Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 007I, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 007I].

Algebra, VIII, p. 109, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras

Let

(E)V′−→fV−→gV′′ (\mathscr{E})V'-\overset{f}{\rightarrow}V-\overset{g}{\rightarrow}V''

be a diagram of B-modules and B-linear mappings, and let

(P⊗E)P⊗BV′⟶1P⊗fP⊗BV⟶1P⊗gP⊗BV′′ (P\otimes \mathscr{E})P\otimes_BV'\longrightarrow^{1_P\otimes f}P\otimes_BV\longrightarrow^{1_P\otimes g}P\otimes_BV''

be the corresponding diagram of A-modules. Then (E)(\mathscr{E}) is an exact sequence if and only if (P⊗E)(P\otimes \mathscr{E}) is an exact sequence.

Suppose that the sequence (E)(\mathscr{E}) is exact. Since the right B-module P is projective, the sequence (P⊗E)(P\otimes \mathscr{E}) is exact (II, §3, No. 6, p. 251, Proposition 5 and II, §3, No. 7, p. 257, Corollary 6).

Conversely, suppose that the sequence (P⊗E)(P\otimes \mathscr{E}) is exact. Let Q be a (B,A)k(B,A)_k-bimodule, inverse to P, and θ:Q⊗AP→sBd\theta : Q\otimes_AP\rightarrow_sB_d an isomorphism. Consider the commutative diagram

Q⊗AP⊗BV′1Q⊗1P⊗f/Q\otimes_AP\otimes_B{V'}^{1_Q\otimes 1_P\otimes f}// Q⊗AP⊗BV1Q⊗1P⊗g/Q\otimes_AP\otimes_BV^{1_Q\otimes 1_P\otimes g}// Q⊗AP⊗BV′′Q\otimes_AP\otimes_BV''

θ⊗1V′θ⊗1Vθ⊗1V′′\theta \otimes 1_{V'}\theta \otimes 1_V\theta \otimes 1_{V''}

V′fV'f // V gg // V′′V''.

Since Q is a projective A-module and the sequence (P⊗E)(P\otimes \mathscr{E}) is exact, the first line of this diagram is an exact sequence. Since the vertical arrows are isomorphisms, the second line is also exact.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • II, §3, No. 6, p. 251, Proposition 5 not in this corpus
  • II, §3, No. 7, p. 257, Corollary 6 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.