Proposition 12
Tag 007K, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 007K].
Algebra, VIII, p. 110, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras
Let V be a left B-module. The B-module V is projective (resp. generating, faithful, injective, finitely presented ) if and only if the
A-module is.
a) Suppose that V is projective. There exists a set I such that V is isomorphic to a direct factor submodule of . The A-module is then isomorphic to a direct factor submodule of ; since P is a projective A-module, the same holds for .
b) Suppose that the B-module V is generating. Let M be an A-module. There exists a B-module W such that M is isomorphic to . By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 80, there exist a set I and a surjection . By the corollary, the mapping from to is surjective, which gives a surjection . By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 80, is a generating A-module.
c) The B-module V is faithful if and only if its annihilator is reduced to 0. Assertion c) therefore follows from Example 3 of VIII, p. 105.
d) Suppose that V is injective. By the remark of VIII, p. 106, the A-module is isomorphic to Hom, where Q is a -bimodule inverse to A. Since the A-module Q is projective, hence flat (X, §1, n, p. 9, exemple 1), the A-module Hom is injective by X, §1, n, p. 18, proposition 11.
e) Suppose that V admits a finite presentation (X, §1, n, p. 10). By taking the tensor product with P, we deduce an exact sequence of A-modules , where and are projective and finitely generated (Proposition 11 and a)). Let be a finitely generated A-module such that the module is free and finitely generated, and let be the homomorphism ; then can be identified with the cokernel of . Let be a finitely generated free A-module and a surjective homomorphism; the sequence is a finite presentation of the A-module
f) Suppose that the A-module is projective (resp. generating, faithful, injective, finitely presented ). By applying the above (interchanging
the roles of A and B and of P and Q), we see that the B-module also has this property. The same is therefore true for the B-module V, which is isomorphic to it.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
- X, §1, n$^o3$, p. 9 not in this corpus: A X
- X, §1, n$^o4$, p. 10 not in this corpus: A X
- X, §1, n$^o8$, p. 18 not in this corpus: A X
- Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 80
- VIII, p. 106
- Example 3 of VIII, p. 105
- Proposition 11