Bourbaki

Proposition 13

Tag 007M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 007M].

Algebra, VIII, p. 111, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras

a) If two kk-algebras are Morita equivalent, then their centers are isomorphic kk-algebras.

b) Two commutative kk-algebras are Morita equivalent if and only if they are isomorphic.

c) Two kk-algebras that are fields are Morita equivalent if and only if they are isomorphic.

d) For i=1,2i= 1,2, let AiA_i and BiB_i be Morita equivalent kk-algebras and PiP_i an invertible (Ai,Bi)k(A_i,B_i)_k-bimodule. Set A=A1⊗kA2,B=B1⊗kB2A = A_1\otimes_kA_2,B = B_1\otimes_kB_2, and P=P1⊗kP2P = P_1\otimes_kP_2. The kk-algebras A and B are Morita equivalent, and P is an invertible (A,B)k(A,B)_k-bimodule.

e) If A and B are Morita equivalent kk-algebras and k′k' is a commutative kk-algebra, then the k′k'-algebras A(k′)A_{(k')} and B(k′)B_{(k')} are Morita equivalent.

Assertion a) follows from Corollary 1 of VIII, p. 102, and implies b).

Let K and L be kk-algebras that are fields, and let P be an invertible (K,L)k(K,L)_k-bimodule. The right L-vector space P is a simple module (VIII, p. 104), hence of dimension 1, so the kk-algebras EndL(P)_L(P) and L are isomorphic. By VIII, p. 101, Theorem 1, the mapping a↦aPa\mapsto a_P from K to EndL(P)_L(P) is an isomorphism. Therefore, the fields K and L are isomorphic over kk; assertion c) follows.

Under the assumptions of d), let Qi(i=1,2)Q_i(i= 1,2) be a (Bi,Ai)k(B_i,A_i)_k-bimodule inverse to PiP_i. Denote the (B,A)k(B,A)_k-bimodule Q1⊗kQ2Q_1\otimes_kQ_2 by Q. Consider the canonical kk-linear isomorphism (P1⊗kP2)⊗k(Q1⊗kQ2)→(P1⊗kQ1)⊗k(P_1\otimes_kP_2)\otimes_k(Q_1\otimes_kQ_2)\rightarrow (P_1\otimes_kQ_1)\otimes_k (P2⊗kQ2)(P_2\otimes_kQ_2); when passing to the quotient, it defines a morphism

(P1⊗kP2)⊗B(Q1⊗kQ2)→(P1⊗B1Q1)⊗k(P2⊗B2Q2) (P_1\otimes_kP_2)\otimes_B(Q_1\otimes_kQ_2)\rightarrow (P_1\otimes_{B_1}Q_1)\otimes_k(P_2\otimes_{B_2}Q_2)

that is (A(A, A)-linear. Conversely, the inverse isomorphism (P1⊗kQ1)⊗k(P2⊗k(P_1\otimes_kQ_1)\otimes_k(P_2\otimes_k Q2)→(P1⊗kP2)⊗k(Q1⊗kQ2)Q_2)\rightarrow (P_1\otimes_kP_2)\otimes_k(Q_1\otimes_kQ_2) defines an (A(A, A)-linear morphism (P1⊗B1(P_1\otimes_{B_1} Q1)⊗k(P2⊗B2Q2)→(P1⊗kP2)⊗B(Q1⊗kQ2)Q_1)\otimes_k(P_2\otimes_{B_2}Q_2)\rightarrow (P_1\otimes_kP_2)\otimes_B(Q_1\otimes_kQ_2). These two morphisms are each other’s inverses and are thus isomorphisms. Since the (Ai,Ai(A_i,A_i)-bimodule Pi⊗BiQiP_i\otimes_{B_i}Q_i is isomorphic to AiA_i, we obtain an (A(A, A)-linear isomorphism P⊗BP\otimes_B Q→AQ\rightarrow A. We likewise obtain a (B(B, B)-linear isomorphism Q⊗AP→BQ\otimes_AP\rightarrow B, which completes the proof of d).

Under the assumptions of e), let P be an invertible (A,B)k(A,B)_k-bimodule; then P(k′)P_{(k')} is an invertible (A(k′),B(k′))k′(A_{(k')},B_{(k')})_{k'}-bimodule.

Let A be a kk-algebra, and let ee be an idempotent in A. The set eAeeAe, endowed with the addition, multiplication, and action of kk induced by those of A, is a kk-algebra with unit element ee.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • VIII, p. 104
  • Corollary 1 of VIII, p. 102 not in this corpus
Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.