Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 008L, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 008L].

Algebra, VIII, p. 126, § 7. Simple Rings

a) The mapping W↦a(W)W\mapsto \mathfrak{a}(W) is a bijection from the set of linear subspaces of V to the set of left ideals of A.

b) The mapping W↦b(W)W\mapsto \mathfrak{b}(W) is a bijection from the set of linear subspaces of V to the set of right ideals of A.

c) Let W1W_1 and W2W_2 be linear subspaces of V. The relations W1⊂W2W_1\subset W_2, a(W1)⊃a(W2)\mathfrak{a}(W_1)\supset \mathfrak{a}(W_2), and b(W1)⊂b(W2)\mathfrak{b}(W_1)\subset \mathfrak{b}(W_2) are equivalent.

Assertion b) follows from Example 1, b) of VIII, p. 104 applied to the invertible (Do,Ao(D^o,A^o)-bimodule V, as does the equivalence of the relations W1⊂W2W_1\subset W_2 and b(W1)⊂b(W2)\mathfrak{b}(W_1)\subset \mathfrak{b}(W_2).

Let V∗V^* be the dual of V, viewed as a right vector space over the opposite field DoD^o of D. For any subspace W of V, denote the orthogonal of W in V∗V^* by W′W'. The mapping W↦W′W\mapsto W' is a bijection from the set of subspaces of V to the set of subspaces of V∗V^*. If W1W_1 and W2W_2 are two subspaces of V, then the relations W1⊂W2W_1\subset W_2 and W1′⊃W2′W'_1\supset W'_2 are equivalent. Now, the mapping u↦tuu\mapsto^tu is an isomorphism from A to the opposite ring of EndDo(V∗)_{D^o}(V^*); it transforms left ideals of A into right ideals of EndDo(V∗)_{D^o}(V^*) and a(W)\mathfrak{a}(W) into the set b(W′)\mathfrak{b}(W') of endomorphisms hh of V∗V^* such that h(V∗)⊂W′h(V^*)\subset W'. Assertion a), as well as the equivalence of the relations W1⊂W2W_1\subset W_2 and a(W1)⊃a(W2)\mathfrak{a}(W_1)\supset \mathfrak{a}(W_2), then follows from the assertion analogous to b) for the dual V∗V^* of V.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.