\mathfrak{b}\cap B_n\subset \mathfrak{c}. Let P be an element of b∩Bn+1\mathfrak{b}\cap B_{n+1}. Then φn+1(P)\varphi_{n+1}(P) belongs to an+1=σ(an)\mathfrak{a}_{n+1}=\sigma (\mathfrak{a}_n), and there consequently exists an element Q of b∩Bn\mathfrak{b}\cap B_n such that φn+1(P)=σ(φn(Q))\varphi_{n+1}(P) =\sigma (\varphi_n(Q)). Set R=P−R = P- XQ. Because of relation (6), we have φn+1(R)=0\varphi_{n+1}(R) = 0, that is, R∈BnR\in B_n. Since P and Q belong to the left ideal b\mathfrak{b} of B, the same is true for R; hence, R and Q belong to b∩Bn\mathfrak{b}\cap B_n, which is contained in the ideal c\mathfrak{c} by the induction hypothesis. Consequently, P belongs to c\mathfrak{c}. This proves that we have b∩Bn+1⊂c\mathfrak{b}\cap B_{n+1}\subset \mathfrak{c}.

It follows that b\mathfrak{b} is equal to c\mathfrak{c}; it is therefore a finitely generated ideal of B. This proves that the ring B is left Noetherian.

If the endomorphism σ\sigma of the ring A is not an automorphism, then the ring A[X]σ,dA[X]_{\sigma ,d} is not necessarily left Noetherian, even when A is a Noetherian commutative ring (VIII, p. 22, Exercise 26).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.