Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 005N, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 005N].

Algebra, VIII, p. 81, § 5. Commutation

Let A be a commutative ring, M a finitely generated A-module, and Ann(M) its annihilator. Let a\mathfrak{a} be an ideal of A. The following properties are equivalent:

(i) aM=M\mathfrak{a}M = M.

(ii) Ann(M) +a=A+\mathfrak{a}= A.

(iii) There exists an element aa of a\mathfrak{a} such that am=mam=m for every m∈Mm\in M.

(i) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii): Let (x1,...,xn)(x_1, . . . , x_n) be a generating family of the A-module M. If aM=M\mathfrak{a}M = M, then each xix_i can be written as ∑j=1ncijxj\sum^n_{j=1}c_{ij}x_j, where the cijc_{ij} belong to a\mathfrak{a}. Denote the matrix (cij)(c_{ij}) by C and the column matrix with entries x1,...,xnx_1, . . . , x_n by X. We have (In−CI_n-C)X = 0. Let dd be the determinant and V the cofactor matrix of the matrix In−CI_n-C. By formula (26) of III, §8, No. 6, p. 532, we have dX=tVdX=^tV(In−CI_n-C)X = 0, so that d∈d\in Ann(M). On the other hand, since the cijc_{ij} belong to a\mathfrak{a}, we have d≡d\equiv 1(mod a\mathfrak{a}) (III, §8, No. 5, p. 529, (18)), and therefore 1∈1\in Ann(M) +a+\mathfrak{a}.

(ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii): Assuming that (ii) holds, there exist a∈aa\in \mathfrak{a} and b∈b\in Ann(M) such that a+b=1a+b= 1. We then have am=mam=m for every m∈Mm\in M.

(iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i): This is clear.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.