Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 006R, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 006R].

Algebra, VIII, p. 97, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras

Suppose that the mappings b↦bPb\mapsto b_P from B to EndA(P)_A(P) and a↦aPa\mapsto a_P from A to EndB(P)_B(P) are bijective. Then σ\sigma and σ~\widetilde{\sigma} are inverse isomorphisms, and we have the relations

Λ=Θ~∘(1P⊗σ)(13) \Lambda =\widetilde{\Theta}\circ (1_P\otimes \sigma ) \tag{13}
Λ~=Θ∘(σ~⊗1P)(14) \widetilde{\Lambda} = \Theta \circ (\widetilde{\sigma}\otimes 1_P) \tag{14}

For x∈P,x∗∈P∗x\in P,x^*\in P^*, and y∈Py\in P, by relations (4), (8), (10), and (11), we have

(15)⟨x,x∗⟩y=xΘ(x∗⊗y)=x⟨σ(x∗),y⟩=Θ~(x⊗σ(x∗))y=⟨x,σ~(σ(x∗))⟩y (15)\langle x, x^*\rangle y=x\Theta (x^*\otimes y) =x\langle \sigma (x^*), y\rangle =\widetilde{\Theta}(x\otimes \sigma (x^*))y=\langle x,\widetilde{\sigma}(\sigma (x^*))\rangle y

Likewise, for x∈P,y~∈P~x\in P,\widetilde{y}\in \widetilde{P}, and y∈Py\in P, we have

x⟨y~,y⟩=Θ~(x⊗y~)y=⟨x,σ~(y~)⟩y=xΘ(σ~(y~)⊗y)=x⟨σ(σ~(y~)),y⟩(16) x\langle \widetilde{y}, y\rangle =\widetilde{\Theta}(x\otimes \widetilde{y})y=\langle x,\widetilde{\sigma}(\widetilde{y})\rangle y=x\Theta (\widetilde{\sigma}(\widetilde{y})\otimes y) =x\langle \sigma (\widetilde{\sigma}(\widetilde{y})), y\rangle \tag{16}

Because of the assumptions, P is faithful as an A-module and as a B-module. From relations (15) and (16), respectively, we deduce σ~∘σ=1P∗\widetilde{\sigma}\circ \sigma = 1_{P^*} and σ∘σ~=\sigma \circ \widetilde{\sigma}= 1P~1_{\widetilde{P}}. Relations (13) and (14) then follow from (12) and (9), respectively.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.